Business process management and digitalization – a reciprocal relationship

IF 4.5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Jon Iden, Kjersti Berg Danilova, Tom Eikebrokk
{"title":"Business process management and digitalization – a reciprocal relationship","authors":"Jon Iden, Kjersti Berg Danilova, Tom Eikebrokk","doi":"10.1108/bpmj-02-2024-0083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study investigated the interplay between business process management (BPM) and digitalization in organizations and developed principles for designing their interaction.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study was explorative and used a questionnaire-based survey that involved experts in BPM and digitalization who were actively engaged in these two domains in their organizations to come up with the design principles. The survey and the design principles were based on Rosemann and vom Brocke's (2010) six core elements of BPM.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Digitalization was seen as influencing how BPM is practiced in organizations by strengthening organizations’ focus on BPM, and conversely, BPM was perceived as beneficial for digitalization and digitalization outcomes. In addition, based on Rosemann and vom Brocke’s six core elements of BPM, we proposed six principles for designing the interplay of BPM and digitalization in organizations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>Our empirical investigation was situated in a Norwegian context and included 104 respondents. While we have no reason to believe that our findings should not be valid and useful in other regions, this is a limitation in generalizing our findings, and a natural follow-up would be to investigate our research questions in other geographical areas. We are also aware of the potential response bias in our sample. Moreover, to outline the principles for designing the interactions of BPM and digitalization, we applied the six core elements of BPM by Rosemann and vom Brocke (2010) as our theoretical lens. We acknowledge that there are more issues related to the interplay of BPM and digitalization than we have dealt with in this study.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This study has several implications for organizations. First, managers may use our proposed design principles to decide how to integrate BPM and digitalization. Second, although this study showed that each discipline nurtures its own culture, building an organizational culture that combines values from each discipline can enable a process-oriented organization to innovate its operations and services with digital technology. Third, managers should align the responsibilities and tasks of process owners with the demands for the digitalization of business processes. Fourth, managers, when integrating BPM and digitalization, should take care not to impede the generative attributes of each discipline.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>Processes and digital technologies play important roles in society at all levels. BPM seeks to understand how processes unfold and explores how new practices may better serve individuals, organizations and society (vom Brocke <em>et al</em>., 2021), while digitalization is concerned with how various kinds of modern digital technologies may trigger organizational and social changes (Markus and Rowe, 2023; Suri and Jack, 2016).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study is one of the first studies to investigate the interplay between BPM and digitalization – how digitalization affects BPM practices in organizations and how BPM influences digitalization outcomes. In addition, this study offers novel principles for designing the interaction between BPM and digitalization.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47964,"journal":{"name":"Business Process Management Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Process Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-02-2024-0083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigated the interplay between business process management (BPM) and digitalization in organizations and developed principles for designing their interaction.

Design/methodology/approach

This study was explorative and used a questionnaire-based survey that involved experts in BPM and digitalization who were actively engaged in these two domains in their organizations to come up with the design principles. The survey and the design principles were based on Rosemann and vom Brocke's (2010) six core elements of BPM.

Findings

Digitalization was seen as influencing how BPM is practiced in organizations by strengthening organizations’ focus on BPM, and conversely, BPM was perceived as beneficial for digitalization and digitalization outcomes. In addition, based on Rosemann and vom Brocke’s six core elements of BPM, we proposed six principles for designing the interplay of BPM and digitalization in organizations.

Research limitations/implications

Our empirical investigation was situated in a Norwegian context and included 104 respondents. While we have no reason to believe that our findings should not be valid and useful in other regions, this is a limitation in generalizing our findings, and a natural follow-up would be to investigate our research questions in other geographical areas. We are also aware of the potential response bias in our sample. Moreover, to outline the principles for designing the interactions of BPM and digitalization, we applied the six core elements of BPM by Rosemann and vom Brocke (2010) as our theoretical lens. We acknowledge that there are more issues related to the interplay of BPM and digitalization than we have dealt with in this study.

Practical implications

This study has several implications for organizations. First, managers may use our proposed design principles to decide how to integrate BPM and digitalization. Second, although this study showed that each discipline nurtures its own culture, building an organizational culture that combines values from each discipline can enable a process-oriented organization to innovate its operations and services with digital technology. Third, managers should align the responsibilities and tasks of process owners with the demands for the digitalization of business processes. Fourth, managers, when integrating BPM and digitalization, should take care not to impede the generative attributes of each discipline.

Social implications

Processes and digital technologies play important roles in society at all levels. BPM seeks to understand how processes unfold and explores how new practices may better serve individuals, organizations and society (vom Brocke et al., 2021), while digitalization is concerned with how various kinds of modern digital technologies may trigger organizational and social changes (Markus and Rowe, 2023; Suri and Jack, 2016).

Originality/value

This study is one of the first studies to investigate the interplay between BPM and digitalization – how digitalization affects BPM practices in organizations and how BPM influences digitalization outcomes. In addition, this study offers novel principles for designing the interaction between BPM and digitalization.

业务流程管理与数字化--一种互惠关系
目的 本研究调查了组织中业务流程管理(BPM)与数字化之间的相互作用,并制定了设计二者互动的原则。设计/方法/途径 本研究是一项探索性研究,采用了基于问卷的调查方法,调查对象是组织中积极参与业务流程管理和数字化这两个领域的专家,以制定设计原则。调查和设计原则以 Rosemann 和 vom Brocke(2010 年)的业务流程管理六大核心要素为基础。研究结果数字化被认为通过加强组织对业务流程管理的关注而影响了组织中业务流程管理的实践方式,反之,业务流程管理被认为有利于数字化和数字化成果。此外,根据Rosemann和Vom Brocke提出的业务流程管理的六个核心要素,我们提出了设计组织内业务流程管理和数字化之间相互作用的六项原则。 研究局限/影响我们的实证调查是在挪威的背景下进行的,包括104名受访者。虽然我们没有理由认为,我们的研究结果在其他地区不一定有效和有用,但这也是我们在推广研究结果方面的一个局限,因此,我们的后续工作自然是在其他地区调查我们的研究问题。我们也意识到,我们的样本可能存在反应偏差。此外,为了概括设计业务流程管理与数字化互动的原则,我们采用了 Rosemann 和 vom Brocke(2010 年)提出的业务流程管理六大核心要素作为我们的理论视角。我们承认,与业务流程管理和数字化的相互作用相关的问题比我们在本研究中所涉及的要多得多。 实际意义本研究对企业有几方面的意义。首先,管理人员可以利用我们提出的设计原则来决定如何整合业务流程管理和数字化。其次,尽管本研究表明,每个学科都孕育着自己的文化,但建立一种结合了每个学科价值观的组织文化,能让以流程为导向的组织利用数字技术创新其运营和服务。第三,管理者应将流程所有者的职责和任务与业务流程数字化的需求相一致。第四,管理者在整合业务流程管理和数字化时,应注意不要妨碍每门学科的生成属性。社会影响流程和数字技术在社会的各个层面都发挥着重要作用。业务流程管理旨在了解流程如何展开,并探索新的实践如何更好地服务于个人、组织和社会(vom Brocke 等人,2021 年),而数字化则关注各种现代数字技术如何引发组织和社会变革(Markus 和 Rowe,2023 年;Suri 和 Jack,2016 年)。原创性/价值本研究是首批研究业务流程管理与数字化之间相互作用的研究之一,即数字化如何影响组织中的业务流程管理实践,以及业务流程管理如何影响数字化成果。此外,本研究还为设计业务流程管理与数字化之间的互动提供了新颖的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.80%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Business processes are a fundamental building block of organizational success. Even though effectively managing business process is a key activity for business prosperity, there remain considerable gaps in understanding how to drive efficiency through a process approach. Building a clear and deep understanding of the range process, how they function, and how to manage them is the major challenge facing modern business. Business Process Management Journal (BPMJ) examines how a variety of business processes intrinsic to organizational efficiency and effectiveness are integrated and managed for competitive success. BPMJ builds a deep appreciation of how to manage business processes effectively by disseminating best practice. Coverage includes: BPM in eBusiness, eCommerce and eGovernment Web-based enterprise application integration eBPM, ERP, CRM, ASP & SCM Knowledge management and learning organization Methodologies, techniques and tools of business process modeling, analysis and design Techniques of moving from one-shot business process re-engineering to continuous improvement Best practices in BPM Performance management Tools and techniques of change management BPM case studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信