N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for treatment of catatonia in adults: Narrative review

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jeong Hoo Lee , Joji Suzuki
{"title":"N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for treatment of catatonia in adults: Narrative review","authors":"Jeong Hoo Lee ,&nbsp;Joji Suzuki","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>While the majority of patients with catatonia fully respond to benzodiazepines or ECT, some have a partial or no response. Benzodiazepines may be contraindicated such as when delirium co-exists. This review discusses the utility of NMDA receptor antagonists as alternatives to benzodiazepines in the treatment of catatonia in adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A PubMed search adhering to PRISMA guidelines was conducted for articles on NMDA receptor antagonists in catatonia treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-seven articles, including case reports and case series were identified. Amantadine (27 cases in 13 articles) and memantine (20 cases in 14 articles) were the most commonly reported agents. Amantadine, typically used as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy with benzodiazepines, showed quick responses. Memantine, used alone or with lorazepam, demonstrated rapid responses. A small number of cases (5 cases in 4 articles) reported successful use of ketamine and esketamine, highlighting their potential role in catatonia treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite limitations, NMDA receptor antagonists may be viable options when the patient is partially or not responsive to benzodiazepine, ECT is not available or may not be well tolerated, there is a concern for co-morbid delirium where benzodiazepines may be contraindicated. Further research is needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"91 ","pages":"Pages 60-65"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834324001944","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

While the majority of patients with catatonia fully respond to benzodiazepines or ECT, some have a partial or no response. Benzodiazepines may be contraindicated such as when delirium co-exists. This review discusses the utility of NMDA receptor antagonists as alternatives to benzodiazepines in the treatment of catatonia in adults.

Methods

A PubMed search adhering to PRISMA guidelines was conducted for articles on NMDA receptor antagonists in catatonia treatment.

Results

Thirty-seven articles, including case reports and case series were identified. Amantadine (27 cases in 13 articles) and memantine (20 cases in 14 articles) were the most commonly reported agents. Amantadine, typically used as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy with benzodiazepines, showed quick responses. Memantine, used alone or with lorazepam, demonstrated rapid responses. A small number of cases (5 cases in 4 articles) reported successful use of ketamine and esketamine, highlighting their potential role in catatonia treatment.

Conclusion

Despite limitations, NMDA receptor antagonists may be viable options when the patient is partially or not responsive to benzodiazepine, ECT is not available or may not be well tolerated, there is a concern for co-morbid delirium where benzodiazepines may be contraindicated. Further research is needed.

治疗成人紧张症的 N-甲基-d-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体拮抗剂:叙述性综述
目的虽然大多数紧张症患者对苯二氮卓类药物或电痉挛疗法完全有反应,但有些患者只有部分反应或没有反应。苯二氮卓类药物可能会有禁忌症,如同时出现谵妄。本综述讨论了 NMDA 受体拮抗剂作为苯二氮卓类药物的替代品在治疗成人紧张性精神障碍中的作用。金刚烷胺(13 篇文章 27 个病例)和美金刚(14 篇文章 20 个病例)是最常报道的药物。金刚烷胺通常作为单一疗法或与苯二氮卓类药物辅助治疗,反应迅速。单独使用或与劳拉西泮一起使用的美金刚也显示出快速反应。少数病例(4 篇文章中的 5 个病例)报告了氯胺酮和艾司氯胺酮的成功使用,突出了它们在紧张症治疗中的潜在作用。尽管存在局限性,但当患者对苯二氮卓类药物部分或无反应、无法使用电痉挛疗法或不能很好地耐受时,NMDA 受体拮抗剂可能是可行的选择。需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
General hospital psychiatry
General hospital psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
125
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信