Examining stated improvement research methods

IF 2.4 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS
Michael S. Garver
{"title":"Examining stated improvement research methods","authors":"Michael S. Garver","doi":"10.1177/14707853241280443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article puts forth stated improvement scales, improvement rankings, maximum difference scaling, and Q-sort as stated improvement research methods identified in the literature. For each method, an overview is provided along with their advantages and disadvantages. Future research needs to examine stated improvement research methods in more detail, to identify best practices for each approach, and to determine which method is the most valid and accurate. Stated improvement methods are proposed as a complimentary analysis to more traditional inferred improvement methods.","PeriodicalId":47641,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Market Research","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Market Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853241280443","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article puts forth stated improvement scales, improvement rankings, maximum difference scaling, and Q-sort as stated improvement research methods identified in the literature. For each method, an overview is provided along with their advantages and disadvantages. Future research needs to examine stated improvement research methods in more detail, to identify best practices for each approach, and to determine which method is the most valid and accurate. Stated improvement methods are proposed as a complimentary analysis to more traditional inferred improvement methods.
审查既定的改进研究方法
本文提出了陈述式改进量表、改进排名、最大差异标度和 Q 排序作为文献中确定的陈述式改进研究方法。文章概述了每种方法的优缺点。未来的研究需要更详细地考察陈述式改进研究方法,确定每种方法的最佳实践,并确定哪种方法最有效、最准确。建议将陈述式改进方法作为更传统的推断式改进方法的补充分析方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Market Research is the essential professional aid for users and providers of market research. IJMR will help you to: KEEP abreast of cutting-edge developments APPLY new research approaches to your business UNDERSTAND new tools and techniques LEARN from the world’s leading research thinkers STAY at the forefront of your profession
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信