Self‐Reported Perceptions of Patients and Staff on Participation and Verbal and Social Interactions in High‐Security Forensic Psychiatric Care in Sweden

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Andreas Söderberg, Märta Wallinius, Christian Munthe, Ulrica Hörberg, Mikael Rask
{"title":"Self‐Reported Perceptions of Patients and Staff on Participation and Verbal and Social Interactions in High‐Security Forensic Psychiatric Care in Sweden","authors":"Andreas Söderberg, Märta Wallinius, Christian Munthe, Ulrica Hörberg, Mikael Rask","doi":"10.1111/jpm.13105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionStudies suggest that experiences of patient participation, as described by both patients and staff, are associated with a significant caring relationship of high quality.AimThis study aimed to investigate staffs' and patients' self‐reported perceptions on participation and the frequency and importance of verbal and social interactions in high‐security forensic psychiatry.MethodThe questionnaire Verbal and Social Interactions (VSI) was used together with the subscale <jats:italic>Participation</jats:italic> from Quality in Psychiatric Care (QPC). The study was conducted at a large forensic psychiatric clinic in Sweden.ResultsStaff and patients rated the frequency of VSI differently while reporting the same perceived degree of patient participation. All categories of VSI were significantly correlated with perceived level of participation with medium or small effect size for the patients.DiscussionPatients' perceived participation seems to depend on verbal and social interaction within the specific categories ‘<jats:italic>Showing interest in the patients’ feelings</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>experiences</jats:italic>, <jats:italic>and behavior’</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>‘Helping the patients establish structure and routines in their everyday life’</jats:italic>. There was, however, a <jats:italic>negative</jats:italic> association for the latter.Implications for PracticeThe results give a better understanding of what kind of interactions that affect patients' perceived level of participation.Relevance StatementPatient participant is a prioritised area for development in forensic psychiatry. The study contributes to a better understanding of what types of interactions that affect the perceived level of participation, while at the same time, it shows important similarities and differences between patient and staff perspectives.","PeriodicalId":50076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.13105","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionStudies suggest that experiences of patient participation, as described by both patients and staff, are associated with a significant caring relationship of high quality.AimThis study aimed to investigate staffs' and patients' self‐reported perceptions on participation and the frequency and importance of verbal and social interactions in high‐security forensic psychiatry.MethodThe questionnaire Verbal and Social Interactions (VSI) was used together with the subscale Participation from Quality in Psychiatric Care (QPC). The study was conducted at a large forensic psychiatric clinic in Sweden.ResultsStaff and patients rated the frequency of VSI differently while reporting the same perceived degree of patient participation. All categories of VSI were significantly correlated with perceived level of participation with medium or small effect size for the patients.DiscussionPatients' perceived participation seems to depend on verbal and social interaction within the specific categories ‘Showing interest in the patients’ feelings, experiences, and behavior’ and ‘Helping the patients establish structure and routines in their everyday life’. There was, however, a negative association for the latter.Implications for PracticeThe results give a better understanding of what kind of interactions that affect patients' perceived level of participation.Relevance StatementPatient participant is a prioritised area for development in forensic psychiatry. The study contributes to a better understanding of what types of interactions that affect the perceived level of participation, while at the same time, it shows important similarities and differences between patient and staff perspectives.
瑞典高度戒备法医精神病护理中患者和工作人员对参与、语言和社交互动的自述看法
导言研究表明,患者和医护人员所描述的患者参与体验与高质量的护理关系密切相关。本研究旨在调查医护人员和患者自我报告的对参与的看法,以及在高度戒备的法医精神病学中语言和社交互动的频率和重要性。方法使用了语言和社交互动(VSI)问卷以及精神病学护理质量(QPC)中的参与子量表。研究在瑞典一家大型法医精神病诊所进行。结果工作人员和患者对 VSI 频率的评价不同,但对患者参与程度的感知相同。讨论患者的感知参与度似乎取决于 "对患者的感受、经历和行为表现出兴趣 "和 "帮助患者建立日常生活的结构和常规 "这两个特定类别中的语言和社交互动。对实践的启示研究结果让我们更好地了解了什么样的互动会影响患者的参与程度。相关声明患者参与是法医精神病学优先发展的领域。本研究有助于更好地理解哪些类型的互动会影响患者的参与程度,同时也显示了患者和工作人员观点之间的重要异同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing is an international journal which publishes research and scholarly papers that advance the development of policy, practice, research and education in all aspects of mental health nursing. We publish rigorously conducted research, literature reviews, essays and debates, and consumer practitioner narratives; all of which add new knowledge and advance practice globally. All papers must have clear implications for mental health nursing either solely or part of multidisciplinary practice. Papers are welcomed which draw on single or multiple research and academic disciplines. We give space to practitioner and consumer perspectives and ensure research published in the journal can be understood by a wide audience. We encourage critical debate and exchange of ideas and therefore welcome letters to the editor and essays and debates in mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信