Osteosynthesis for mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flap: Which type and why? A French national survey

Abstract

We explored the most suitable osteosynthesis type for mandibular reconstruction using fibula free flap (FFF) given the lack of robust data available. For this, an anonymous survey was e-mailed to 853 head-and-neck surgeons (France) asking about their practices and criteria guiding their osteosynthesis material and method choices. Questions assessed: (1) the most frequently used osteosynthesis type, (2) the explanatory variables related to surgeon career status/surgical specialty, and (3) justifications for osteosynthesis type (scientific, technical, "misuse"). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to test for associations of explanatory variables with plate type or misuse. Overall, 118 (13.8%) surgeons responded, among which flexible non-locking osteosynthesis was preferred (59%). Career status and surgical specialty were significantly associated with material choice. University professors/senior lecturers (OR 5.96 vs academic clinical associates; p = 0.02), but not ear-nose-throat/reconstructive plastic surgeons (OR 0.22 vs maxillofacial surgeons; p = 0.04), were more likely to opt for rigid locking osteosynthesis. Private practitioners preferred flexible non-locking osteosynthesis (OR = 5.03; p = 0.04). Only 18% of surgeons scientifically justified their choices. We considered misuse among 65% of surgeons and this was significantly associated with irregular practice of FFF surgery (OR 2.28 vs > 10 surgeries/year; p = 0.04). Overall, >50% of surgeons mainly rely on habits without scientific arguments assisting in decision-making.