Conducting research within the acronym: Problematizing LGBTIQ+ research in psychology

IF 4 1区社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Journal of Social Issues Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1111/josi.12634

Amanda Klysing, Marta Prandelli, Miguel Roselló‐Peñaloza, Daniel Alonso, Madison Gray, Jessica J. Glazier, Sarah Swanson, Yu‐Chi Wang

{"title":"Conducting research within the acronym: Problematizing LGBTIQ+ research in psychology","authors":"Amanda Klysing, Marta Prandelli, Miguel Roselló‐Peñaloza, Daniel Alonso, Madison Gray, Jessica J. Glazier, Sarah Swanson, Yu‐Chi Wang","doi":"10.1111/josi.12634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"LGBTIQ+ research acknowledges shared experiences of groups marginalized due to gender identities, sexualities, and sex characteristics. This universalist coalition approach has resulted in much affirmational research and progressive policy development. However, it risks homogenizing the unique experiences and needs of specific groups; a risk lessened by a particularist subgroup approach. In this theoretical paper, we reflect on the challenges of a coalition or subgroup approach by considering interdependencies and boundaries between sex, gender, and sexuality‐based identities. Through tracing the historical development of LGBTIQ+ research and activism and using examples from intersex studies, intersectionality, and political actions, we explore tensions between the collective identities that make up the LGBTIQ+ acronym. We further offer suggestions for reimagining LGBTIQ+ research, advocating for community‐driven approaches that respect the situated knowledge of LGBTIQ+ individuals, and use adaptable and inclusive research practices that bridge academia and activism that aim to improve the lives of the marginalized.","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12634","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

LGBTIQ+ research acknowledges shared experiences of groups marginalized due to gender identities, sexualities, and sex characteristics. This universalist coalition approach has resulted in much affirmational research and progressive policy development. However, it risks homogenizing the unique experiences and needs of specific groups; a risk lessened by a particularist subgroup approach. In this theoretical paper, we reflect on the challenges of a coalition or subgroup approach by considering interdependencies and boundaries between sex, gender, and sexuality‐based identities. Through tracing the historical development of LGBTIQ+ research and activism and using examples from intersex studies, intersectionality, and political actions, we explore tensions between the collective identities that make up the LGBTIQ+ acronym. We further offer suggestions for reimagining LGBTIQ+ research, advocating for community‐driven approaches that respect the situated knowledge of LGBTIQ+ individuals, and use adaptable and inclusive research practices that bridge academia and activism that aim to improve the lives of the marginalized.

查看原文本刊更多论文

在缩写范围内开展研究：心理学中的 LGBTIQ+ 研究问题化

LGBTIQ+ 研究承认因性别认同、性行为和性特征而被边缘化群体的共同经历。这种普遍主义的联合方法促成了许多平权研究和进步政策的制定。然而，这种方法有可能将特定群体的独特经历和需求同质化；而特殊主义的亚群体方法则降低了这种风险。在这篇理论文章中，我们通过考虑基于性、性别和性行为的身份之间的相互依存关系和界限，反思了联盟或亚群体方法所面临的挑战。通过追溯 LGBTIQ+ 研究和活动的历史发展，并利用双性人研究、交叉性和政治行动中的实例，我们探讨了构成 LGBTIQ+ 缩写的集体身份之间的紧张关系。我们进一步提出了重新构想 LGBTIQ+ 研究的建议，倡导以社区为导向的方法，尊重 LGBTIQ+ 个人的情景知识，并采用适应性和包容性的研究实践，在旨在改善边缘化群体生活的学术界和行动主义之间架起桥梁。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Social Issues Multiple-

CiteScore

9.70

自引率

7.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Published for The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI), the Journal of Social Issues (JSI) brings behavioral and social science theory, empirical evidence, and practice to bear on human and social problems. Each issue of the journal focuses on a single topic - recent issues, for example, have addressed poverty, housing and health; privacy as a social and psychological concern; youth and violence; and the impact of social class on education.

文献相关原料

公司名称	产品信息	采购帮参考价格