Personalized embryo transfer guided by rsERT with hourly precision improves pregnancy outcomes in patients with a receptive window of implantation: a pilot study

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Tianli Yang, Zhaojuan Hou, Qiong Zhang, Jing Zhao, Nenghui Liu, Donge Liu, Yumei Li, Yonggang Wang, Bin Xu, Yangyun Zou, Cheng Wan, Yanping Li
{"title":"Personalized embryo transfer guided by rsERT with hourly precision improves pregnancy outcomes in patients with a receptive window of implantation: a pilot study","authors":"Tianli Yang, Zhaojuan Hou, Qiong Zhang, Jing Zhao, Nenghui Liu, Donge Liu, Yumei Li, Yonggang Wang, Bin Xu, Yangyun Zou, Cheng Wan, Yanping Li","doi":"10.1007/s10815-024-03246-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To investigate whether personalized embryo transfer (pET) predicted by a modified RNA-sequencing-based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) model can improve intrauterine pregnancy rate (IPR) in patients with a receptive window of implantation (WOI).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Design</h3><p>A retrospective pilot study was conducted in the Center for Reproductive Medicine, Central South University, from January 2018 to December 2023. A total of 524 patients with receptive WOI results from rsERT were assigned into two groups based on whether they underwent conventional embryo transfer (conventional ET) or pET. Patients in the conventional ET were matched with those in the pET group at a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching (PSM).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Before PSM, the IPR (55.73% vs. 46.19%, <i>P</i> = 0.032) and implantation rate (IR) (47.51% vs. 34.03%, <i>P</i> = 0.000) in the pET group were significantly higher than that in the conventional ET group. However, the number and types of transferred embryos differed significantly between the two groups. After adjusting for confounding factors, IPR (57.38% vs. 44.81, <i>P</i> = 0.016) and IR (46.81% vs. 33.10%, <i>P</i> = 0.001) remained significantly higher in the pET group compared to the conventional ET group. The implantation failure rate was significantly lower in the pET group compared to controls (42.62% vs. 55.19%, <i>P</i> = 0.016). Additionally, the multiple-pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the pET group compared to the conventional ET group (10.29% vs. 1.68%, <i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Women with receptive WOI results could benefit from the receptivity-timed pET predicted by the newly refined rsERT. These findings provide a basis for future research in precision medicine for embryo transfer.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03246-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate whether personalized embryo transfer (pET) predicted by a modified RNA-sequencing-based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) model can improve intrauterine pregnancy rate (IPR) in patients with a receptive window of implantation (WOI).

Design

A retrospective pilot study was conducted in the Center for Reproductive Medicine, Central South University, from January 2018 to December 2023. A total of 524 patients with receptive WOI results from rsERT were assigned into two groups based on whether they underwent conventional embryo transfer (conventional ET) or pET. Patients in the conventional ET were matched with those in the pET group at a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching (PSM).

Results

Before PSM, the IPR (55.73% vs. 46.19%, P = 0.032) and implantation rate (IR) (47.51% vs. 34.03%, P = 0.000) in the pET group were significantly higher than that in the conventional ET group. However, the number and types of transferred embryos differed significantly between the two groups. After adjusting for confounding factors, IPR (57.38% vs. 44.81, P = 0.016) and IR (46.81% vs. 33.10%, P = 0.001) remained significantly higher in the pET group compared to the conventional ET group. The implantation failure rate was significantly lower in the pET group compared to controls (42.62% vs. 55.19%, P = 0.016). Additionally, the multiple-pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the pET group compared to the conventional ET group (10.29% vs. 1.68%, P = 0.001).

Conclusions

Women with receptive WOI results could benefit from the receptivity-timed pET predicted by the newly refined rsERT. These findings provide a basis for future research in precision medicine for embryo transfer.

由 rsERT 每小时精确引导的个性化胚胎移植改善了有接受着床窗口患者的妊娠结局:一项试点研究
目的探讨基于改良RNA测序的子宫内膜受孕率检测(rsERT)模型预测的个性化胚胎移植(pET)是否能提高受孕着床窗(WOI)患者的宫内妊娠率(IPR).设计2018年1月至2023年12月,中南大学生殖医学中心开展了一项回顾性试验研究。根据患者是否接受传统胚胎移植(传统 ET)或 pET,将 524 名 rsERT 结果为可接受 WOI 的患者分为两组。结果在PSM之前,pET组的IPR(55.73% vs. 46.19%,P = 0.032)和植入率(IR)(47.51% vs. 34.03%,P = 0.000)明显高于常规ET组。然而,两组移植胚胎的数量和类型差异很大。调整混杂因素后,pET 组的 IPR(57.38% 对 44.81,P = 0.016)和 IR(46.81% 对 33.10%,P = 0.001)仍明显高于常规 ET 组。与对照组相比,pET 组的植入失败率明显降低(42.62% 对 55.19%,P = 0.016)。此外,与传统 ET 组相比,pET 组的多胎妊娠率明显更高(10.29% 对 1.68%,P = 0.001)。这些发现为未来胚胎移植的精准医学研究提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信