The role of intra-vascular imaging in patients undergoing intravascular lithotripsy: Insights from the COIL registry

Abstract

Background

The role of intra-coronary imaging in patients with stent failure undergoing intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is unclear. We aimed to assess clinical outcomes in patients undergoing IVL treatment for stent failure stratified according to the use of intra-coronary imaging and lesion complexity.

Methods

This is a pre-specified subgroup analysis of patients who were included in the coronary intravascular lithotripsy in patients with stent failure (COIL) registry (international multi-centre study assessing IVL treatment for stent failure in 6 European centres). A complex lesion was defined if IVL treatment was used in the left main, true bifurcation, long lesion, or coupled with athero-ablative therapy. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 12 months.

Results

There were 102 patients analyzed, of whom 27 (26%) patients had complex anatomy. The use of intra-coronary imaging following IVL in stent failure was more frequent in patients with complex versus Noncomplex anatomy (56% vs. 31%, p = 0.022). IVL treatment was effective in both groups, however, patients with complex anatomy had worse clinical outcomes (30% vs. 11%, p = 0.02), driven by a higher rate of TVR (26% vs. 8%, p = 0.017). In the complex group, patients who underwent intracoronary imaging post intervention had lower event rate compared to those without imaging (13% vs. 50%, p = 0.038).

Conclusions

In patients undergoing IVL treatment for stent failure with complex coronary anatomy, the use of intra-coronary imaging was associated with fewer adverse events compared to angiography guided intervention.