A cross-sectional study on the understanding and attitudes toward influenza and influenza vaccines among different occupational groups in China.

IF 4.8 4区 医学
Xinkun Zhao,Xin Hu,Junyi Wang,Mingshuai Shen,Kaifeng Zhou,Xianjie Han,Milton Thomas,Kezhou Wang,Li Wang,Zhao Wang
{"title":"A cross-sectional study on the understanding and attitudes toward influenza and influenza vaccines among different occupational groups in China.","authors":"Xinkun Zhao,Xin Hu,Junyi Wang,Mingshuai Shen,Kaifeng Zhou,Xianjie Han,Milton Thomas,Kezhou Wang,Li Wang,Zhao Wang","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2397214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to assess the level of knowledge regarding influenza viruses and vaccines among different professional groups to investigate the reasons for vaccine hesitancy. We collected 2190 questionnaires regarding influenza vaccines in China in 2022. The respondents were categorized into the general population (GP), foreign affairs workforce population (FAWP), and veterinary workforce population (VWP) according to their job positions. Linear regression was used to assess the association between multiple factors and influenza vaccination rates. The association between work and influenza vaccination rates was also assessed by grouping different workforce populations. The vaccination rate of the GP was higher than that of the VWP (odds ratio: 1.342, 95% confidence interval: 1.025-1.853), surpassing the rates reported in previous studies. This may be attributed to heightened concerns about infectious diseases influenced by the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Despite the VWP's more in-depth knowledge of the VWP on zoonotic diseases and their recognition of their importance, there was no significant difference in influenza knowledge among the three populations. This discrepancy contrasts with the observed differences in vaccination rates. Further investigation revealed that, compared with FAWP, the price of vaccines emerged as a primary influencing factor for vaccination rates (odds ratio:0.398, 95%CI; 0.280-0.564). General concerns regarding the protective effects and side effects of vaccines were also noted.","PeriodicalId":13058,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"198 1","pages":"2397214"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2024.2397214","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the level of knowledge regarding influenza viruses and vaccines among different professional groups to investigate the reasons for vaccine hesitancy. We collected 2190 questionnaires regarding influenza vaccines in China in 2022. The respondents were categorized into the general population (GP), foreign affairs workforce population (FAWP), and veterinary workforce population (VWP) according to their job positions. Linear regression was used to assess the association between multiple factors and influenza vaccination rates. The association between work and influenza vaccination rates was also assessed by grouping different workforce populations. The vaccination rate of the GP was higher than that of the VWP (odds ratio: 1.342, 95% confidence interval: 1.025-1.853), surpassing the rates reported in previous studies. This may be attributed to heightened concerns about infectious diseases influenced by the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Despite the VWP's more in-depth knowledge of the VWP on zoonotic diseases and their recognition of their importance, there was no significant difference in influenza knowledge among the three populations. This discrepancy contrasts with the observed differences in vaccination rates. Further investigation revealed that, compared with FAWP, the price of vaccines emerged as a primary influencing factor for vaccination rates (odds ratio:0.398, 95%CI; 0.280-0.564). General concerns regarding the protective effects and side effects of vaccines were also noted.
关于中国不同职业人群对流感和流感疫苗的理解和态度的横断面研究。
本研究旨在评估不同职业人群对流感病毒和疫苗的认知水平,从而调查疫苗接种犹豫不决的原因。2022 年,我们在中国收集了 2190 份有关流感疫苗的问卷。受访者根据工作岗位被分为普通人群(GP)、外事工作人群(FAWP)和兽医工作人群(VWP)。采用线性回归法评估多种因素与流感疫苗接种率之间的关系。此外,还通过对不同劳动力人群进行分组,评估了工作与流感疫苗接种率之间的关联。全科医生的接种率高于大众医生(几率比:1.342,95% 置信区间:1.025-1.853),超过了以往研究中报告的接种率。这可能是由于受到 2019 年冠状病毒疾病大流行的影响,人们对传染病的担忧加剧。尽管万博滚球电竞对人畜共患疾病有更深入的了解,并认识到其重要性,但三个人群在流感知识方面没有显著差异。这一差异与观察到的疫苗接种率差异形成了鲜明对比。进一步调查显示,与非洲裔妇女和儿童相比,疫苗价格是影响疫苗接种率的主要因素(几率比:0.398,95%CI;0.280-0.564)。此外,人们还普遍关注疫苗的保护作用和副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-IMMUNOLOGY
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: (formerly Human Vaccines; issn 1554-8619) Vaccine research and development is extending its reach beyond the prevention of bacterial or viral diseases. There are experimental vaccines for immunotherapeutic purposes and for applications outside of infectious diseases, in diverse fields such as cancer, autoimmunity, allergy, Alzheimer’s and addiction. Many of these vaccines and immunotherapeutics should become available in the next two decades, with consequent benefit for human health. Continued advancement in this field will benefit from a forum that can (A) help to promote interest by keeping investigators updated, and (B) enable an exchange of ideas regarding the latest progress in the many topics pertaining to vaccines and immunotherapeutics. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics provides such a forum. It is published monthly in a format that is accessible to a wide international audience in the academic, industrial and public sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信