Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: impact of long-standing disease on surgical outcomes

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Gian Marco Pace, Francesco Giombi, Francesca Pirola, Elena Russo, Michele Cerasuolo, Jessica Zuppardo, Giovanna Muci, Gianmarco Giunta, Alessandra Di Maria, Mario R. Romano, Giuseppe Mercante, Giuseppe Spriano, Luca Malvezzi
{"title":"Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: impact of long-standing disease on surgical outcomes","authors":"Gian Marco Pace, Francesco Giombi, Francesca Pirola, Elena Russo, Michele Cerasuolo, Jessica Zuppardo, Giovanna Muci, Gianmarco Giunta, Alessandra Di Maria, Mario R. Romano, Giuseppe Mercante, Giuseppe Spriano, Luca Malvezzi","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-08956-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To assess whether the duration of disease may influence the surgical success of Endonasal Endoscopic DCR (EE-DCR) in patients affected by nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Single-center observational retrospective analysis on EE-DCR via posterior trans-ethmoidal approach. Consecutive patients were enrolled in 2021–2024 and evaluated with proper questionnaires; resolution of epiphora and dacryocystitis were analyzed after 1 (T1) and 6-months (T2) from surgery. Surgical success was defined as anatomical (patency at irrigation, no recurring dacryocystitis) or complete (zeroing of Munk score). Also, patients were asked to complete the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at each timepoint. The sample was divided based on the duration of disease (group A: ≤ 24 months, group B: &gt; 24 months).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Ninety-one patients were included. At baseline no differences were observed between the two groups. At both timepoints, Munk score was significantly lower in Group A compared to Group B, while a difference in dacryocystitis rate was observed only at T2. Anxiety scores differed significantly at T2, although no differences were observed for depression. At paired analysis, all groups improved significantly at T1 compared to baseline, whereas no further improvement was observed between T2 and T1. A significantly higher improvement was observed in group A for the Munk and HADS-A scores over timepoints, whereas there was no significance for dacryocystitis rate and HADS-D. Also, group A showed a higher complete success rate compared to group B (<i>p</i> = 0.041). Finally, linear regression confirmed a positive relationship between Munk and anxiety scores and the duration of disease at T2.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings showed that long-lasting NLDO symptoms may be associated with worse EE-DCR surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08956-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To assess whether the duration of disease may influence the surgical success of Endonasal Endoscopic DCR (EE-DCR) in patients affected by nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO).

Methods

Single-center observational retrospective analysis on EE-DCR via posterior trans-ethmoidal approach. Consecutive patients were enrolled in 2021–2024 and evaluated with proper questionnaires; resolution of epiphora and dacryocystitis were analyzed after 1 (T1) and 6-months (T2) from surgery. Surgical success was defined as anatomical (patency at irrigation, no recurring dacryocystitis) or complete (zeroing of Munk score). Also, patients were asked to complete the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at each timepoint. The sample was divided based on the duration of disease (group A: ≤ 24 months, group B: > 24 months).

Results

Ninety-one patients were included. At baseline no differences were observed between the two groups. At both timepoints, Munk score was significantly lower in Group A compared to Group B, while a difference in dacryocystitis rate was observed only at T2. Anxiety scores differed significantly at T2, although no differences were observed for depression. At paired analysis, all groups improved significantly at T1 compared to baseline, whereas no further improvement was observed between T2 and T1. A significantly higher improvement was observed in group A for the Munk and HADS-A scores over timepoints, whereas there was no significance for dacryocystitis rate and HADS-D. Also, group A showed a higher complete success rate compared to group B (p = 0.041). Finally, linear regression confirmed a positive relationship between Munk and anxiety scores and the duration of disease at T2.

Conclusions

Our findings showed that long-lasting NLDO symptoms may be associated with worse EE-DCR surgical outcomes.

Abstract Image

内窥镜鼻腔内泪囊鼻腔造口术:久治不愈的疾病对手术效果的影响
目的评估鼻泪管阻塞(NLDO)患者的病程是否会影响鼻内镜下鼻泪管阻塞(EE-DCR)手术的成功率。方法对经鼻后孔入路的鼻内镜下鼻泪管阻塞(EE-DCR)进行单中心观察性回顾分析。2021-2024年连续入组患者,并通过适当的问卷调查进行评估;分析了手术后1个月(T1)和6个月(T2)的外窥和泪囊炎缓解情况。手术成功的定义是解剖上的成功(冲洗时通畅,泪囊炎不再复发)或完全成功(Munk 评分为零)。此外,患者还需在每个时间点填写医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)。样本根据病程划分(A 组:≤ 24 个月,B 组:24 个月)。两组患者在基线上无差异。在两个时间点上,A 组的蒙克评分均明显低于 B 组,而泪囊炎发病率仅在第二阶段出现差异。焦虑评分在第二阶段有明显差异,但抑郁评分没有差异。在配对分析中,与基线相比,所有组别在 T1 都有明显改善,但在 T2 和 T1 之间没有进一步改善。A 组的 Munk 和 HADS-A 评分在各时间点的改善幅度明显更大,而泪囊炎发生率和 HADS-D 的改善幅度则不明显。此外,与 B 组相比,A 组的完全成功率更高(p = 0.041)。最后,线性回归证实了 Munk 和焦虑评分与 T2 病程之间的正相关关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信