Investigating the Effects of Practice Time on Student Achievement Considering Variations in Demographics across Various Chemistry Topics

IF 2.5 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sloka Suresh, Stephanie Toy, Neha Gondra, Auddy Guerrero Anilao, Brandon Vernoy, Ingo Eilks, Ozcan Gulacar
{"title":"Investigating the Effects of Practice Time on Student Achievement Considering Variations in Demographics across Various Chemistry Topics","authors":"Sloka Suresh, Stephanie Toy, Neha Gondra, Auddy Guerrero Anilao, Brandon Vernoy, Ingo Eilks, Ozcan Gulacar","doi":"10.3390/educsci14091016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the relationship between the time students spend on practice problems and their performance on exams in various chemistry topics, considering their demographics. The researchers divided 91 general chemistry students into three groups based on the time allotted for solving intervention questions: Minimum, Average, and Maximum. The results showed that the Minimum and Average time groups benefited almost equally, but the performance of the Maximum time group declined. This suggests that, while additional practice is beneficial, there could be an optimal amount of time that students should spend on each question. Spending too much time on a single question can lead to mental and emotional fatigue, resulting in a decline in performance. Additionally, the researchers noted variations in performance across different chemistry topics and student groups, and they examined the relationship between student demographics and their problem-solving performances. The study provides recommendations for educators, testing services, and online homework systems to improve the effectiveness of chemistry instruction, highlighting the importance of finding the right balance between practice time and student engagement, and suggesting that a uniform approach to practice problems may not be ideal for every student.","PeriodicalId":11472,"journal":{"name":"Education Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14091016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between the time students spend on practice problems and their performance on exams in various chemistry topics, considering their demographics. The researchers divided 91 general chemistry students into three groups based on the time allotted for solving intervention questions: Minimum, Average, and Maximum. The results showed that the Minimum and Average time groups benefited almost equally, but the performance of the Maximum time group declined. This suggests that, while additional practice is beneficial, there could be an optimal amount of time that students should spend on each question. Spending too much time on a single question can lead to mental and emotional fatigue, resulting in a decline in performance. Additionally, the researchers noted variations in performance across different chemistry topics and student groups, and they examined the relationship between student demographics and their problem-solving performances. The study provides recommendations for educators, testing services, and online homework systems to improve the effectiveness of chemistry instruction, highlighting the importance of finding the right balance between practice time and student engagement, and suggesting that a uniform approach to practice problems may not be ideal for every student.
调查练习时间对学生成绩的影响,同时考虑不同化学课题的人口统计学差异
本研究考察了学生在练习题上花费的时间与他们在各种化学题目考试中的成绩之间的关系,同时考虑到了他们的人口统计学特征。研究人员根据学生解决干预问题的时间,将 91 名普通化学学生分为三组:最低组、平均组和最高组。结果显示,最少时间组和平均时间组受益几乎相同,但最多时间组的成绩有所下降。这表明,虽然额外的练习是有益的,但学生在每道题上花费的时间可能是最合适的。在一个问题上花费过多时间会导致心理和情绪疲劳,从而导致成绩下降。此外,研究人员还注意到不同化学题目和学生群体之间的成绩差异,并研究了学生的人口统计学特征与他们的解题成绩之间的关系。该研究为教育工作者、考试服务机构和在线作业系统提供了提高化学教学效果的建议,强调了在练习时间和学生参与之间找到适当平衡的重要性,并指出统一的练习题方法可能并不适合每个学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education Sciences
Education Sciences Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
770
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信