Navigating the storm: how managers’ decisions shape companies in crisis

IF 7.8 3区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
J. Ulpiano Vázquez-Martínez, Javier Morales-Mediano, Antonio L. Leal-Rodríguez, Carla Pennano-Villanueva
{"title":"Navigating the storm: how managers’ decisions shape companies in crisis","authors":"J. Ulpiano Vázquez-Martínez, Javier Morales-Mediano, Antonio L. Leal-Rodríguez, Carla Pennano-Villanueva","doi":"10.1007/s11846-024-00801-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This research aims to examine how managers responded and behaved in the highly chaotic environment generated by the COVID-19 crisis. Understanding their response is important because each decision taken impacted differently and significantly on their companies’ performance. The first part of the study uses topic modeling to interprets text from 113 interviews with executives published in general media. The second part analyzes responses from 518 managers across 15 countries using PLS-SEM. The survey was conducted during the most severe stage of the pandemic (2020), ensuring real-time opinions from managers rather than relying on recollections. The study’s main finding reveals that managers made strategic/operational and financial decisions, which helped companies adapt and survive in this new environment. However, they had a negative effect on firm performance. These findings delineate significant theoretical implications for managerial decision-making amidst chaotic contexts, as well as guiding practitioners in facing future crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":20992,"journal":{"name":"Review of Managerial Science","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Managerial Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00801-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to examine how managers responded and behaved in the highly chaotic environment generated by the COVID-19 crisis. Understanding their response is important because each decision taken impacted differently and significantly on their companies’ performance. The first part of the study uses topic modeling to interprets text from 113 interviews with executives published in general media. The second part analyzes responses from 518 managers across 15 countries using PLS-SEM. The survey was conducted during the most severe stage of the pandemic (2020), ensuring real-time opinions from managers rather than relying on recollections. The study’s main finding reveals that managers made strategic/operational and financial decisions, which helped companies adapt and survive in this new environment. However, they had a negative effect on firm performance. These findings delineate significant theoretical implications for managerial decision-making amidst chaotic contexts, as well as guiding practitioners in facing future crises.

Abstract Image

驾驭风暴:管理者的决策如何塑造危机中的公司
本研究旨在探讨管理人员在 COVID-19 危机引发的高度混乱环境中是如何应对和表现的。了解他们的反应非常重要,因为他们做出的每项决定都会对公司业绩产生不同程度的重大影响。研究的第一部分采用主题建模的方法,对一般媒体发表的 113 篇高管访谈文本进行解读。第二部分使用 PLS-SEM 分析了来自 15 个国家的 518 名管理人员的回答。调查是在疫情最严重的阶段(2020 年)进行的,确保了管理人员的实时意见,而不是依赖于回忆。研究的主要发现表明,管理人员做出的战略/运营和财务决策有助于公司在新环境中适应和生存。然而,这些决策对公司业绩产生了负面影响。这些发现为混乱环境下的管理决策提供了重要的理论依据,并为从业人员应对未来危机提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
14.50%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Review of Managerial Science (RMS) provides a forum for innovative research from all scientific areas of business administration. The journal publishes original research of high quality and is open to various methodological approaches (analytical modeling, empirical research, experimental work, methodological reasoning etc.). The scope of RMS encompasses – but is not limited to – accounting, auditing, banking, business strategy, corporate governance, entrepreneurship, financial structure and capital markets, health economics, human resources management, information systems, innovation management, insurance, marketing, organization, production and logistics, risk management and taxation. RMS also encourages the submission of papers combining ideas and/or approaches from different areas in an innovative way. Review papers presenting the state of the art of a research area and pointing out new directions for further research are also welcome. The scientific standards of RMS are guaranteed by a rigorous, double-blind peer review process with ad hoc referees and the journal´s internationally composed editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信