Mindfulness- and Relationship-Based Interventions: Which Break is Better for Improving Classroom Behavior?

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Robin Parks Ennis, Erica Ogle Lee
{"title":"Mindfulness- and Relationship-Based Interventions: Which Break is Better for Improving Classroom Behavior?","authors":"Robin Parks Ennis, Erica Ogle Lee","doi":"10.1007/s43494-024-00128-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Students with emotional and behavioral disorders often need behavioral supports to facilitate their success in the classroom. One commonly used intervention involves taking brief breaks at targeted times during the day to return to the classroom better prepared for participation. However, research is limited on what should happen while a student is on break. Two potential strategies were evaluated using an alternating treatment design with three students at an urban charter school in 1st and 5th grades. Following a baseline phase, breaks alternated between a mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) involving awareness of breath, body, and self and a relationship-based intervention (RBI) involving a “would you rather” get-to-know-you game. Results suggest both interventions improved behavioral outcomes for all participants compared to baseline. For two students, no clear break type had a more profound impact. For one participant, data suggest that MBI was a superior intervention for increasing academic engagement. Both interventions were implemented with acceptable fidelity and social validity. Limitations and future directions are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51493,"journal":{"name":"Education and Treatment of Children","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Treatment of Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-024-00128-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Students with emotional and behavioral disorders often need behavioral supports to facilitate their success in the classroom. One commonly used intervention involves taking brief breaks at targeted times during the day to return to the classroom better prepared for participation. However, research is limited on what should happen while a student is on break. Two potential strategies were evaluated using an alternating treatment design with three students at an urban charter school in 1st and 5th grades. Following a baseline phase, breaks alternated between a mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) involving awareness of breath, body, and self and a relationship-based intervention (RBI) involving a “would you rather” get-to-know-you game. Results suggest both interventions improved behavioral outcomes for all participants compared to baseline. For two students, no clear break type had a more profound impact. For one participant, data suggest that MBI was a superior intervention for increasing academic engagement. Both interventions were implemented with acceptable fidelity and social validity. Limitations and future directions are discussed.

Abstract Image

心灵干预和基于关系的干预:哪种方法更有利于改善课堂行为?
有情绪和行为障碍的学生通常需要行为支持,以帮助他们在课堂上取得成功。其中一种常用的干预措施是在一天中的特定时间进行短暂休息,以便为重返课堂做好更充分的准备。然而,关于学生休息时应该做些什么的研究却很有限。我们采用交替处理设计,对城市特许学校一年级和五年级的三名学生的两种潜在策略进行了评估。在基线阶段之后,休息时间交替进行正念干预(MBI)和关系干预(RBI),前者涉及呼吸、身体和自我意识,后者涉及 "你愿意吗 "的认识你游戏。结果表明,与基线相比,这两种干预都改善了所有参与者的行为结果。对于两名学生来说,没有哪种休息方式能产生更深远的影响。对于一名参与者,数据表明,在提高学习参与度方面,MBI 是一种更好的干预措施。两种干预措施的实施都具有可接受的忠实性和社会有效性。本文讨论了局限性和未来发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Education and Treatment of Children (ETC) is devoted to the dissemination of information concerning the development of services for children and youth who are at risk for or experiencing emotional or behavioral problems. A primary criterion for publication is that the material be of direct value to educators, parents, child care providers, or mental health professionals in improving the effectiveness of their services. Therefore, authors are required to compose their manuscripts in a clear, concise style that will be readily understood by the practitioners who are likely to make use of the information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信