Knowledge mobilization with and for equity-deserving communities invested in research: A scoping review protocol

Ramy Barhouche, Samson Tse, Fiona Inglis, Debbie Chaves, Erin Allison, Tina Colaco, Melody E. Morton Ninomiya
{"title":"Knowledge mobilization with and for equity-deserving communities invested in research: A scoping review protocol","authors":"Ramy Barhouche, Samson Tse, Fiona Inglis, Debbie Chaves, Erin Allison, Tina Colaco, Melody E. Morton Ninomiya","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.06.24313221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The practice of putting research into action is known by various names, depending on disciplinary norms. Knowledge mobilization, translation, and transfer (collectively referred to as K*) are three common terminologies used in research literature. Knowledge-to-action opportunities and gaps in academic research often remain obscure to non-academic researchers in communities, policy and decision makers, and practitioners who could benefit from up-to-date information on health and wellbeing. Academic research training, funding, and performance metrics rarely prioritize or address non-academic community needs from research. We propose to conduct a scoping review on reported K* in community-driven research contexts, examining the governance, processes, methods, and benefits of K*, and mapping who, what, where, and when K* terminology is used. This protocol paper outlines our approach to gathering, screening, analyzing, and reporting on available published literature from four databases.","PeriodicalId":501454,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Informatics","volume":"410 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.06.24313221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The practice of putting research into action is known by various names, depending on disciplinary norms. Knowledge mobilization, translation, and transfer (collectively referred to as K*) are three common terminologies used in research literature. Knowledge-to-action opportunities and gaps in academic research often remain obscure to non-academic researchers in communities, policy and decision makers, and practitioners who could benefit from up-to-date information on health and wellbeing. Academic research training, funding, and performance metrics rarely prioritize or address non-academic community needs from research. We propose to conduct a scoping review on reported K* in community-driven research contexts, examining the governance, processes, methods, and benefits of K*, and mapping who, what, where, and when K* terminology is used. This protocol paper outlines our approach to gathering, screening, analyzing, and reporting on available published literature from four databases.
与研究领域中需要公平的群体一起并为他们进行知识动员:范围界定审查协议
根据学科规范的不同,将研究付诸行动的做法有各种名称。知识动员、转化和转移(统称为 K*)是研究文献中常用的三个术语。对于社区中的非学术研究人员、政策和决策者以及从业人员而言,学术研究中知识转化为行动的机会和差距往往仍然模糊不清,而这些人可以从有关健康和福祉的最新信息中受益。学术研究培训、资金和绩效衡量标准很少优先考虑或解决非学术社区的研究需求。我们建议对社区驱动研究中报告的 K* 进行一次范围界定审查,检查 K* 的管理、流程、方法和益处,并绘制 K* 术语的使用对象、内容、地点和时间图。本协议文件概述了我们从四个数据库中收集、筛选、分析和报告已发表文献的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信