Prognostic impact of lymph node invasion levels in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Junichi Ikeda,Chisato Ohe,Takashi Yoshida,Takahiro Nakamoto,Ryoichi Saito,Koji Tsuta,Hidefumi Kinoshita
{"title":"Prognostic impact of lymph node invasion levels in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.","authors":"Junichi Ikeda,Chisato Ohe,Takashi Yoshida,Takahiro Nakamoto,Ryoichi Saito,Koji Tsuta,Hidefumi Kinoshita","doi":"10.3892/ol.2024.14650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extranodal extension in metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) is a poor prognostic factor in bladder cancer (BC). Furthermore, cancer invasion levels in sentinel LNs are associated with prognosis in melanoma. The present study aimed to evaluate the LN invasion level, defined as the extent of cancer invasion in anatomical and immunological LN substructures, and compare it with the pathological node (pN) stage of the tumor-node-metastasis staging system in BC. A total of 98 patients with BC who underwent radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy were retrospectively assessed. The LN invasion level was classified as follows: Level 0, no cancer cell within the resected LNs; Level 1, cancer cells confined to intracapsular lymph vessels and subcapsular or transverse sinuses; Level 2, cancer cells infiltrating the cortex, paracortex or medulla; and Level 3, cancer cells infiltrating or beyond the LN capsule. The proportion of patients with Levels 0, 1, 2 and 3 was 70.4% (69/98), 8.2% (8/98), 14.3% (14/98) and 7.1% (7/98), respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) with LN invasion levels better stratified outcome patient when using Levels 1-3 compared with pN1-3. In addition, LN invasion levels better predicted RFS, CSS and OS, in comparison with the pN stage (c-index of 0.672 vs. 0.646, 0.688 vs. 0.665, and 0.702 vs. 0.661, respectively). Finally, multivariate analysis revealed that the predictive accuracy of the model integrating pathological tumor (pT) stage and LN invasion levels in RFS, CSS and OS was greater than that of the conventional model that included pT and pN stage (c-index of 0.723 vs. 0.703, 0.710 vs. 0.694, and 0.725 vs. 0.692, respectively). In conclusion, the model with LN invasion levels accurately predicted the prognosis of patients with BC after radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.","PeriodicalId":19503,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2024.14650","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extranodal extension in metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) is a poor prognostic factor in bladder cancer (BC). Furthermore, cancer invasion levels in sentinel LNs are associated with prognosis in melanoma. The present study aimed to evaluate the LN invasion level, defined as the extent of cancer invasion in anatomical and immunological LN substructures, and compare it with the pathological node (pN) stage of the tumor-node-metastasis staging system in BC. A total of 98 patients with BC who underwent radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy were retrospectively assessed. The LN invasion level was classified as follows: Level 0, no cancer cell within the resected LNs; Level 1, cancer cells confined to intracapsular lymph vessels and subcapsular or transverse sinuses; Level 2, cancer cells infiltrating the cortex, paracortex or medulla; and Level 3, cancer cells infiltrating or beyond the LN capsule. The proportion of patients with Levels 0, 1, 2 and 3 was 70.4% (69/98), 8.2% (8/98), 14.3% (14/98) and 7.1% (7/98), respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) with LN invasion levels better stratified outcome patient when using Levels 1-3 compared with pN1-3. In addition, LN invasion levels better predicted RFS, CSS and OS, in comparison with the pN stage (c-index of 0.672 vs. 0.646, 0.688 vs. 0.665, and 0.702 vs. 0.661, respectively). Finally, multivariate analysis revealed that the predictive accuracy of the model integrating pathological tumor (pT) stage and LN invasion levels in RFS, CSS and OS was greater than that of the conventional model that included pT and pN stage (c-index of 0.723 vs. 0.703, 0.710 vs. 0.694, and 0.725 vs. 0.692, respectively). In conclusion, the model with LN invasion levels accurately predicted the prognosis of patients with BC after radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncology Letters
Oncology Letters ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
412
审稿时长
2.0 months
期刊介绍: Oncology Letters is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal, available in print and online, that focuses on all aspects of clinical oncology, as well as in vitro and in vivo experimental model systems relevant to the mechanisms of disease. The principal aim of Oncology Letters is to provide the prompt publication of original studies of high quality that pertain to clinical oncology, chemotherapy, oncogenes, carcinogenesis, metastasis, epidemiology and viral oncology in the form of original research, reviews and case reports.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信