Elevated thrombin generation and VTE incidence in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC compared with minimally invasive rectal surgery.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Mikkel Lundbech,Andreas Engel Krag,Lene Hjerrild Iversen,Birgitte Brandsborg,Nina Madsen,Anne-Mette Hvas
{"title":"Elevated thrombin generation and VTE incidence in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC compared with minimally invasive rectal surgery.","authors":"Mikkel Lundbech,Andreas Engel Krag,Lene Hjerrild Iversen,Birgitte Brandsborg,Nina Madsen,Anne-Mette Hvas","doi":"10.1055/a-2413-4989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Surgical treatment of colorectal cancer carries a risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). We investigated changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis and the VTE incidence within 30 days in patients undergoing open cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS+HIPEC) for peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for localized rectal cancer. METHODS This cohort study included 45 CRS+HIPEC and 45 MIS patients. Blood samples were obtained preoperatively, at the end of surgery, and postoperative day (POD) 1, 3-4, and 5-7. Systematic ultrasonographic screening for VTE was performed between POD 3-7. Computed tomography scan was performed if complications were suspected. The primary endpoint was the difference in mean change ( with [95% confidence intervals] from preoperative to end of surgery in prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) levels. Secondary endpoints were the difference in mean change in biomarkers of coagulation and fibrinolysis from preoperative to POD 5-7, and the VTE incidence. RESULTS F1+2 levels increased from preoperative to the end of surgery in both groups. The mean increase from preoperative to end of surgery in F1+2 levels was significantly greater in CRS+HIPEC patients than MIS patients: 1322 [1040:1604] pmol/l, P = 0.001. The VTE incidence was significantly higher after CRS+HIPEC than MIS (24% vs. 5%, P = 0.012). CONCLUSION F1+2 levels were increased after both procedures, but to a far greater extent following CRS+HIPEC. The VTE incidence within 30 days was significantly higher in patients treated with CRS+HIPEC than in MIS patients.","PeriodicalId":23036,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis and haemostasis","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis and haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2413-4989","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Surgical treatment of colorectal cancer carries a risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). We investigated changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis and the VTE incidence within 30 days in patients undergoing open cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS+HIPEC) for peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for localized rectal cancer. METHODS This cohort study included 45 CRS+HIPEC and 45 MIS patients. Blood samples were obtained preoperatively, at the end of surgery, and postoperative day (POD) 1, 3-4, and 5-7. Systematic ultrasonographic screening for VTE was performed between POD 3-7. Computed tomography scan was performed if complications were suspected. The primary endpoint was the difference in mean change ( with [95% confidence intervals] from preoperative to end of surgery in prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) levels. Secondary endpoints were the difference in mean change in biomarkers of coagulation and fibrinolysis from preoperative to POD 5-7, and the VTE incidence. RESULTS F1+2 levels increased from preoperative to the end of surgery in both groups. The mean increase from preoperative to end of surgery in F1+2 levels was significantly greater in CRS+HIPEC patients than MIS patients: 1322 [1040:1604] pmol/l, P = 0.001. The VTE incidence was significantly higher after CRS+HIPEC than MIS (24% vs. 5%, P = 0.012). CONCLUSION F1+2 levels were increased after both procedures, but to a far greater extent following CRS+HIPEC. The VTE incidence within 30 days was significantly higher in patients treated with CRS+HIPEC than in MIS patients.
与微创直肠手术相比,接受 HIPEC 细胞切除手术的患者凝血酶生成和 VTE 发生率升高。
导言:结直肠癌手术治疗存在静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)风险。我们研究了因结直肠癌腹膜转移而接受开腹细胞减灭术加腹腔内热化疗(CRS+HIPEC)以及因局部直肠癌而接受微创手术(MIS)的患者的凝血和纤溶变化以及 30 天内的 VTE 发生率。方法:这项队列研究包括 45 名 CRS+HIPEC 和 45 名 MIS 患者。在术前、手术结束、术后第 1 天、第 3-4 天和第 5-7 天采集血液样本。在 POD 3-7 期间对 VTE 进行了系统的超声波筛查。如果怀疑有并发症,则进行计算机断层扫描。主要终点是凝血酶原片段1+2(F1+2)水平从术前到手术结束的平均变化差异(,[95% 置信区间])。次要终点是凝血和纤溶生物标志物从术前到 POD 5-7 的平均变化差异以及 VTE 发生率。结果 两组患者的 F1+2 水平从术前到手术结束均有所上升。CRS+HIPEC患者的F1+2水平从术前到手术结束的平均增幅明显高于MIS患者:1322 [1040:1604] pmol/l,P = 0.001。CRS+HIPEC术后VTE发生率明显高于MIS术(24% vs. 5%,P = 0.012)。结论 两种手术后 F1+2 水平都会升高,但 CRS+HIPEC 的升高幅度更大。接受 CRS+HIPEC 治疗的患者 30 天内的 VTE 发生率明显高于 MIS 患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thrombosis and haemostasis
Thrombosis and haemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
9.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Thrombosis and Haemostasis publishes reports on basic, translational and clinical research dedicated to novel results and highest quality in any area of thrombosis and haemostasis, vascular biology and medicine, inflammation and infection, platelet and leukocyte biology, from genetic, molecular & cellular studies, diagnostic, therapeutic & preventative studies to high-level translational and clinical research. The journal provides position and guideline papers, state-of-the-art papers, expert analysis and commentaries, and dedicated theme issues covering recent developments and key topics in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信