From Self-Management to Shared-Management: A Relational Approach for Equitable Chronic Care

IF 1.4 3区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Francisca Stutzin Donoso
{"title":"From Self-Management to Shared-Management: A Relational Approach for Equitable Chronic Care","authors":"Francisca Stutzin Donoso","doi":"10.1093/phe/phae007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Life with chronic disease and chronic care is hard and people who live in disadvantage may lack the freedom to prioritise their care because of increased competing demands. This paper proposes that shifting the goals of chronic care from self-management support to a shared-management approach can help improve wellbeing and health outcomes across social groups. This work draws on a qualitative exploration of the lived experience of chronic disease and an applied ethical analysis of the reproduction of disadvantages within chronic care. The qualitative results further specify respectful and collaborative patient-healthcare professional relationships; autonomy-supportive interventions; and continuity of care to face the complexity of chronicity in a phenomenological sense—a paradoxical experience of long duration that comprises the disease’s presence in the absence of its manifestation. The ethical analysis draws on performativity; autonomy and decision-making; and responsibility, which constitute the theoretical foundation for shared-management. This approach contributes to advance current normative thinking for health justice and outlines practical steps for its clinical implementation in the delivery of chronic care.","PeriodicalId":49136,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Ethics","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phae007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Life with chronic disease and chronic care is hard and people who live in disadvantage may lack the freedom to prioritise their care because of increased competing demands. This paper proposes that shifting the goals of chronic care from self-management support to a shared-management approach can help improve wellbeing and health outcomes across social groups. This work draws on a qualitative exploration of the lived experience of chronic disease and an applied ethical analysis of the reproduction of disadvantages within chronic care. The qualitative results further specify respectful and collaborative patient-healthcare professional relationships; autonomy-supportive interventions; and continuity of care to face the complexity of chronicity in a phenomenological sense—a paradoxical experience of long duration that comprises the disease’s presence in the absence of its manifestation. The ethical analysis draws on performativity; autonomy and decision-making; and responsibility, which constitute the theoretical foundation for shared-management. This approach contributes to advance current normative thinking for health justice and outlines practical steps for its clinical implementation in the delivery of chronic care.
从自我管理到共享管理:公平慢性病护理的关系方法
患有慢性疾病和长期护理的人生活艰辛,而生活在弱势群体中的人可能会因为更多相互竞争的需求而无法自由地优先考虑他们的护理。本文提出,将慢性病护理的目标从自我管理支持转向共同管理方法,有助于改善不同社会群体的福祉和健康状况。这项工作借鉴了对慢性病生活体验的定性探索,以及对慢性病护理中的不利因素再现进行的应用伦理分析。定性结果进一步明确了患者与医疗保健专业人员之间相互尊重、相互协作的关系;支持自主性的干预措施;以及从现象学意义上面对慢性病复杂性的连续性护理--一种由疾病存在而疾病不存在的长期矛盾体验。伦理分析借鉴了表演性、自主和决策以及责任,这些构成了共同管理的理论基础。这种方法有助于推进当前的健康正义规范思想,并概述了在提供慢性病护理的临床实施中的实际步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Ethics
Public Health Ethics PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-MEDICAL ETHICS
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Ethics invites submission of papers on any topic that is relevant for ethical reflection about public health practice and theory. Our aim is to publish readable papers of high scientific quality which will stimulate debate and discussion about ethical issues relating to all aspects of public health. Our main criteria for grading manuscripts include originality and potential impact, quality of philosophical analysis, and relevance to debates in public health ethics and practice. Manuscripts are accepted for publication on the understanding that they have been submitted solely to Public Health Ethics and that they have not been previously published either in whole or in part. Authors may not submit papers that are under consideration for publication elsewhere, and, if an author decides to offer a submitted paper to another journal, the paper must be withdrawn from Public Health Ethics before the new submission is made. The editorial office will make every effort to deal with submissions to the journal as quickly as possible. All papers will be acknowledged on receipt by email and will receive preliminary editorial review within 2 weeks. Papers of high interest will be sent out for external review. Authors will normally be notified of acceptance, rejection, or need for revision within 8 weeks of submission. Contributors will be provided with electronic access to their proof via email; corrections should be returned within 48 hours.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信