Reproducing poverty through participation: examining the constraints of community development strategies in fostering empowerment and social change

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Shahzad Khan, Robyn Eversole
{"title":"Reproducing poverty through participation: examining the constraints of community development strategies in fostering empowerment and social change","authors":"Shahzad Khan, Robyn Eversole","doi":"10.1093/cdj/bsae045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Community participation is often heralded as a remedy to the disadvantages faced by marginalized people, with the assumption that it catalyses empowerment and social change. However, in development practice, this view may overlook the intricate power dynamics that reinforce marginalization and how they interplay within local communities and with external developers. This paper seeks to examine how power relations in and beyond the local level influence participatory community development initiatives and their potential to challenge or reinforce disadvantage. It focuses on the Rural Support Programmes Network’s much-touted ‘three-tier social mobilization strategy’ in Northwest Pakistan as a qualitative case study, using participant and non-participant observation, document analysis and semi-structured interviews. Findings indicate that active participation by local people in community development processes does not always catalyse empowerment and social change. Without a deliberate reconfiguration of traditional exclusionary power relations, participation in community initiatives may simply perpetuate social exclusion for disadvantaged groups. Existing social structures allow traditionally powerful people to use participatory processes to reproduce and or/further reinforce their power and control via ‘strategic compliance’. The study concludes that community development programmes require a nuanced understanding of power dynamics and a deliberate effort to reconfigure those dynamics to foster meaningful engagement and empowerment of disadvantaged groups.","PeriodicalId":47329,"journal":{"name":"Community Development Journal","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsae045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community participation is often heralded as a remedy to the disadvantages faced by marginalized people, with the assumption that it catalyses empowerment and social change. However, in development practice, this view may overlook the intricate power dynamics that reinforce marginalization and how they interplay within local communities and with external developers. This paper seeks to examine how power relations in and beyond the local level influence participatory community development initiatives and their potential to challenge or reinforce disadvantage. It focuses on the Rural Support Programmes Network’s much-touted ‘three-tier social mobilization strategy’ in Northwest Pakistan as a qualitative case study, using participant and non-participant observation, document analysis and semi-structured interviews. Findings indicate that active participation by local people in community development processes does not always catalyse empowerment and social change. Without a deliberate reconfiguration of traditional exclusionary power relations, participation in community initiatives may simply perpetuate social exclusion for disadvantaged groups. Existing social structures allow traditionally powerful people to use participatory processes to reproduce and or/further reinforce their power and control via ‘strategic compliance’. The study concludes that community development programmes require a nuanced understanding of power dynamics and a deliberate effort to reconfigure those dynamics to foster meaningful engagement and empowerment of disadvantaged groups.
通过参与再现贫困:研究社区发展战略在促进赋权和社会变革方面的制约因素
社区参与常常被视为解决边缘化人群所面临的不利处境的良方,并被假定为能促进赋权和社会变革。然而,在发展实践中,这种观点可能会忽略加剧边缘化的错综复杂的权力动态,以及它们如何在当地社区内部以及与外部开发者相互作用。本文试图研究地方内外的权力关系如何影响参与式社区发展计划及其挑战或强化弱势地位的潜力。本文以巴基斯坦西北部农村支持计划网络备受推崇的 "三级社会动员战略 "作为定性案例研究的重点,采用了参与式和非参与式观察、文件分析和半结构式访谈等方法。研究结果表明,当地人积极参与社区发展进程并不总能促进赋权和社会变革。如果不对传统的排斥性权力关系进行深思熟虑的重新配置,参与社区活动可能只会使弱势群体长期受到社会排斥。现有的社会结构允许传统上有权势的人利用参与过程,通过 "战略服从 "来复制和/或进一步加强他们的权力和控制。研究得出结论,社区发展计划需要对权力动态有细致入微的了解,并有意识地努力重新配置这些动态,以促进弱势群体有意义的参与和赋权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Community Development Journal
Community Development Journal DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Since 1966 the leading international journal in its field, covering a wide range of topics, reviewing significant developments and providing a forum for cutting-edge debates about theory and practice. It adopts a broad definition of community development to include policy, planning and action as they impact on the life of communities. We particularly seek to publish critically focused articles which challenge received wisdom, report and discuss innovative practices, and relate issues of community development to questions of social justice, diversity and environmental sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信