Effect of Policy Mix on Urban Road Network Capacity Assessment Considering Shared Mobility

Ziyan Ju, Muqing Du
{"title":"Effect of Policy Mix on Urban Road Network Capacity Assessment Considering Shared Mobility","authors":"Ziyan Ju, Muqing Du","doi":"10.1177/03611981241262298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of the trend for green travel, the emergence of shared mobility, represented by e-hailing and ridesharing, provides behavioral richness for travelers. Consequently, the authorities that devote themselves to balancing supply and demand in multimodal networks are concerned with incorporating shared mobility into transportation planning and formulating reasonable policy measures. A novel capacity model incorporating a policy mix is developed here as a bi-level programming problem in which the lower-level model is a combined modal split and traffic assignment considering elastic demand (CMSTA-ED) problem, while the upper-level model maximizes the origin–destination (OD) demand multiplier. Integrating the capacity model (the effectiveness index) with social welfare (the implementability index) can account for the synergy, facilitation, and potential contradiction of policy mixes. Numerical experiments validate the characteristics of shared mobility as a supplement to poorly performing public transit under its poor performance. It also examines the policy mix between a public-transit priority subsidy, parking charging, and the shared-mobility subsidy to discover the positive coordination that any individual policy cannot satisfy. This study provides implementable insights for further formulating rational policy-mix strategies on shared mobility to promote the sustainable usage of shared mobility.","PeriodicalId":517391,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241262298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of the trend for green travel, the emergence of shared mobility, represented by e-hailing and ridesharing, provides behavioral richness for travelers. Consequently, the authorities that devote themselves to balancing supply and demand in multimodal networks are concerned with incorporating shared mobility into transportation planning and formulating reasonable policy measures. A novel capacity model incorporating a policy mix is developed here as a bi-level programming problem in which the lower-level model is a combined modal split and traffic assignment considering elastic demand (CMSTA-ED) problem, while the upper-level model maximizes the origin–destination (OD) demand multiplier. Integrating the capacity model (the effectiveness index) with social welfare (the implementability index) can account for the synergy, facilitation, and potential contradiction of policy mixes. Numerical experiments validate the characteristics of shared mobility as a supplement to poorly performing public transit under its poor performance. It also examines the policy mix between a public-transit priority subsidy, parking charging, and the shared-mobility subsidy to discover the positive coordination that any individual policy cannot satisfy. This study provides implementable insights for further formulating rational policy-mix strategies on shared mobility to promote the sustainable usage of shared mobility.
政策组合对城市路网容量评估的影响(考虑共享交通
在绿色出行的大趋势下,以网络打车和共享出行为代表的共享出行方式的出现为旅客提供了丰富的行为方式。因此,致力于平衡多式联运网络供需关系的相关部门开始关注将共享交通纳入交通规划并制定合理的政策措施。本文开发了一个包含政策组合的新型运力模型,它是一个双层程序设计问题,其中低层模型是一个考虑弹性需求的组合模式拆分和交通分配(CMSTA-ED)问题,而高层模型则是最大化出发地-目的地(OD)需求乘数。将容量模型(有效性指标)与社会福利(可实施性指标)相结合,可以考虑政策组合的协同性、促进性和潜在矛盾。数值实验验证了在公共交通表现不佳的情况下,共享出行作为公共交通补充的特点。研究还考察了公共交通优先补贴、停车收费和共享交通补贴之间的政策组合,以发现任何单项政策都无法满足的积极协调性。这项研究为进一步制定合理的共享交通政策组合策略,促进共享交通的可持续使用提供了可实施的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信