COOMET key comparison COOMET.PR-K1.a.2018 for spectral irradiance 250 nm to 2500 nmm, final report

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
B B Khlevnoy, M V Solodilov, S S Kolesnikova, D A Otryaskin, I V Korseko, S V Nikanenka, M V Huriev, F Sametoğlu
{"title":"COOMET key comparison COOMET.PR-K1.a.2018 for spectral irradiance 250 nm to 2500 nmm, final report","authors":"B B Khlevnoy, M V Solodilov, S S Kolesnikova, D A Otryaskin, I V Korseko, S V Nikanenka, M V Huriev, F Sametoğlu","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/02001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<title>Main text</title>This report describes the Key Comparison COOMET.R-K1.a.2018 for spectral irradiance in the wavelength range of 250 nm to 2500 nm, conducted by the Regional Metrology Organization \"Euro-Asian Cooperation of National Metrological Institutions\" (COOMET). The comparison was, in fact, a combination of three bilateral comparisons with the same link/pilot laboratory - the All-Russian Research Institute for Optical and Physical Measurements (VNIIOFI), the Russian Federation. The non-link laboratories were the Belarusian State Institute of Metrology (BelGIM), Belarus, the National Scientific Centre \"Institute of Metrology\" (NSC IM), Ukraine, and the National Metrology Institute of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK UME), Türkiye.The aim of the comparison was to link the BelGIM, NSC IM and TÜBİTAK UME measurement results to the CIPM key comparison CCPR-K1.a.2017, conducted by the Consultative Committee for Photometry and Radiometry (CCPR).Tungsten quartz halogen lamps of the FEL type (1000 W) were used as artefacts. Each participant used its own set of lamps. The sequence of measurements was <italic toggle=\"yes\">participant - pilot - participant</italic>. The pilot measurements of the described here COOMET comparison were performed in a short time (within three months) after completing the measurements of CCPR-K1.a.2017, where VNIIOFI also was a pilot, which provided a high quality link.NSC IM performed measurements in the full spectral range, from 250 nm to 2500 nm, while BelGIM and TÜBİTAK UME managed to cover the range from 250 nm to 1100 nm only.The analysis of the comparison was performed following the approach described in the Appendix A of the Guidelines for CCPR and RMO Bilateral Key Comparisons (CCPR-G5). Differences from KCRV of BelGIM and TÜBİTAK UME, for the most of the measured wavelengths, do not exceed 2% and are within the expanded uncertainties. For NSC IM the differences from KCRV are within or comparable with the uncertainties in the IR range, from 900 nm to 2500 nm, but become larger with decreasing wavelength in the visible and UV reaching 9% at 250 nm.To reach the main text of this paper, click on <ext-link xlink:href=\"https://www.bipm.org/documents/d/guest/coomet-pr-k1a-2018\" xlink:type=\"simple\">Final Report</ext-link>. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database <ext-link xlink:href=\"https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/\" xlink:type=\"simple\">https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/</ext-link>.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCPR, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metrologia","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/02001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Main textThis report describes the Key Comparison COOMET.R-K1.a.2018 for spectral irradiance in the wavelength range of 250 nm to 2500 nm, conducted by the Regional Metrology Organization "Euro-Asian Cooperation of National Metrological Institutions" (COOMET). The comparison was, in fact, a combination of three bilateral comparisons with the same link/pilot laboratory - the All-Russian Research Institute for Optical and Physical Measurements (VNIIOFI), the Russian Federation. The non-link laboratories were the Belarusian State Institute of Metrology (BelGIM), Belarus, the National Scientific Centre "Institute of Metrology" (NSC IM), Ukraine, and the National Metrology Institute of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK UME), Türkiye.The aim of the comparison was to link the BelGIM, NSC IM and TÜBİTAK UME measurement results to the CIPM key comparison CCPR-K1.a.2017, conducted by the Consultative Committee for Photometry and Radiometry (CCPR).Tungsten quartz halogen lamps of the FEL type (1000 W) were used as artefacts. Each participant used its own set of lamps. The sequence of measurements was participant - pilot - participant. The pilot measurements of the described here COOMET comparison were performed in a short time (within three months) after completing the measurements of CCPR-K1.a.2017, where VNIIOFI also was a pilot, which provided a high quality link.NSC IM performed measurements in the full spectral range, from 250 nm to 2500 nm, while BelGIM and TÜBİTAK UME managed to cover the range from 250 nm to 1100 nm only.The analysis of the comparison was performed following the approach described in the Appendix A of the Guidelines for CCPR and RMO Bilateral Key Comparisons (CCPR-G5). Differences from KCRV of BelGIM and TÜBİTAK UME, for the most of the measured wavelengths, do not exceed 2% and are within the expanded uncertainties. For NSC IM the differences from KCRV are within or comparable with the uncertainties in the IR range, from 900 nm to 2500 nm, but become larger with decreasing wavelength in the visible and UV reaching 9% at 250 nm.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCPR, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
COOMET 关键比较 COOMET.PR-K1.a.2018(光谱辐照度 250 nm 至 2500 nmm),最终报告
正文本报告介绍了 "欧亚国家计量机构合作 "区域计量组织(COOMET)针对波长范围为 250 纳米至 2500 纳米的光谱辐照度开展的 COOMET.R-K1.a.2018 关键比对。事实上,此次比对是三次双边比对的组合,比对实验室是同一个联系/试点实验室--俄罗斯联邦全俄光学和物理测量研究所(VNIIOFI)。非链接实验室是白俄罗斯的白俄罗斯国家计量研究院(BelGIM)、乌克兰的国家科学中心 "计量研究院"(NSC IM)和土耳其的土耳其国家计量研究院(TÜBİTAK UME)。比对的目的是将白俄罗斯国家计量研究院(BelGIM)、乌克兰国家科学中心 "计量研究院"(NSC IM)和土耳其国家计量研究院(TÜBİTAK UME)的测量结果与光电咨询委员会开展的 CIPM 关键比对 CCPR-K1.a.2017 联系起来、光度和辐射度量咨询委员会(CCPR)进行的 CCPR-K1.a.2017 关键比对。每个参与者都使用自己的灯具。测量顺序为参与者-试验者-参与者。这里描述的 COOMET 对比试验测量是在完成 CCPR-K1.a.2017 测量后的短时间内(三个月内)进行的、NSC IM 在 250 nm 至 2500 nm 的全光谱范围内进行了测量,而 BelGIM 和 TÜBİTAK UME 只覆盖了 250 nm 至 1100 nm 的范围。在大多数测量波长上,BelGIM 和 TÜBİTAK UME 的 KCRV 差异不超过 2%,且在扩大的不确定性范围内。对于 NSC IM,KCRV 与红外波长范围(900 nm 至 2500 nm)内的不确定度的差值不超过或与不确定度相当,但随着可见光和紫外波长的减小而增大,在 250 nm 时达到 9%。请注意,此文本为 BIPM 关键比对数据库附录 B 中的文本 https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The 根据 CIPM 互认安排 (CIPM MRA) 的规定,最终报告已通过同行评审,并批准由 CCPR 出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Metrologia
Metrologia 工程技术-物理:应用
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published 6 times per year, Metrologia covers the fundamentals of measurements, particularly those dealing with the seven base units of the International System of Units (metre, kilogram, second, ampere, kelvin, candela, mole) or proposals to replace them. The journal also publishes papers that contribute to the solution of difficult measurement problems and improve the accuracy of derived units and constants that are of fundamental importance to physics. In addition to regular papers, the journal publishes review articles, issues devoted to single topics of timely interest and occasional conference proceedings. Letters to the Editor and Short Communications (generally three pages or less) are also considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信