Cubicle design and dairy cow rising and lying down behaviours in free-stalls with insufficient lunge space

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
S.P. Brouwers , M. Simmler , M.F. Scriba , P. Savary
{"title":"Cubicle design and dairy cow rising and lying down behaviours in free-stalls with insufficient lunge space","authors":"S.P. Brouwers ,&nbsp;M. Simmler ,&nbsp;M.F. Scriba ,&nbsp;P. Savary","doi":"10.1016/j.animal.2024.101314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cubicle partitions divide the resting area of free-stalls into individual lying places for cows, thereby facilitating the maintenance of good hygiene and reducing competition by separating animals. The forward lunge space in lying cubicles is often insufficient for a natural head lunge movement during rising. Cubicles with open frame partitions and a flexible neck strap aim to alleviate this welfare issue. The open partition frame facilitates lateral space sharing (using space of neighbouring cubicles for the head lunge movement) and the flexible neck strap is presumably less painful upon collision. In an observational study, we investigated the lying behaviour of free-stall housed dairy cows in this ’permissive’ cubicle type with open frame partitions and a flexible neck strap positioned relatively high above the lying surface compared to ’restrictive’ cubicles with partitions with more bar work in the lateral lunge space and a lower-positioned rigid neck rail. The study was conducted on commercial Swiss dairy farms with exclusively wall-facing lying cubicles of either the permissive (four farms) or restrictive (six farms) type. The forward lunge space on these farms ranged from 55 to 70 cm, which we considered insufficient for adult cows to lunge their heads forward. On each farm, 18–20 lactating dairy cows were selected. In total, 188 animals were used in the statistical analysis. Over 1.5 days, rising and lying down movements were videotaped, and the prevalence of atypical behaviours during these movements was recorded. In addition, we determined the daily lying duration, the lying frequency, and the mean lying bout duration using accelerometers mounted on the left hind leg. The data was analysed in relation to the cubicle type (permissive or restrictive). In the permissive cubicle type, staggered head lunge movements during rising and displays of hesitance before lying down were less prevalent. The lying frequency was higher, and daily lying duration was longer in the permissive cubicle type, although these estimates should be interpreted with caution due to the short data collection period. The results of this study suggest that the permissive cubicle with open partitions and a high-positioned flexible neck strap may improve conditions for dairy cows to rise and lie down. A permissive cubicle design may therefore improve cow welfare in free-stalls with insufficient forward lunge space, where increasing lunge space is not feasible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50789,"journal":{"name":"Animal","volume":"18 10","pages":"Article 101314"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731124002519/pdfft?md5=17c4432d8a4af7c455c449e9975c646e&pid=1-s2.0-S1751731124002519-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731124002519","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cubicle partitions divide the resting area of free-stalls into individual lying places for cows, thereby facilitating the maintenance of good hygiene and reducing competition by separating animals. The forward lunge space in lying cubicles is often insufficient for a natural head lunge movement during rising. Cubicles with open frame partitions and a flexible neck strap aim to alleviate this welfare issue. The open partition frame facilitates lateral space sharing (using space of neighbouring cubicles for the head lunge movement) and the flexible neck strap is presumably less painful upon collision. In an observational study, we investigated the lying behaviour of free-stall housed dairy cows in this ’permissive’ cubicle type with open frame partitions and a flexible neck strap positioned relatively high above the lying surface compared to ’restrictive’ cubicles with partitions with more bar work in the lateral lunge space and a lower-positioned rigid neck rail. The study was conducted on commercial Swiss dairy farms with exclusively wall-facing lying cubicles of either the permissive (four farms) or restrictive (six farms) type. The forward lunge space on these farms ranged from 55 to 70 cm, which we considered insufficient for adult cows to lunge their heads forward. On each farm, 18–20 lactating dairy cows were selected. In total, 188 animals were used in the statistical analysis. Over 1.5 days, rising and lying down movements were videotaped, and the prevalence of atypical behaviours during these movements was recorded. In addition, we determined the daily lying duration, the lying frequency, and the mean lying bout duration using accelerometers mounted on the left hind leg. The data was analysed in relation to the cubicle type (permissive or restrictive). In the permissive cubicle type, staggered head lunge movements during rising and displays of hesitance before lying down were less prevalent. The lying frequency was higher, and daily lying duration was longer in the permissive cubicle type, although these estimates should be interpreted with caution due to the short data collection period. The results of this study suggest that the permissive cubicle with open partitions and a high-positioned flexible neck strap may improve conditions for dairy cows to rise and lie down. A permissive cubicle design may therefore improve cow welfare in free-stalls with insufficient forward lunge space, where increasing lunge space is not feasible.

挤奶空间不足的自由挤奶厅中的牛舍设计与奶牛起卧行为
牛栏隔板将自由牛栏的休息区分割成奶牛单独的卧位,从而有利于保持良好的卫生状况,并通过隔离动物减少竞争。卧栏的前倾空间往往不足以让奶牛在起立时自然地头部前倾。带有开放式框架隔板和灵活颈带的卧栏可缓解这一福利问题。开放式隔断框架有利于横向空间共享(利用相邻隔间的空间进行头部前倾运动),而柔性颈带可能会减少碰撞时的疼痛。在一项观察性研究中,我们调查了自由栏饲养奶牛在这种 "放任型 "隔间中的躺卧行为,这种隔间采用开放式框架隔断,柔性颈带位于躺卧面上方相对较高的位置,而 "限制型 "隔间则在横向奔跑空间中使用更多的栏杆和位置较低的刚性颈栏。这项研究是在瑞士的商业化奶牛场进行的,这些奶牛场的卧位隔间完全朝墙,分为 "允许型"(4 个牧场)和 "限制型"(6 个牧场)两种。这些牧场的前倾空间从 55 厘米到 70 厘米不等,我们认为这不足以让成年奶牛将头向前倾。每个牧场选择 18-20 头泌乳奶牛。共有 188 头奶牛被用于统计分析。我们对奶牛在 1.5 天内的起卧动作进行了录像,并记录了起卧过程中非典型行为的发生率。此外,我们还使用安装在左后腿上的加速度计测定了每天的卧地时间、卧地频率和平均卧地时间。我们根据隔间类型(允许型或限制型)对数据进行了分析。在宽松型隔间中,起立时交错的头部跳跃动作和躺下前犹豫不决的表现较少。在放任型隔间中,躺卧的频率更高,每天躺卧的时间更长,但由于数据收集时间较短,在解释这些估计值时应谨慎。本研究结果表明,带有开放式隔板和高位柔性颈带的开放式牛舍可改善奶牛起卧的条件。因此,在增加向前奔跑空间不可行的情况下,允许式牛舍设计可改善向前奔跑空间不足的自由式牛舍的奶牛福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal
Animal 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
246
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Editorial board animal attracts the best research in animal biology and animal systems from across the spectrum of the agricultural, biomedical, and environmental sciences. It is the central element in an exciting collaboration between the British Society of Animal Science (BSAS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) and the European Federation of Animal Science (EAAP) and represents a merging of three scientific journals: Animal Science; Animal Research; Reproduction, Nutrition, Development. animal publishes original cutting-edge research, ''hot'' topics and horizon-scanning reviews on animal-related aspects of the life sciences at the molecular, cellular, organ, whole animal and production system levels. The main subject areas include: breeding and genetics; nutrition; physiology and functional biology of systems; behaviour, health and welfare; farming systems, environmental impact and climate change; product quality, human health and well-being. Animal models and papers dealing with the integration of research between these topics and their impact on the environment and people are particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信