Longitudinal assessment of knee joint proprioception using weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing tests throughout rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Adam Grinberg, Andrew Strong, Charlotte K. Häger
{"title":"Longitudinal assessment of knee joint proprioception using weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing tests throughout rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction","authors":"Adam Grinberg,&nbsp;Andrew Strong,&nbsp;Charlotte K. Häger","doi":"10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Evaluate active knee joint position sense (JPS) throughout rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Longitudinal.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Motion laboratory.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Twenty-two individuals post-ACLR and 22 activity-matched non-injured controls performed weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing knee JPS tests. The ACLR participants performed at three functional timepoints: T1, able to perform single-leg sit-to-stand; T2, able to hop maximally; T3, cleared for return to sports. Controls performed on one occasion.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Constant, absolute, variable errors (CE, AE, VE) and interlimb symmetry estimates (100% signifying perfect symmetry), for 40° and 65° knee flexion target angles.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For the weight-bearing 40° condition, CE and AE of the ACLR knee significantly increased from T1 to T2 (P = 0.010) and T1 to T3 (P = 0.002). Consequently, interlimb asymmetry for AE significantly increased from T1 (AE<sub>sym%</sub> = 101.2% ± 55.4%) to T3 (AE<sub>sym%</sub> = 139.7% ± 54.8%). Compared to controls, AE for the ACLR knee was significantly smaller at T1 (P = 0.016). No other significant differences were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Smaller JPS errors at early rehabilitation while weight-bearing may have been due to heightened quadriceps activation and increased γ motor neuron sensitivity, compensating for deficient ACL mechanoreceptors. In contrast, non-weight-bearing testing did not reveal changes over time. Clinicians are advised to consider these distinctions when assessing proprioception at different rehabilitation stages.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49698,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy in Sport","volume":"70 ","pages":"Pages 53-60"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24001032/pdfft?md5=72aced5313823934651bfb60b8710310&pid=1-s2.0-S1466853X24001032-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24001032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Evaluate active knee joint position sense (JPS) throughout rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Design

Longitudinal.

Setting

Motion laboratory.

Participants

Twenty-two individuals post-ACLR and 22 activity-matched non-injured controls performed weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing knee JPS tests. The ACLR participants performed at three functional timepoints: T1, able to perform single-leg sit-to-stand; T2, able to hop maximally; T3, cleared for return to sports. Controls performed on one occasion.

Main outcome measures

Constant, absolute, variable errors (CE, AE, VE) and interlimb symmetry estimates (100% signifying perfect symmetry), for 40° and 65° knee flexion target angles.

Results

For the weight-bearing 40° condition, CE and AE of the ACLR knee significantly increased from T1 to T2 (P = 0.010) and T1 to T3 (P = 0.002). Consequently, interlimb asymmetry for AE significantly increased from T1 (AEsym% = 101.2% ± 55.4%) to T3 (AEsym% = 139.7% ± 54.8%). Compared to controls, AE for the ACLR knee was significantly smaller at T1 (P = 0.016). No other significant differences were observed.

Conclusions

Smaller JPS errors at early rehabilitation while weight-bearing may have been due to heightened quadriceps activation and increased γ motor neuron sensitivity, compensating for deficient ACL mechanoreceptors. In contrast, non-weight-bearing testing did not reveal changes over time. Clinicians are advised to consider these distinctions when assessing proprioception at different rehabilitation stages.

在前十字韧带重建术后的整个康复过程中,使用负重和非负重测试对膝关节本体感觉进行纵向评估
目的评估前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)后整个康复过程中膝关节的主动位置感(JPS)。ACLR 参与者在三个功能时间点进行了测试:T1,能够进行单腿坐立;T2,能够最大限度地跳跃;T3,可以恢复运动。主要结果测量40°和65°膝关节屈曲目标角的恒定、绝对、可变误差(CE、AE、VE)和肢间对称性估计值(100%表示完全对称)。结果对于负重40°条件,前交叉韧带损伤膝关节的CE和AE从T1到T2(P = 0.010)和T1到T3(P = 0.002)显著增加。因此,从T1(AEsym% = 101.2% ± 55.4%)到T3(AEsym% = 139.7% ± 54.8%),AE的肢间不对称性明显增加。与对照组相比,ACLR膝关节的AE在T1时明显较小(P = 0.016)。结论早期康复时,负重时的 JPS 误差较小可能是由于股四头肌激活增强和 γ 运动神经元灵敏度提高,弥补了前交叉韧带机械感受器的不足。相比之下,非负重测试并未显示出随时间推移而发生的变化。建议临床医生在不同康复阶段评估本体感觉时考虑这些区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Therapy in Sport
Physical Therapy in Sport 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
125
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy in Sport is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for the publication of research and clinical practice material relevant to the healthcare professions involved in sports and exercise medicine, and rehabilitation. The journal publishes material that is indispensable for day-to-day practice and continuing professional development. Physical Therapy in Sport covers topics dealing with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of injuries, as well as more general areas of sports and exercise medicine and related sports science. The journal publishes original research, case studies, reviews, masterclasses, papers on clinical approaches, and book reviews, as well as occasional reports from conferences. Papers are double-blind peer-reviewed by our international advisory board and other international experts, and submissions from a broad range of disciplines are actively encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信