The Leaching Potential and Recovery of 15-N-Fertilizer by Sugarcane Cultivated in Sandy Soil

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Ariane Márcia de Sousa Silva, Emídio Cantídio Almeida de Oliveira, Joel José de Andrade, Amanda Michele Santos Lima, Brivaldo Gomes de Almeida, Paulo Cesar Ocheuze Trivelin, Fernando José Freire, Dante Hugo Guimarães
{"title":"The Leaching Potential and Recovery of 15-N-Fertilizer by Sugarcane Cultivated in Sandy Soil","authors":"Ariane Márcia de Sousa Silva, Emídio Cantídio Almeida de Oliveira, Joel José de Andrade, Amanda Michele Santos Lima, Brivaldo Gomes de Almeida, Paulo Cesar Ocheuze Trivelin, Fernando José Freire, Dante Hugo Guimarães","doi":"10.1007/s12355-024-01479-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Leaching is an important loss pathway that limits N-fertilizer recovery by sugarcane. Our study evaluated the potential for leaching and recovery of <sup>15</sup>N-fertilizer by sugarcane cultivated in sandy soil. Three nitrogen fertilization management strategies were tested: single dose (80 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>), split (40 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> + 40 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and supplementation (80 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> + 40 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>), one more control; without nitrogen (N). Ammonium nitrate (AN) and ammonium sulphate (AS) were the sources N used. Leaching was determined by the N-mineral concentration (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>, NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>) and <sup>15</sup>N-fertilizer in the soil solution at a depth of 0.7 m. Nitrogen recovery was quantified using <sup>15</sup>N-fertilizer in the sugarcane shoots. Significant leaching occurred in the first 60 days after fertilization (DAF), but splitting the fertilization reduced N-mineral leaching by 50%. During this period, 78% of the nitrogen in the leachate originated from the fertilizer (NDFF<sub>(L)</sub>). The contribution of nitrogen fertilization was highest in the first 30 DAF, where the fertilizer accounted for 39% of the nitrogen absorbed by sugarcane. But the plant’s nitrogen recovery (R) was limited to only 4% of the applied nitrogen. At harvest, the R of <sup>15</sup>N-fertilizer by sugarcane was less than 20%. Splitting or applying a single dose of fertilizer did not improve nitrogen recovery at the end of the cycle. Our study showed that the leaching and recovery of <sup>15</sup>N-fertilizer were found to be proportional to the applied doses according to the management strategies and nitrogen sources compensated for nitrogen leaching throughout the cycle.</p>","PeriodicalId":781,"journal":{"name":"Sugar Tech","volume":"168 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sugar Tech","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-024-01479-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leaching is an important loss pathway that limits N-fertilizer recovery by sugarcane. Our study evaluated the potential for leaching and recovery of 15N-fertilizer by sugarcane cultivated in sandy soil. Three nitrogen fertilization management strategies were tested: single dose (80 kg ha−1), split (40 kg ha−1 + 40 kg ha−1) and supplementation (80 kg ha−1 + 40 kg ha−1), one more control; without nitrogen (N). Ammonium nitrate (AN) and ammonium sulphate (AS) were the sources N used. Leaching was determined by the N-mineral concentration (NH4+, NO2 and NO3) and 15N-fertilizer in the soil solution at a depth of 0.7 m. Nitrogen recovery was quantified using 15N-fertilizer in the sugarcane shoots. Significant leaching occurred in the first 60 days after fertilization (DAF), but splitting the fertilization reduced N-mineral leaching by 50%. During this period, 78% of the nitrogen in the leachate originated from the fertilizer (NDFF(L)). The contribution of nitrogen fertilization was highest in the first 30 DAF, where the fertilizer accounted for 39% of the nitrogen absorbed by sugarcane. But the plant’s nitrogen recovery (R) was limited to only 4% of the applied nitrogen. At harvest, the R of 15N-fertilizer by sugarcane was less than 20%. Splitting or applying a single dose of fertilizer did not improve nitrogen recovery at the end of the cycle. Our study showed that the leaching and recovery of 15N-fertilizer were found to be proportional to the applied doses according to the management strategies and nitrogen sources compensated for nitrogen leaching throughout the cycle.

Abstract Image

沙质土壤中甘蔗对 15-N 肥料的浸出潜力和回收率
淋溶是限制甘蔗氮肥回收的一个重要损失途径。我们的研究评估了在沙质土壤中种植的甘蔗对 15N 肥料的浸出和回收潜力。我们测试了三种氮肥管理策略:单次施肥(80 千克/公顷-1)、分次施肥(40 千克/公顷-1 + 40 千克/公顷-1)和补充施肥(80 千克/公顷-1 + 40 千克/公顷-1)。使用的氮源为硝酸铵(AN)和硫酸铵(AS)。根据 0.7 米深土壤溶液中的氮矿物质浓度(NH4+、NO2- 和 NO3-)和 15N 肥料确定浸出情况。在施肥后的前 60 天(DAF),出现了明显的沥滤现象,但分次施肥使氮矿物沥滤减少了 50%。在此期间,浸出液中 78% 的氮来自肥料(NDFF(L))。在前 30 DAF 中,氮肥的作用最大,占甘蔗吸收氮量的 39%。但甘蔗的氮回收率(R)仅为施氮量的 4%。收获时,甘蔗对 15N 肥料的氮回收率不到 20%。分次施肥或单次施肥并不能提高周期结束时的氮素回收率。我们的研究表明,根据管理策略,15N 肥料的沥滤和回收与施用剂量成正比,氮源在整个周期内都能补偿氮的沥滤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sugar Tech
Sugar Tech AGRONOMY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
21.10%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The journal Sugar Tech is planned with every aim and objectives to provide a high-profile and updated research publications, comments and reviews on the most innovative, original and rigorous development in agriculture technologies for better crop improvement and production of sugar crops (sugarcane, sugar beet, sweet sorghum, Stevia, palm sugar, etc), sugar processing, bioethanol production, bioenergy, value addition and by-products. Inter-disciplinary studies of fundamental problems on the subjects are also given high priority. Thus, in addition to its full length and short papers on original research, the journal also covers regular feature articles, reviews, comments, scientific correspondence, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信