Is intensive training with a time interval between instruction and planning CT necessary for deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy in breast cancer?

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
M. Sonnhoff, R.-M. Hermann, K. Aust, A.-C. Knöchelmann, M. Nitsche, B. Ernst, H. Christiansen, R.-M. Blach
{"title":"Is intensive training with a time interval between instruction and planning CT necessary for deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy in breast cancer?","authors":"M. Sonnhoff, R.-M. Hermann, K. Aust, A.-C. Knöchelmann, M. Nitsche, B. Ernst, H. Christiansen, R.-M. Blach","doi":"10.1007/s00066-024-02295-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Breathing instruction and exercises and a time gap between training and planning CT scans (pCT) is recommended as part of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) assisted radiotherapy (RT). However, this is associated with additional time expenditure.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Materials and methods</h3><p>In two of the authors’ treatment centers (TC), patient training took place before the planning CT of DIBH-assisted therapy. In TC 1, a further appointment was made with a minimum interval of 2 days to perform the planning CT. At TC 2, the planning CT was performed immediately after the first patient instruction. A retrospective evaluation of the clinical parameters of the therapy was carried out to investigate the relevance of the time gap between DIBH exercises and pCT.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 72 patients were included, 35 of whom were treated in TC 1 and 37 in TC 2. In TC 1, an average interval of ~4 days was observed between patient training and planning CT, while in TC 2, training and CT were performed immediately after each other. No significant differences in radiation dose exposure of the lung on the treated side, the whole lung, or the heart were found between the two centers. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the application of the daily RT fraction. The requirement for daily positioning checks was also the same at both treatment centers.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>This study does not show any advantages for a time gap between instruction/training and pCT. Skipping the time break does not deteriorate any clinically relevant endpoints.</p>","PeriodicalId":21998,"journal":{"name":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-024-02295-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Breathing instruction and exercises and a time gap between training and planning CT scans (pCT) is recommended as part of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) assisted radiotherapy (RT). However, this is associated with additional time expenditure.

Materials and methods

In two of the authors’ treatment centers (TC), patient training took place before the planning CT of DIBH-assisted therapy. In TC 1, a further appointment was made with a minimum interval of 2 days to perform the planning CT. At TC 2, the planning CT was performed immediately after the first patient instruction. A retrospective evaluation of the clinical parameters of the therapy was carried out to investigate the relevance of the time gap between DIBH exercises and pCT.

Results

A total of 72 patients were included, 35 of whom were treated in TC 1 and 37 in TC 2. In TC 1, an average interval of ~4 days was observed between patient training and planning CT, while in TC 2, training and CT were performed immediately after each other. No significant differences in radiation dose exposure of the lung on the treated side, the whole lung, or the heart were found between the two centers. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the application of the daily RT fraction. The requirement for daily positioning checks was also the same at both treatment centers.

Conclusion

This study does not show any advantages for a time gap between instruction/training and pCT. Skipping the time break does not deteriorate any clinically relevant endpoints.

Abstract Image

乳腺癌深吸气憋气放射治疗是否需要在指导和计划 CT 之间间隔一段时间进行强化训练?
背景作为深吸气憋气(DIBH)辅助放射治疗(RT)的一部分,建议进行呼吸指导和练习,并在培训和计划 CT 扫描(pCT)之间留出时间间隔。材料和方法在作者所在的两个治疗中心(TC),患者培训在深吸气辅助治疗的计划 CT 扫描之前进行。在治疗中心 1,至少间隔 2 天再次预约进行计划 CT。在 TC 2,计划 CT 在第一次患者指导后立即进行。对治疗的临床参数进行了回顾性评估,以研究 DIBH 锻炼和 pCT 之间的时间间隔的相关性。两个中心在治疗侧肺、全肺或心脏的辐射剂量暴露方面没有发现明显差异。此外,每日 RT 分量的应用也无明显差异。结论这项研究并未显示指导/培训与 pCT 之间的时间间隔有任何优势。跳过时间间隙不会恶化任何临床相关终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.90%
发文量
141
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, published monthly, is a scientific journal that covers all aspects of oncology with focus on radiooncology, radiation biology and radiation physics. The articles are not only of interest to radiooncologists but to all physicians interested in oncology, to radiation biologists and radiation physicists. The journal publishes original articles, review articles and case studies that are peer-reviewed. It includes scientific short communications as well as a literature review with annotated articles that inform the reader on new developments in the various disciplines concerned and hence allow for a sound overview on the latest results in radiooncology research. Founded in 1912, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie is the oldest oncological journal in the world. Today, contributions are published in English and German. All articles have English summaries and legends. The journal is the official publication of several scientific radiooncological societies and publishes the relevant communications of these societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信