What is Known About Development-Oriented Performance Management Practices? A Scoping Review

IF 4.6 3区管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT

Human Resource Development Review Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1177/15344843241278405

Dimitris Giamos, Olivier Doucet, Marie-Ève Lapalme

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although a growing number of organizations now focus on the developmental aspect of their performance management practices to improve their effectiveness, little research has been conducted so far on these practices and their outcomes. To deepen our understanding of this phenomenon, we undertook a scoping review on development-oriented performance management practices (DOPMPs) within the employee development and performance management literatures. After mapping the literature on these topics, synthesizing their outcomes, and factors for implementation, we identified research gaps and proposed research avenues. Our review suggests that most of the literature on DOPMPs comes from the grey literature, that most practices are used for performance execution, but more attention needs to be given to strategic planning. By structuring the current knowledge on this topic, this review encourages researchers to produce new knowledge about DOPMPs, their synergies, and their outcomes through a systems approach.

查看原文本刊更多论文

以发展为导向的绩效管理实践知多少？范围审查

尽管现在越来越多的组织注重绩效管理实践中的发展方面，以提高其有效性，但迄今为止，有关这些实践及其结果的研究却少之又少。为了加深对这一现象的理解，我们对员工发展和绩效管理文献中以发展为导向的绩效管理实践（DOPMPs）进行了范围界定。在对这些主题的文献进行梳理、综合其成果和实施因素之后，我们确定了研究空白并提出了研究途径。我们的综述表明，有关 DOPMPs 的文献大多来自灰色文献，大多数做法都用于绩效执行，但需要更加关注战略规划。本综述通过对该主题现有知识的梳理，鼓励研究人员通过系统方法，对 DOPMPs、其协同作用及其成果产生新的认识。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Human Resource Development Review MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

9.60

自引率

17.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： As described elsewhere, Human Resource Development Review is a theory development journal for scholars of human resource development and related disciplines. Human Resource Development Review publishes articles that make theoretical contributions on theory development, foundations of HRD, theory building methods, and integrative reviews of the relevant literature. Papers whose central focus is empirical findings, including empirical method and design are not considered for publication in Human Resource Development Review. This journal encourages submissions that provide new theoretical insights to advance our understanding of human resource development and related disciplines. Such papers may include syntheses of existing bodies of theory, new substantive theories, exploratory conceptual models, taxonomies and typology developed as foundations for theory, treatises in formal theory construction, papers on the history of theory, critique of theory that includes alternative research propositions, metatheory, and integrative literature reviews with strong theoretical implications. Papers addressing foundations of HRD might address philosophies of HRD, historical foundations, definitions of the field, conceptual organization of the field, and ethical foundations. Human Resource Development Review takes a multi-paradigm view of theory building so submissions from different paradigms are encouraged.