Exploring the Optimized Leaf Area Index Retrieval Strategy Based on the Look-up Table Approach for Decametric-Resolution Images

IF 7.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Qi Wang;Zhewei Zhang;Tongzhou Wu;Wenjie Jin;Ke Meng;Qian Song;Cong Wang;Gaofei Yin;Baodong Xu
{"title":"Exploring the Optimized Leaf Area Index Retrieval Strategy Based on the Look-up Table Approach for Decametric-Resolution Images","authors":"Qi Wang;Zhewei Zhang;Tongzhou Wu;Wenjie Jin;Ke Meng;Qian Song;Cong Wang;Gaofei Yin;Baodong Xu","doi":"10.1109/TGRS.2024.3462099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Leaf area index (LAI) is a pivotal biophysical parameter for characterizing canopy structure and monitoring vegetation growth. Although the look-up table (LUT) method has been widely employed for LAI retrieval, the optimization of key retrieval processes remains to be explored. Here, we proposed a generic optimization strategy for LUT-based inversion based on Landsat -8 imagery and global ground LAI measurements. Specifically, based on the LUT generated by the PROSAIL model, LAI inversion was optimized by introducing several functions, including band selection, artificial noise addition, cost function (CF) substitution, and multiple solutions. Furthermore, the optimized LUT-based inversion method was compared to the Simplified Level 2 Product Prototype Processor (SL2P) method and the ground-measurement-derived (GMD) regression method to comprehensively evaluate its performance over various vegetation types. Results showed that the combination of Red, near-infrared (NIR), and shortwave infrared-1 (SWIR1) bands was well suited to capture LAI dynamics. In terms of accuracy and efficiency, the best performance was achieved by the optimal band combination and retrieval parameter settings (i.e., root-mean-square error (RMSE) as CF, noise level of 20%, and multiple solutions of 5%), with the RMSE and \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${R} ^{2}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n of 0.817 and 0.740, respectively. In addition, the optimized LUT-based inversion was superior to SL2P method in accuracy and to GMD regression method in efficiency. Overall, the optimized LUT-based inversion strategy can be applied for estimating decametric-resolution LAI with high accuracy over different regions and observation dates at a global scale, exhibiting high adaptability and generalization capability, especially for crops, and requiring no ground LAI measurements.","PeriodicalId":13213,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10681130/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leaf area index (LAI) is a pivotal biophysical parameter for characterizing canopy structure and monitoring vegetation growth. Although the look-up table (LUT) method has been widely employed for LAI retrieval, the optimization of key retrieval processes remains to be explored. Here, we proposed a generic optimization strategy for LUT-based inversion based on Landsat -8 imagery and global ground LAI measurements. Specifically, based on the LUT generated by the PROSAIL model, LAI inversion was optimized by introducing several functions, including band selection, artificial noise addition, cost function (CF) substitution, and multiple solutions. Furthermore, the optimized LUT-based inversion method was compared to the Simplified Level 2 Product Prototype Processor (SL2P) method and the ground-measurement-derived (GMD) regression method to comprehensively evaluate its performance over various vegetation types. Results showed that the combination of Red, near-infrared (NIR), and shortwave infrared-1 (SWIR1) bands was well suited to capture LAI dynamics. In terms of accuracy and efficiency, the best performance was achieved by the optimal band combination and retrieval parameter settings (i.e., root-mean-square error (RMSE) as CF, noise level of 20%, and multiple solutions of 5%), with the RMSE and ${R} ^{2}$ of 0.817 and 0.740, respectively. In addition, the optimized LUT-based inversion was superior to SL2P method in accuracy and to GMD regression method in efficiency. Overall, the optimized LUT-based inversion strategy can be applied for estimating decametric-resolution LAI with high accuracy over different regions and observation dates at a global scale, exhibiting high adaptability and generalization capability, especially for crops, and requiring no ground LAI measurements.
探索基于查找表法的优化叶面积指数检索策略,适用于解像度分辨率图像
叶面积指数(LAI)是表征冠层结构和监测植被生长的关键生物物理参数。虽然查找表(LUT)方法已被广泛用于叶面积指数检索,但关键检索过程的优化仍有待探索。在此,我们基于 Landsat -8 影像和全球地面 LAI 测量结果,提出了基于 LUT 反演的通用优化策略。具体来说,基于 PROSAIL 模型生成的 LUT,通过引入多个函数(包括波段选择、人工噪声添加、成本函数(CF)替代和多方案)对 LAI 反演进行了优化。此外,还将优化后的基于 LUT 的反演方法与简化 2 级产品原型处理器 (SL2P) 方法和地面测量衍生 (GMD) 回归方法进行了比较,以全面评估其在各种植被类型中的性能。结果表明,红外、近红外和短波红外-1 波段的组合非常适合捕捉 LAI 的动态变化。在精度和效率方面,最佳波段组合和检索参数设置(即均方根误差(RMSE)为 CF、噪声水平为 20%、多解率为 5%)实现了最佳性能,RMSE 和 ${R} ^{2}$ 分别为 0.817 和 0.740。此外,基于 LUT 的优化反演在精度上优于 SL2P 方法,在效率上优于 GMD 回归方法。总之,基于 LUT 的优化反演策略可用于在全球范围内不同区域和不同观测日期高精度估算非计量分辨率的 LAI,具有很强的适应性和普适性,特别是对作物而言,且无需地面 LAI 测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 工程技术-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
28.00%
发文量
1912
审稿时长
4.0 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (TGRS) is a monthly publication that focuses on the theory, concepts, and techniques of science and engineering as applied to sensing the land, oceans, atmosphere, and space; and the processing, interpretation, and dissemination of this information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信