Comparing Real and Imitative Practice with No Practice during Observational Learning of Hand Motor Skills from Animations

IF 2.5 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Maliha Naushad Mian, Hannah Beder, Nadine Marcus, Paul Ayres
{"title":"Comparing Real and Imitative Practice with No Practice during Observational Learning of Hand Motor Skills from Animations","authors":"Maliha Naushad Mian, Hannah Beder, Nadine Marcus, Paul Ayres","doi":"10.3390/educsci14090949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In two experiments, we compared the effects of practice (real and imitative) with no practice on the observational learning of hand motor skills from animated videos. Experiment 1 investigated learning to play a series of piano clips of varying complexity. Results demonstrated improved learning efficiency with imitative practice compared to no practice. Experiment 2 featured a paper-folding task, and results indicated that real practice led to significantly greater learning than no practice. Furthermore, a significant interaction was found with gender and practice, where females learned best with both real and imitative practice, but males did not benefit from these interventions. However, males outperformed females in the no practice condition. Overall, we found benefits of practice versus no practice for both tasks. However, the most effective type of practice was dependent upon the task: imitative practice for piano playing, and real practice for paper folding. Task complexity and gender were also found to be moderating factors.","PeriodicalId":11472,"journal":{"name":"Education Sciences","volume":"407 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In two experiments, we compared the effects of practice (real and imitative) with no practice on the observational learning of hand motor skills from animated videos. Experiment 1 investigated learning to play a series of piano clips of varying complexity. Results demonstrated improved learning efficiency with imitative practice compared to no practice. Experiment 2 featured a paper-folding task, and results indicated that real practice led to significantly greater learning than no practice. Furthermore, a significant interaction was found with gender and practice, where females learned best with both real and imitative practice, but males did not benefit from these interventions. However, males outperformed females in the no practice condition. Overall, we found benefits of practice versus no practice for both tasks. However, the most effective type of practice was dependent upon the task: imitative practice for piano playing, and real practice for paper folding. Task complexity and gender were also found to be moderating factors.
在通过动画观察学习手部运动技能的过程中,比较真实练习、模仿练习和不练习的效果
在两个实验中,我们比较了练习(真实练习和模仿练习)和不练习对从动画视频中观察学习手部运动技能的影响。实验 1 调查了学习弹奏一系列复杂程度不同的钢琴片段的情况。结果表明,与不练习相比,模仿练习提高了学习效率。实验 2 以折纸任务为特色,结果表明,与不练习相比,真正的练习能显著提高学习效率。此外,实验还发现性别与练习之间存在明显的交互作用,女性在真实练习和模仿练习中的学习效果最好,而男性则无法从这些干预措施中获益。不过,在不练习的情况下,男性的表现要优于女性。总的来说,我们发现在两项任务中,练习和不练习都有好处。然而,最有效的练习类型取决于任务:钢琴演奏为模仿练习,折纸为真实练习。我们还发现,任务的复杂性和性别也是调节因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education Sciences
Education Sciences Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
770
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信