Understanding the Role of Recreational Angling Technology in Angler Expectations of Catch, Trip Catch, and Angler Satisfaction

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Fisheries Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1002/fsh.11157
Amanda M. Kerkhove, Ashley Trudeau, Olaf P. Jensen, Daniel A. Isermann, Patricia A. Dombrowski, Alexandra M. Latimer, Zachary S. Feiner
{"title":"Understanding the Role of Recreational Angling Technology in Angler Expectations of Catch, Trip Catch, and Angler Satisfaction","authors":"Amanda M. Kerkhove,&nbsp;Ashley Trudeau,&nbsp;Olaf P. Jensen,&nbsp;Daniel A. Isermann,&nbsp;Patricia A. Dombrowski,&nbsp;Alexandra M. Latimer,&nbsp;Zachary S. Feiner","doi":"10.1002/fsh.11157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rapid technological advancement often receives a mix of criticism and welcome implementation. Fishing technologies, such as sonar, are believed to enable anglers to be more efficient and effective in their angling. There are concerns from anglers and managers of increased catch by technology users. We assessed the relationships between technology use—defined as the use of imaging technology such as sonar and underwater cameras—and catch, angler expectations of catch, and trip satisfaction using a dual intercept creel survey. Angling technologies were used by 80% and 79% of intercepted boat and ice anglers, respectively, but only 3.9% of shore anglers. Fishing technologies increased expected catch for game fish anglers, but not panfish anglers, and had no effect on actual catch for either group. Most anglers caught fewer fish than expected, and technology did not improve their ability to meet expectations. Technology use was associated with decreased overall satisfaction among panfish and game fish anglers. These results suggest that concerns about fishing technology increasing catch may not be warranted. Rather, technology use may affect angler expectations and negatively impact angler satisfaction, potentially influencing angler behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":12389,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries","volume":"49 10","pages":"463-474"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fsh.11157","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fsh.11157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid technological advancement often receives a mix of criticism and welcome implementation. Fishing technologies, such as sonar, are believed to enable anglers to be more efficient and effective in their angling. There are concerns from anglers and managers of increased catch by technology users. We assessed the relationships between technology use—defined as the use of imaging technology such as sonar and underwater cameras—and catch, angler expectations of catch, and trip satisfaction using a dual intercept creel survey. Angling technologies were used by 80% and 79% of intercepted boat and ice anglers, respectively, but only 3.9% of shore anglers. Fishing technologies increased expected catch for game fish anglers, but not panfish anglers, and had no effect on actual catch for either group. Most anglers caught fewer fish than expected, and technology did not improve their ability to meet expectations. Technology use was associated with decreased overall satisfaction among panfish and game fish anglers. These results suggest that concerns about fishing technology increasing catch may not be warranted. Rather, technology use may affect angler expectations and negatively impact angler satisfaction, potentially influencing angler behavior.

Abstract Image

了解休闲垂钓技术在垂钓者对渔获量、行程渔获量和垂钓者满意度的预期中的作用
技术的飞速发展往往既受到批评,又受到欢迎。人们认为,声纳等捕鱼技术能让垂钓者提高垂钓效率和效果。垂钓者和管理者也担心技术使用者会增加渔获量。我们通过双拦截鱼钩调查评估了技术使用(定义为声纳和水下摄像机等成像技术的使用)与渔获量、垂钓者对渔获量的期望以及行程满意度之间的关系。分别有 80% 和 79% 的拦截船和冰上垂钓者使用了垂钓技术,但只有 3.9% 的岸上垂钓者使用了垂钓技术。垂钓技术提高了野味鱼垂钓者的预期渔获量,但没有提高盘鱼垂钓者的预期渔获量,对这两类垂钓者的实际渔获量没有影响。大多数垂钓者的渔获量低于预期,而技术并没有提高他们达到预期的能力。技术的使用与鲈鱼和野味垂钓者总体满意度的下降有关。这些结果表明,对钓鱼技术会增加渔获量的担忧可能是没有道理的。相反,技术的使用可能会影响垂钓者的预期,并对垂钓者的满意度产生负面影响,从而可能影响垂钓者的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fisheries
Fisheries 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Fisheries is a monthly magazine established in January 1976, by the American Fisheries Society (AFS), the oldest and largest professional society representing fisheries scientists. Fisheries features peer-reviewed technical articles on all aspects of aquatic resource-related subjects, as well as professional issues, new ideas and approaches, education, economics, administration, and law. Issues contain features, essays, AFS news, current events, book reviews, editorials, letters, job notices, chapter activies, and a calendar of events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信