Identification of environmental impacts associated with municipal solid waste management through life cycle assessment

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
D. A. Colvero, S. C. Pfeiffer, J. C. M. Ramalho, A. A. do Nascimento, A. C. A. de Lima
{"title":"Identification of environmental impacts associated with municipal solid waste management through life cycle assessment","authors":"D. A. Colvero, S. C. Pfeiffer, J. C. M. Ramalho, A. A. do Nascimento, A. C. A. de Lima","doi":"10.1007/s13762-024-06003-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Even though when the COVID-19 pandemic started, in 2020, the urban cleaning and solid waste management services were not disrupted in Goiânia, Brazil, they were directly affected by social distancing measures. Therefore, the goal of this study was to determine the environmental impacts of municipal solid waste management in the municipality of Goiânia, through life cycle assessment. For this purpose, quantitative data was requested to <i>Companhia de Urbanização de Goiânia</i> regarding waste collection (commingled and source-separated) and final disposal in the unlicensed landfill of Goiânia, between 2016 and 2020. To quantify the environmental impacts, six different scenarios were assessed with EASETECH, a specific life cycle assessment tool for waste, using 12 impact categories. Comparing the data of 2020 with 2019, commingled collection increased 2.2%, while source-separated collection decreased 7.6% than in 2019, mainly due to the changes in eating habits and lifestyle imposed by the pandemic. Concerning environmental impacts, the results indicated that scenario 2, which has the lowest of potentially recyclable waste diversions and relies on an unlicensed landfill, has presented the worst environmental result. Conversely, only by replacing the unlicensed landfill with a licensed one, reduces the environmental impacts between 68.5% and 75%. And when the amount of recycling was gradually increased in Scenario 6, the reduction in environmental impacts exceeded 84%.</p>","PeriodicalId":589,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-06003-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Even though when the COVID-19 pandemic started, in 2020, the urban cleaning and solid waste management services were not disrupted in Goiânia, Brazil, they were directly affected by social distancing measures. Therefore, the goal of this study was to determine the environmental impacts of municipal solid waste management in the municipality of Goiânia, through life cycle assessment. For this purpose, quantitative data was requested to Companhia de Urbanização de Goiânia regarding waste collection (commingled and source-separated) and final disposal in the unlicensed landfill of Goiânia, between 2016 and 2020. To quantify the environmental impacts, six different scenarios were assessed with EASETECH, a specific life cycle assessment tool for waste, using 12 impact categories. Comparing the data of 2020 with 2019, commingled collection increased 2.2%, while source-separated collection decreased 7.6% than in 2019, mainly due to the changes in eating habits and lifestyle imposed by the pandemic. Concerning environmental impacts, the results indicated that scenario 2, which has the lowest of potentially recyclable waste diversions and relies on an unlicensed landfill, has presented the worst environmental result. Conversely, only by replacing the unlicensed landfill with a licensed one, reduces the environmental impacts between 68.5% and 75%. And when the amount of recycling was gradually increased in Scenario 6, the reduction in environmental impacts exceeded 84%.

Abstract Image

通过生命周期评估确定与城市固体废物管理相关的环境影响
尽管 2020 年 COVID-19 大流行开始时,巴西戈亚尼亚市的城市清洁和固体废物管理服务并未中断,但它们受到了社会疏远措施的直接影响。因此,本研究的目标是通过生命周期评估确定戈亚尼亚市城市固体废物管理对环境的影响。为此,我们要求戈亚尼亚城市化公司提供有关 2016 年至 2020 年垃圾收集(混合和源头分类)和最终在戈亚尼亚无证垃圾填埋场处置的定量数据。为了量化对环境的影响,我们使用专门的废物生命周期评估工具 EASETECH 评估了六种不同的情况,共涉及 12 个影响类别。与 2019 年的数据相比,2020 年的混合收集量增加了 2.2%,而源分类收集量比 2019 年减少了 7.6%,这主要是由于大流行病导致饮食习惯和生活方式发生了变化。关于对环境的影响,研究结果表明,方案 2 的潜在可回收垃圾分流量最低,并且依赖于无证垃圾填埋场,其环境结果最差。相反,只有用有许可证的垃圾填埋场取代无许可证的垃圾填埋场,才能减少 68.5% 到 75% 的环境影响。而在方案 6 中,当回收量逐渐增加时,环境影响的减少超过了 84%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
806
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (IJEST) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of environmental science and technology, innovation, engineering and management. A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: peer reviewed original research articles, case and technical reports, reviews and analyses papers, short communications and notes to the editor, in interdisciplinary information on the practice and status of research in environmental science and technology, both natural and man made. The main aspects of research areas include, but are not exclusive to; environmental chemistry and biology, environments pollution control and abatement technology, transport and fate of pollutants in the environment, concentrations and dispersion of wastes in air, water, and soil, point and non-point sources pollution, heavy metals and organic compounds in the environment, atmospheric pollutants and trace gases, solid and hazardous waste management; soil biodegradation and bioremediation of contaminated sites; environmental impact assessment, industrial ecology, ecological and human risk assessment; improved energy management and auditing efficiency and environmental standards and criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信