Local Public Health Strategies for Addressing Social Determinants of Health-Analysis of Recent Community Health Improvement Plans.

Karl Johnson,Nidhi Oruganti,Dorothy Cilenti,John Wiesman,Todd Jensen,Kristen Hassmiller
{"title":"Local Public Health Strategies for Addressing Social Determinants of Health-Analysis of Recent Community Health Improvement Plans.","authors":"Karl Johnson,Nidhi Oruganti,Dorothy Cilenti,John Wiesman,Todd Jensen,Kristen Hassmiller","doi":"10.1097/phh.0000000000001938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\r\nThe Public Health 3.0 (PH3.0) framework encourages local health departments (LHDs) to address the social determinants of health (SDOHs) that impact health equity.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nThis study sought to understand how often LHDs are working to address SDOH, which SDOHs are most often being addressed, as well as the mix of strategies that have been proposed to address this work.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nWe reviewed recent Community Health Improvement Plans (CHIPs) to analyze the current involvement of LHDs in addressing SDOH.\r\n\r\nSETTING\r\nCHIPs published from 2020.\r\n\r\nPARTICIPANTS\r\nAccredited LHDs from across the United States (n = 80).\r\n\r\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURES\r\nWe developed a qualitative guidebook to characterize CHIP strategies based on the SDOH domain they addressed and the strategic mechanism they proposed.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAcross our entire sample, CHIPs were roughly 1.5 times more likely to address Health Care Access than Food Insecurity and Access to Healthy Food (65%), Neighborhood Infrastructure (61%), or Affordable Housing (65%), and they were 3 to 4 times more likely to address Health Care Access than Safe Housing (23%), Education Access and Quality (31%), or Economic Stability (24%). Across all major domains, a few concerned policy changes and a handful focused on improving systems or developing the built environment. Most strategies focused on service provision through events or the education of the public and professionals on health-related topics.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe results of this study demonstrate that not all SDOHs are addressed equally by LHDs within their CHIPs. There is significant variation in how SDOHs are addressed along at 2 dimensions: first, in the likelihood that a CHIP addresses the domain and, second, in the mechanism by which each domain is addressed. Practically, the list of strategies we documented from the 80 CHIPs included in our sample may serve as the basis for strategies that other communities may wish to consider when addressing SDOH.","PeriodicalId":520109,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management & Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/phh.0000000000001938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT The Public Health 3.0 (PH3.0) framework encourages local health departments (LHDs) to address the social determinants of health (SDOHs) that impact health equity. OBJECTIVE This study sought to understand how often LHDs are working to address SDOH, which SDOHs are most often being addressed, as well as the mix of strategies that have been proposed to address this work. DESIGN We reviewed recent Community Health Improvement Plans (CHIPs) to analyze the current involvement of LHDs in addressing SDOH. SETTING CHIPs published from 2020. PARTICIPANTS Accredited LHDs from across the United States (n = 80). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We developed a qualitative guidebook to characterize CHIP strategies based on the SDOH domain they addressed and the strategic mechanism they proposed. RESULTS Across our entire sample, CHIPs were roughly 1.5 times more likely to address Health Care Access than Food Insecurity and Access to Healthy Food (65%), Neighborhood Infrastructure (61%), or Affordable Housing (65%), and they were 3 to 4 times more likely to address Health Care Access than Safe Housing (23%), Education Access and Quality (31%), or Economic Stability (24%). Across all major domains, a few concerned policy changes and a handful focused on improving systems or developing the built environment. Most strategies focused on service provision through events or the education of the public and professionals on health-related topics. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study demonstrate that not all SDOHs are addressed equally by LHDs within their CHIPs. There is significant variation in how SDOHs are addressed along at 2 dimensions: first, in the likelihood that a CHIP addresses the domain and, second, in the mechanism by which each domain is addressed. Practically, the list of strategies we documented from the 80 CHIPs included in our sample may serve as the basis for strategies that other communities may wish to consider when addressing SDOH.
应对健康的社会决定因素的地方公共卫生战略--近期社区健康改善计划分析》(Local Public Health Strategies for Addressing Social Determinants of Health-Analysis of Recent Community Health Improvement Plans)。
背景公共卫生 3.0(PH3.0)框架鼓励地方卫生部门(LHDs)解决影响健康公平的健康社会决定因素(SDOHs)。目的本研究旨在了解地方卫生部门解决 SDOHs 问题的频率、最常解决的 SDOHs 问题以及为解决这一问题而提出的策略组合。设计我们回顾了最近的社区健康改善计划(CHIP),以分析目前地方卫生机构参与解决SDOH问题的情况。主要结果测量我们制定了一份定性指导手册,根据CHIP战略所涉及的SDOH领域及其提出的战略机制对CHIP战略进行定性。在我们的整个样本中,解决医疗保健问题的可能性是解决食品不安全和健康食品问题(65%)、解决邻里基础设施问题(61%)或解决经济适用房问题(65%)的 1.5 倍,解决医疗保健问题的可能性是解决安全住房问题(23%)、解决教育机会和教育质量问题(31%)或解决经济稳定性问题(24%)的 3 到 4 倍。在所有主要领域中,少数涉及政策变革,少数侧重于改善系统或发展建筑环境。大多数策略侧重于通过活动提供服务,或对公众和专业人员进行健康相关主题的教育。在如何解决 SDOHs 问题上,有两个方面存在显著差异:第一,CHIP 解决该领域问题的可能性;第二,解决每个领域问题的机制。实际上,我们从样本中的 80 个 CHIP 中记录的策略清单可以作为其他社区在解决 SDOH 问题时可能希望考虑的策略的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信