Severe adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes according to the planned birth setting being midwife-led birth centers or obstetric-led units

IF 3.5 2区医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-09-15 DOI:10.1111/aogs.14971

Clara Rollet, Camille Le Ray, Françoise Vendittelli, Béatrice Blondel, Anne Alice Chantry

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The establishment of midwife-led birth centers (MLBCs) is still being debated. The study aimed to compare severe adverse outcomes and mode of birth in low-risk women according to their birth planned in MLBCs or in obstetric-led units (OUs) in France.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

根据助产士主导的分娩中心或产科主导的分娩单位的计划分娩环境，孕产妇和新生儿的严重不良后果

助产士主导的分娩中心（MLBCs）的建立仍存在争议。这项研究旨在比较法国低风险产妇在助产士主导型分娩中心（MLBC）或产科主导型分娩中心（OU）分娩时的严重不良后果和分娩方式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 医学-妇产科学

CiteScore

8.00

自引率

4.70%

发文量

180

审稿时长

3-6 weeks

期刊介绍： Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.