Developing and Validating of the Family Coping Scale for Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Xiong Zhang, Min Zhou, Xiaorong Jin, Yimei Zhang, Wei Wei, Yangjuan Bai, Fang Ma
{"title":"Developing and Validating of the Family Coping Scale for Patients with Chronic Heart Failure","authors":"Xiong Zhang, Min Zhou, Xiaorong Jin, Yimei Zhang, Wei Wei, Yangjuan Bai, Fang Ma","doi":"10.2147/prbm.s479202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background:</strong> : Family coping, as an essential part of family management of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), is an important component of CHF interventions, affecting the health of patients, family members, and the whole family. It is necessary to understand the current situation of family coping in patients with CHF to facilitate the development of family interventions for patients with CHF. This study aims to develop and validate a tool for assessing the family coping scale for patients with CHF.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> The semi-structured interviews, expert consensus meetings, expert consultations, and item analysis were used to develop the initial scale. We employed classical test theory and exploratory factor analysis to scrutinize and refine the items in the scale. To validate the scale, we used confirmatory factor analysis to assess structural validity. We assessed internal consistency, and split-half reliability to ensure the scale’s robustness and accuracy.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> The FCS-CHF consisted of 24 items, including six dimensions: strategies for better management of CHF, psychological coping, substantial support by family members, emergency coping, overall heart failure awareness, and patients’ health behavior. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the scale fitted the data with well construct validity. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis for the overall goodness of fit indices for the fitted model were found to be acceptable for the scale. The scale demonstrates good reliability and validity, meeting the requirements of psychometrics.<br/><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The FCS-CHF developed in this study is considered reliable and valid, which can measure family coping in patients with CHF and provide a basis for developing family coping enhancement strategies.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":20954,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s479202","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: : Family coping, as an essential part of family management of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), is an important component of CHF interventions, affecting the health of patients, family members, and the whole family. It is necessary to understand the current situation of family coping in patients with CHF to facilitate the development of family interventions for patients with CHF. This study aims to develop and validate a tool for assessing the family coping scale for patients with CHF.
Methods: The semi-structured interviews, expert consensus meetings, expert consultations, and item analysis were used to develop the initial scale. We employed classical test theory and exploratory factor analysis to scrutinize and refine the items in the scale. To validate the scale, we used confirmatory factor analysis to assess structural validity. We assessed internal consistency, and split-half reliability to ensure the scale’s robustness and accuracy.
Results: The FCS-CHF consisted of 24 items, including six dimensions: strategies for better management of CHF, psychological coping, substantial support by family members, emergency coping, overall heart failure awareness, and patients’ health behavior. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the scale fitted the data with well construct validity. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis for the overall goodness of fit indices for the fitted model were found to be acceptable for the scale. The scale demonstrates good reliability and validity, meeting the requirements of psychometrics.
Conclusions: The FCS-CHF developed in this study is considered reliable and valid, which can measure family coping in patients with CHF and provide a basis for developing family coping enhancement strategies.

慢性心力衰竭患者家庭应对量表的开发与验证
背景: :家庭应对作为慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者家庭管理的重要组成部分,是 CHF 干预措施的重要组成部分,影响着患者、家庭成员和整个家庭的健康。有必要了解慢性心力衰竭患者家庭应对的现状,以促进慢性心力衰竭患者家庭干预措施的发展。本研究旨在开发并验证一种评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者家庭应对量表的工具:方法:采用半结构式访谈、专家共识会议、专家咨询和项目分析等方法编制初始量表。我们采用经典检验理论和探索性因子分析对量表中的项目进行了仔细研究和完善。为了验证量表的有效性,我们采用了确认性因子分析来评估结构有效性。我们还评估了内部一致性和分半信度,以确保量表的稳健性和准确性:FCS-CHF由24个条目组成,包括六个维度:更好地管理CHF的策略、心理应对、家庭成员的实质性支持、紧急应对、对心衰的整体认识以及患者的健康行为。确认性因子分析结果表明,量表与数据相匹配,具有良好的建构效度。确认性因素分析结果表明,该量表的拟合模型的总体拟合优度指数是可以接受的。该量表具有良好的信度和效度,符合心理测量学的要求:本研究编制的 FCS-CHF 具有可靠性和有效性,可用于测量慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的家庭应对能力,并为制定家庭应对能力增强策略提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
341
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology Research and Behavior Management is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on the science of psychology and its application in behavior management to develop improved outcomes in the clinical, educational, sports and business arenas. Specific topics covered in the journal include: -Neuroscience, memory and decision making -Behavior modification and management -Clinical applications -Business and sports performance management -Social and developmental studies -Animal studies The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical studies, surveys, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信