Transcending Shallow Internationalization: Best Practices for Attaining Excellence in International Higher Education

IF 2.5 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Gerald W. Fry
{"title":"Transcending Shallow Internationalization: Best Practices for Attaining Excellence in International Higher Education","authors":"Gerald W. Fry","doi":"10.3390/educsci14090968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The context for this study is the volatile, turbulent, and disruptive environment that affects higher education everywhere. A plethora of key problems facing higher education are identified. Among these are escalating costs and declining public support for higher education. This means that international education must compete with other possible priorities, such as strengthening disciplines or making campuses more attractive to prospective students. The basic aim of this paper is to develop a set of best practices to promote excellence and rigor in international higher education. In that sense, this could be called action research. This could also be considered the story of how to develop excellence and rigor in international higher education. The major methodology for this study is multiple case studies research and mixed methods research. Another method is reflective participant experience based on the author’s seven decades of engagement with the internationalization of higher education. Both value premises and positionality, which might influence the research are openly shared. In terms of theoretical foundations, key genres of internationalization are identified and described, such as critical, comparative, and comprehensive internationalization. Then, in terms of results, in the next quantitative section of the paper, eight statistical tables are shared that show the current status of international higher education, primarily in the U.S., while also including a table showing the most international universities in the world. Then, in the next qualitative part of the study, 11 exemplary cases are presented, such as CAMPUS Asia, Volunteers in Asia (VIA), and the International Cooperative Learning Project. These projects involve a total of about 20 countries. The criteria for selection were factors such as depth, sustainability, and impactful, transformative learning. The paper concludes with an articulation of the best practices to achieve excellence in international education and the principle that true liberal education is inherently international and intercultural.","PeriodicalId":11472,"journal":{"name":"Education Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The context for this study is the volatile, turbulent, and disruptive environment that affects higher education everywhere. A plethora of key problems facing higher education are identified. Among these are escalating costs and declining public support for higher education. This means that international education must compete with other possible priorities, such as strengthening disciplines or making campuses more attractive to prospective students. The basic aim of this paper is to develop a set of best practices to promote excellence and rigor in international higher education. In that sense, this could be called action research. This could also be considered the story of how to develop excellence and rigor in international higher education. The major methodology for this study is multiple case studies research and mixed methods research. Another method is reflective participant experience based on the author’s seven decades of engagement with the internationalization of higher education. Both value premises and positionality, which might influence the research are openly shared. In terms of theoretical foundations, key genres of internationalization are identified and described, such as critical, comparative, and comprehensive internationalization. Then, in terms of results, in the next quantitative section of the paper, eight statistical tables are shared that show the current status of international higher education, primarily in the U.S., while also including a table showing the most international universities in the world. Then, in the next qualitative part of the study, 11 exemplary cases are presented, such as CAMPUS Asia, Volunteers in Asia (VIA), and the International Cooperative Learning Project. These projects involve a total of about 20 countries. The criteria for selection were factors such as depth, sustainability, and impactful, transformative learning. The paper concludes with an articulation of the best practices to achieve excellence in international education and the principle that true liberal education is inherently international and intercultural.
超越浅层次的国际化:实现卓越国际高等教育的最佳实践
本研究的背景是影响各地高等教育的多变、动荡和破坏性环境。高等教育面临的主要问题层出不穷。其中包括成本上升和公众对高等教育的支持减少。这意味着国际教育必须与其他可能的优先事项竞争,如加强学科建设或提高校园对未来学生的吸引力。本文的基本目的是制定一套最佳做法,以促进国际高等教育的卓越性和严谨性。从这个意义上讲,这可以被称为行动研究。这也可以被视为如何在国际高等教育中发展卓越和严谨的故事。本研究的主要方法是多案例研究和混合方法研究。另一种方法是基于作者参与高等教育国际化七十年的反思性参与者经验。作者公开分享了可能影响研究的价值前提和立场。在理论基础方面,确定并描述了国际化的主要流派,如批判性国际化、比较国际化和综合国际化。然后,在结果方面,在论文接下来的定量部分,分享了八个统计表,显示了国际高等教育的现状,主要是在美国,同时还包括一个显示世界上国际化程度最高的大学的表格。然后,在研究的下一个定性部分,介绍了 11 个典范案例,如 CAMPUS Asia、Volunteers in Asia (VIA) 和 International Cooperative Learning Project。这些项目共涉及约 20 个国家。选择的标准是深度、可持续性、有影响的变革性学习等因素。本文最后阐述了实现卓越国际教育的最佳做法,以及真正的通识教育本质上是国际化和跨文化的这一原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education Sciences
Education Sciences Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
770
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信