Contention and concessions: Exploring the responsiveness of Chinese mining companies in Africa

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Jan Sändig , Jana Hönke , Claude Kabemba
{"title":"Contention and concessions: Exploring the responsiveness of Chinese mining companies in Africa","authors":"Jan Sändig ,&nbsp;Jana Hönke ,&nbsp;Claude Kabemba","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2024.101535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As China's investments are rising fast across the globe, we examine the circumstances under which Chinese mining companies concede to protest. While scholars have already identified success conditions of such struggles, it is unclear if these conditions apply to Chinese cases as well. More so, some research suggests that Chinese business practices fundamentally differ from others. Therefore, we seek to better understand Chinese corporate responsiveness by examining major mining projects from Guinea and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Our analysis draws on protest event data (collected from news and social media), interviews, and further sources to trace protests and company responses. We find that Chinese mining companies indeed concede under similar conditions as Western and other companies: recurrent disruptive actions, pressure from state actors and NGOs, and reputational concerns are key factors for their responsiveness. As we discuss, however, reputational vulnerabilities, which result from global supply chains and transnational activism, are differently distributed in the Chinese case, which undercuts the responsiveness of some major Chinese miners.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 101535"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X2400131X/pdfft?md5=727ebb0d1126757054057c5c9aa2d2ce&pid=1-s2.0-S2214790X2400131X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X2400131X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As China's investments are rising fast across the globe, we examine the circumstances under which Chinese mining companies concede to protest. While scholars have already identified success conditions of such struggles, it is unclear if these conditions apply to Chinese cases as well. More so, some research suggests that Chinese business practices fundamentally differ from others. Therefore, we seek to better understand Chinese corporate responsiveness by examining major mining projects from Guinea and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Our analysis draws on protest event data (collected from news and social media), interviews, and further sources to trace protests and company responses. We find that Chinese mining companies indeed concede under similar conditions as Western and other companies: recurrent disruptive actions, pressure from state actors and NGOs, and reputational concerns are key factors for their responsiveness. As we discuss, however, reputational vulnerabilities, which result from global supply chains and transnational activism, are differently distributed in the Chinese case, which undercuts the responsiveness of some major Chinese miners.

争议与特许权:探索中国矿业公司在非洲的反应能力
随着中国在全球的投资迅速增加,我们研究了中国矿业公司在何种情况下屈服于抗议。尽管学者们已经指出了此类抗争的成功条件,但尚不清楚这些条件是否也适用于中国案例。更有甚者,一些研究表明,中国的商业实践与其他国家存在本质区别。因此,我们试图通过研究几内亚和刚果民主共和国(DRC)的大型采矿项目,更好地了解中国企业的回应能力。我们的分析借鉴了抗议事件数据(从新闻和社交媒体中收集)、访谈以及其他资料来源,以追踪抗议活动和企业回应。我们发现,中国矿业公司确实在与西方公司和其他公司类似的条件下做出了让步:经常性的破坏行动、来自国家行为者和非政府组织的压力以及对声誉的担忧,都是他们做出回应的关键因素。然而,正如我们所讨论的,全球供应链和跨国行动主义导致的声誉脆弱性在中国案例中的分布有所不同,这削弱了一些中国大型矿业公司的反应能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信