Maximum mouth opening in patients with cleft lip and palate or craniofacial anomalies compared with non‐affected controls: A cross‐sectional study

IF 2.3 3区医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

International journal of paediatric dentistry Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1111/ipd.13259

Richard Campbell, Brigitte Trego, Elizabeth S. Gosnell, Matthew Fenchel, Jennifer L. Cully, Jue Wang

{"title":"Maximum mouth opening in patients with cleft lip and palate or craniofacial anomalies compared with non‐affected controls: A cross‐sectional study","authors":"Richard Campbell, Brigitte Trego, Elizabeth S. Gosnell, Matthew Fenchel, Jennifer L. Cully, Jue Wang","doi":"10.1111/ipd.13259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThere are limited published data on maximum mouth opening (MMO) for children with cleft lip or palate (CLP) or craniofacial anomalies (CFA).AimTo report MMO of patients with CLP or CFA compared with non‐affected controls.DesignRetrospective cross‐sectional review of electronic medical and dental records. Patients with CLP or CFA with recorded MMO, height, and weight were included and compared with a non‐affected control individuals seen during orthodontic screening. Outcome measures included MMO, recorded in millimeters of inter‐incisal distance, age, height, weight, and sex.ResultsPatients with CLP or CFA (n = 376) were matched by age and body mass standardized index (BMIz) to the non‐affected pool (n = 376). The affected group had a MMO of 43.14 mm (±7.1 mm) compared with the control group MMO of 48.01 mm (±7.6 mm) with a statistically significant difference of −4.86 mm (p < .0001). Specifically, MMO of the unilateral cleft group is 4.26 mm smaller than that of non‐affected controls (p < .0001). MMO of the bilateral cleft group is 3.65 mm smaller than that of non‐affected controls (p = 0.0063).ConclusionsMMO for patients with CLP was significantly smaller as compared to non‐affected controls. This study helps establish MMO values for children with CLP and CFA.","PeriodicalId":14268,"journal":{"name":"International journal of paediatric dentistry","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of paediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13259","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThere are limited published data on maximum mouth opening (MMO) for children with cleft lip or palate (CLP) or craniofacial anomalies (CFA).AimTo report MMO of patients with CLP or CFA compared with non‐affected controls.DesignRetrospective cross‐sectional review of electronic medical and dental records. Patients with CLP or CFA with recorded MMO, height, and weight were included and compared with a non‐affected control individuals seen during orthodontic screening. Outcome measures included MMO, recorded in millimeters of inter‐incisal distance, age, height, weight, and sex.ResultsPatients with CLP or CFA (n = 376) were matched by age and body mass standardized index (BMIz) to the non‐affected pool (n = 376). The affected group had a MMO of 43.14 mm (±7.1 mm) compared with the control group MMO of 48.01 mm (±7.6 mm) with a statistically significant difference of −4.86 mm (p < .0001). Specifically, MMO of the unilateral cleft group is 4.26 mm smaller than that of non‐affected controls (p < .0001). MMO of the bilateral cleft group is 3.65 mm smaller than that of non‐affected controls (p = 0.0063).ConclusionsMMO for patients with CLP was significantly smaller as compared to non‐affected controls. This study helps establish MMO values for children with CLP and CFA.

查看原文本刊更多论文

唇腭裂或颅面畸形患者的最大张口度与未受影响的对照组相比：横断面研究

背景有关唇腭裂（CLP）或颅面畸形（CFA）儿童最大张口量（MMO）的公开数据有限。目的报告唇腭裂或颅面畸形患者的最大张口量，并与未受影响的对照组进行比较。纳入有 MMO、身高和体重记录的 CLP 或 CFA 患者，并与正畸筛查中的非受影响对照组进行比较。结果测量包括以毫米为单位记录的MMO（龋间距）、年龄、身高、体重和性别。结果CLP或CFA患者（n = 376）的年龄和体重标准化指数（BMIz）与未受影响的对照组（n = 376）相匹配。受影响组的 MMO 为 43.14 毫米（±7.1 毫米），而对照组的 MMO 为 48.01 毫米（±7.6 毫米），两者之间的差异为-4.86 毫米（p <.0001），具有显著的统计学意义。具体而言，单侧裂隙组的 MMO 比未受影响的对照组小 4.26 毫米（p < .0001）。结论与未受影响的对照组相比，CLP 患者的 MMO 明显较小。这项研究有助于确定 CLP 和 CFA 儿童的 MMO 值。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International journal of paediatric dentistry 医学-小儿科

CiteScore

5.50

自引率

2.60%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry was formed in 1991 by the merger of the Journals of the International Association of Paediatric Dentistry and the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry and is published bi-monthly. It has true international scope and aims to promote the highest standard of education, practice and research in paediatric dentistry world-wide. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry publishes papers on all aspects of paediatric dentistry including: growth and development, behaviour management, diagnosis, prevention, restorative treatment and issue relating to medically compromised children or those with disabilities. This peer-reviewed journal features scientific articles, reviews, case reports, clinical techniques, short communications and abstracts of current paediatric dental research. Analytical studies with a scientific novelty value are preferred to descriptive studies. Case reports illustrating unusual conditions and clinically relevant observations are acceptable but must be of sufficiently high quality to be considered for publication; particularly the illustrative material must be of the highest quality.