Use of Internal Bracing in Multi-ligamentous Knee Injury Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Abbie Randall, Richard Pearse, Shahnawaz Khan, Henry Atkinson
{"title":"Use of Internal Bracing in Multi-ligamentous Knee Injury Reconstruction: A Systematic Review","authors":"Abbie Randall, Richard Pearse, Shahnawaz Khan, Henry Atkinson","doi":"10.1007/s43465-024-01260-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Multi-ligament Knee Injuries (MLKI) are often caused by a high-energy impact resulting in dislocation of the knee joint. Given the higher degree of instability associated with these MLKIs, surgical fixation with adjunctive internal bracing and the use of suture augmentation have been proposed with the intention of better restoring knee stability and improving the long-term outcomes of surgery. This systematic review seeks to appraise the current literature in relation to the role of internal bracing in the management of MLKI.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>All randomised control trials, observational studies, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies containing patients with multi-ligamentous knee injuries managed with the use of internal bracing or suture tape augmentation were included in this review. The primary outcomes of interest were re-operation and failure rates, with secondary outcomes focussed on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and examination findings of knee stability.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>282 studies were identified for screening, 13 of which were suitable for inclusion and five of these had injuries with Schenck grade III or above. Of the studies identified, failure rates ranged from 0 to 13.6%. Lysholm score was the most commonly utilised PROM tool with scores ranging from 61.8 to 95. Stiffness requiring MUA ± adhesiolysis was a common complication identified across studies.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The use of internal bracing in Multi-ligament Knee Injuries appears to be as effective as not using an internal bracing technique. The post-operative PROMs and relatively low failure rates reflect promising outcomes for the ongoing use of internal bracing in MLKI. However, further prospective studies directly comparing braced versus non-braced ligamentous repairs are required in order to definitively determine if the use of the internal brace does allow for increased joint stability and early rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01260-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Multi-ligament Knee Injuries (MLKI) are often caused by a high-energy impact resulting in dislocation of the knee joint. Given the higher degree of instability associated with these MLKIs, surgical fixation with adjunctive internal bracing and the use of suture augmentation have been proposed with the intention of better restoring knee stability and improving the long-term outcomes of surgery. This systematic review seeks to appraise the current literature in relation to the role of internal bracing in the management of MLKI.

Methods

All randomised control trials, observational studies, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies containing patients with multi-ligamentous knee injuries managed with the use of internal bracing or suture tape augmentation were included in this review. The primary outcomes of interest were re-operation and failure rates, with secondary outcomes focussed on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and examination findings of knee stability.

Results

282 studies were identified for screening, 13 of which were suitable for inclusion and five of these had injuries with Schenck grade III or above. Of the studies identified, failure rates ranged from 0 to 13.6%. Lysholm score was the most commonly utilised PROM tool with scores ranging from 61.8 to 95. Stiffness requiring MUA ± adhesiolysis was a common complication identified across studies.

Conclusions

The use of internal bracing in Multi-ligament Knee Injuries appears to be as effective as not using an internal bracing technique. The post-operative PROMs and relatively low failure rates reflect promising outcomes for the ongoing use of internal bracing in MLKI. However, further prospective studies directly comparing braced versus non-braced ligamentous repairs are required in order to definitively determine if the use of the internal brace does allow for increased joint stability and early rehabilitation.

Abstract Image

在多韧带膝关节损伤重建中使用内支撑:系统回顾
背景膝关节多韧带损伤(MLKI)通常是由高能量撞击导致膝关节脱位引起的。鉴于这些膝关节多韧带损伤具有较高的不稳定性,人们提出了手术固定并辅以内支撑和缝合增量的方法,以期更好地恢复膝关节的稳定性并改善手术的长期疗效。本系统性综述旨在评估目前与内支架在多韧带膝关节损伤治疗中的作用相关的文献。方法本综述纳入了所有随机对照试验、观察性研究、队列研究和横断面研究,这些研究都包含了使用内支架或缝合带增量术治疗的多韧带膝关节损伤患者。研究的主要结果是再次手术率和失败率,次要结果是患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)和膝关节稳定性的检查结果。结果 筛选出282项研究,其中13项适合纳入,其中5项的损伤程度为申克III级或以上。在确定的研究中,失败率从 0% 到 13.6% 不等。Lysholm 评分是最常用的 PROM 工具,评分范围从 61.8 到 95 分不等。结论在多韧带膝关节损伤中使用内固定似乎与不使用内固定技术一样有效。术后PROMs和相对较低的失败率反映出在多韧带膝关节损伤中持续使用内支撑技术具有良好的效果。不过,还需要进一步的前瞻性研究,直接比较有支撑与无支撑的韧带修复,以明确确定使用内支撑是否能增加关节稳定性和早期康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信