The uptake and utility of a reflective practice group for psychiatry registrars in a state-wide forensic service

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Graham Walker, Jaydip Sarkar, Ruchi Bhalla
{"title":"The uptake and utility of a reflective practice group for psychiatry registrars in a state-wide forensic service","authors":"Graham Walker, Jaydip Sarkar, Ruchi Bhalla","doi":"10.1177/10398562241277457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesIt is essential that mental health clinicians have access to reflective processes where they may understand and make sense of emotional responses to patients, teams, and organisations. The authors share their experience of initiating and successfully running a reflective practice group, framed with Balint principles, for psychiatry registrars working in forensic settings across Victoria.MethodWe describe the process of setting up a Balint group for this professional population. Qualitative feedback was obtained from group members. The data was analysed thematically, regarding motivating factors for group attendance and feedback post pilot group.ResultsOverall, feedback on the pilot Balint group was positive, which led to the group being extended for recurring 6-month periods. We share an illustrative example of a complex case which could be formulated in a forensic psychiatry Balint group setting, alongside reflections of the facilitators of the group.ConclusionsReflection is paramount for safe, effective mental health treatment, particularly in the context of forensic psychiatry. Our pilot results highlight areas where the approach of setting up a fledgling Balint group has been successful. We hope to inspire others to engage and participate in routine reflective practice.","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562241277457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesIt is essential that mental health clinicians have access to reflective processes where they may understand and make sense of emotional responses to patients, teams, and organisations. The authors share their experience of initiating and successfully running a reflective practice group, framed with Balint principles, for psychiatry registrars working in forensic settings across Victoria.MethodWe describe the process of setting up a Balint group for this professional population. Qualitative feedback was obtained from group members. The data was analysed thematically, regarding motivating factors for group attendance and feedback post pilot group.ResultsOverall, feedback on the pilot Balint group was positive, which led to the group being extended for recurring 6-month periods. We share an illustrative example of a complex case which could be formulated in a forensic psychiatry Balint group setting, alongside reflections of the facilitators of the group.ConclusionsReflection is paramount for safe, effective mental health treatment, particularly in the context of forensic psychiatry. Our pilot results highlight areas where the approach of setting up a fledgling Balint group has been successful. We hope to inspire others to engage and participate in routine reflective practice.
全州法医服务机构精神病学注册医师反思性实践小组的采用情况和效用
目标心理健康临床医生必须有机会参与反思过程,在此过程中他们可以了解并理解对患者、团队和组织的情绪反应。作者分享了他们为在维多利亚州法医机构工作的精神病学注册医师发起并成功运行一个反思性实践小组的经验,该小组以巴林特原则为框架。我们从小组成员那里获得了定性反馈。我们对数据进行了专题分析,分析了参加小组活动的动机因素和试点小组活动后的反馈意见。结果总体而言,对试点巴林特小组的反馈意见是积极的,因此该小组的活动时间延长了 6 个月。我们分享了一个可以在法医精神病学巴林特小组环境中制定的复杂病例的示例,以及小组主持人的反思。结论反思对于安全、有效的心理健康治疗至关重要,尤其是在法医精神病学的背景下。我们的试点结果凸显了建立新的巴林特小组的方法在哪些方面取得了成功。我们希望能激励其他人参与到常规反思实践中来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Psychiatry
Australasian Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
159
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信