Efficiency and safety of continuous theta burst stimulation for primary insomnia: A randomized clinical trial

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ximei Zhu , Serik Tabarak , Jianyu Que , Wei Yan , Xiao Lin , Xiaoxing Liu , Wenhao Chen , Jie Shi , Jiahui Deng , Lin Lu
{"title":"Efficiency and safety of continuous theta burst stimulation for primary insomnia: A randomized clinical trial","authors":"Ximei Zhu ,&nbsp;Serik Tabarak ,&nbsp;Jianyu Que ,&nbsp;Wei Yan ,&nbsp;Xiao Lin ,&nbsp;Xiaoxing Liu ,&nbsp;Wenhao Chen ,&nbsp;Jie Shi ,&nbsp;Jiahui Deng ,&nbsp;Lin Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.sleep.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Primary insomnia is a substantial public health burden, but current treatments for this disorder have limited effectiveness and adherence. Herein, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) for the treatment of primary insomnia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This two-armed, randomized, sham-controlled trial was conducted at Peking University Sixth Hospital and local community clinics. A total of 46 patients with primary insomnia were recruited and randomly allocated to either the cTBS group or sham group. Forty-one patients completed 10 sessions of cTBS or sham intervention and follow-up assessments.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After the intervention, the severity of insomnia was significantly lower in the cTBS group than in the sham group, with a large effect size (Cohen's d = −1.938). Additionally, 52.4 % of patients in the cTBS group achieved a response (Insomnia Severity Index score reduction ≥8), whereas only 4 % of patients in the sham group achieved a response. The duration of objective total sleep time and slow-wave sleep were higher in the cTBS group than in the sham group. The degree of anxiety was lower in the cTBS group than in the sham group. There were no significant differences in depression, sleepiness, or cognitive function between the cTBS and sham groups. During follow-up, the sleep quality of the cTBS group significantly improved and remained stable at the 6-month follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this randomized clinical trial, cTBS improved insomnia symptoms and was generally well tolerated, thus supporting the further development of cTBS for the treatment of primary insomnia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21874,"journal":{"name":"Sleep medicine","volume":"124 ","pages":"Pages 77-83"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945724004283","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Primary insomnia is a substantial public health burden, but current treatments for this disorder have limited effectiveness and adherence. Herein, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) for the treatment of primary insomnia.

Methods

This two-armed, randomized, sham-controlled trial was conducted at Peking University Sixth Hospital and local community clinics. A total of 46 patients with primary insomnia were recruited and randomly allocated to either the cTBS group or sham group. Forty-one patients completed 10 sessions of cTBS or sham intervention and follow-up assessments.

Results

After the intervention, the severity of insomnia was significantly lower in the cTBS group than in the sham group, with a large effect size (Cohen's d = −1.938). Additionally, 52.4 % of patients in the cTBS group achieved a response (Insomnia Severity Index score reduction ≥8), whereas only 4 % of patients in the sham group achieved a response. The duration of objective total sleep time and slow-wave sleep were higher in the cTBS group than in the sham group. The degree of anxiety was lower in the cTBS group than in the sham group. There were no significant differences in depression, sleepiness, or cognitive function between the cTBS and sham groups. During follow-up, the sleep quality of the cTBS group significantly improved and remained stable at the 6-month follow-up.

Conclusion

In this randomized clinical trial, cTBS improved insomnia symptoms and was generally well tolerated, thus supporting the further development of cTBS for the treatment of primary insomnia.

连续θ脉冲刺激治疗原发性失眠的效率和安全性:随机临床试验
目的原发性失眠是一种严重的公共卫生负担,但目前治疗这种疾病的方法在有效性和依从性方面都很有限。方法 在北京大学第六医院和当地社区诊所开展了这项双臂、随机、假对照试验。共招募了 46 名原发性失眠患者,并随机分配到 cTBS 组或假组。结果干预后,cTBS组患者的失眠严重程度明显低于假干预组,其效应大小较大(Cohen's d =-1.938)。此外,在 cTBS 组中,52.4% 的患者取得了疗效(失眠严重程度指数得分降低≥8),而在假干预组中,只有 4% 的患者取得了疗效。cTBS 组患者的客观总睡眠时间和慢波睡眠时间均高于假体组。cTBS 组患者的焦虑程度低于假体组。cTBS 组与假体组在抑郁、嗜睡或认知功能方面没有明显差异。在随访期间,cTBS 组的睡眠质量明显改善,并在 6 个月的随访中保持稳定。结论:在这项随机临床试验中,cTBS 改善了失眠症状,而且普遍具有良好的耐受性,因此支持进一步开发 cTBS 治疗原发性失眠症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep medicine
Sleep medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1060
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Sleep Medicine aims to be a journal no one involved in clinical sleep medicine can do without. A journal primarily focussing on the human aspects of sleep, integrating the various disciplines that are involved in sleep medicine: neurology, clinical neurophysiology, internal medicine (particularly pulmonology and cardiology), psychology, psychiatry, sleep technology, pediatrics, neurosurgery, otorhinolaryngology, and dentistry. The journal publishes the following types of articles: Reviews (also intended as a way to bridge the gap between basic sleep research and clinical relevance); Original Research Articles; Full-length articles; Brief communications; Controversies; Case reports; Letters to the Editor; Journal search and commentaries; Book reviews; Meeting announcements; Listing of relevant organisations plus web sites.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信