A Behavioral Systems Approach to a Brazilian Restorative Justice Organization

IF 1.6 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Alyson Reis, Aécio Borba, Traci M. Cihon, Emmanuel Zagury Tourinho
{"title":"A Behavioral Systems Approach to a Brazilian Restorative Justice Organization","authors":"Alyson Reis, Aécio Borba, Traci M. Cihon, Emmanuel Zagury Tourinho","doi":"10.1007/s42822-024-00182-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Restorative justice (RJ) corresponds to a set of actions, programs, and practices to promote a more autonomous conflict resolution process. RJ includes involving all individuals who have interest in a particular conflict, seeking reparation for the harm caused to the victim and accountability by the offender, and identifying antecedent or consequent conditions that could be related to such conflicts. This practice is being implemented in Brazil’s justice system as part of a national public policy in an attempt to solve conflicts in a more autonomous fashion, which in turn could reduce the time and cost produced by traditional justice procedures. The main objective of this article is to analyze a Brazilian public organization that works with restorative practices according to the perspective of Behavioral Systems Analysis (BSA). Toward this objective, tools such as Total Performance System (TPS) and metacontingency, and intervention models such as the Behavioral Systems Engineering Model (BSEM) were combined with a literature review to analyze organizational practices. Results suggested gaps between the prescribed public policy and its actual implementation. Some aspects of the analysis are highlighted, including the lack of operationalization of monitoring criteria by the control agencies of the judiciary system and the absence of feedback regarding the service (both by the users of the service and those interested in its delivery). Recommendations such as implementation of a data control system, are provided with the aim of ensuring the success of this organization and the effective implementation of the public policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":44553,"journal":{"name":"Behavior and Social Issues","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior and Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-024-00182-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Restorative justice (RJ) corresponds to a set of actions, programs, and practices to promote a more autonomous conflict resolution process. RJ includes involving all individuals who have interest in a particular conflict, seeking reparation for the harm caused to the victim and accountability by the offender, and identifying antecedent or consequent conditions that could be related to such conflicts. This practice is being implemented in Brazil’s justice system as part of a national public policy in an attempt to solve conflicts in a more autonomous fashion, which in turn could reduce the time and cost produced by traditional justice procedures. The main objective of this article is to analyze a Brazilian public organization that works with restorative practices according to the perspective of Behavioral Systems Analysis (BSA). Toward this objective, tools such as Total Performance System (TPS) and metacontingency, and intervention models such as the Behavioral Systems Engineering Model (BSEM) were combined with a literature review to analyze organizational practices. Results suggested gaps between the prescribed public policy and its actual implementation. Some aspects of the analysis are highlighted, including the lack of operationalization of monitoring criteria by the control agencies of the judiciary system and the absence of feedback regarding the service (both by the users of the service and those interested in its delivery). Recommendations such as implementation of a data control system, are provided with the aim of ensuring the success of this organization and the effective implementation of the public policy.

Abstract Image

巴西恢复性司法组织的行为系统方法
恢复性司法(RJ)是一套行动、方案和做法,旨在促进更加自主的冲突解决过程。恢复性司法包括让所有与特定冲突有利害关系的个人参与进来,寻求对受害者造成的伤害进行赔偿,追究犯罪者的责任,并确定可能与此类冲突有关的前因后果。作为国家公共政策的一部分,巴西司法系统正在实施这种做法,试图以更加自主的方式解决冲突,这反过来又可以减少传统司法程序所产生的时间和成本。本文的主要目的是根据行为系统分析(BSA)的视角,对巴西一家采用恢复性实践的公共组织进行分析。为实现这一目标,我们将全面绩效系统(TPS)、元权变等工具和行为系统工程模型(BSEM)等干预模型与文献综述相结合,对组织实践进行了分析。结果表明,规定的公共政策与实际执行之间存在差距。分析的某些方面得到了强调,包括司法系统控制机构缺乏监测标准的可操作性,以及缺乏对服务的反馈(包括服务用户和对服务提供感兴趣的人)。为确保该组织的成功和公共政策的有效实施,提出了实施数据控制系统等建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavior and Social Issues
Behavior and Social Issues PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The primary intellectual framework for Behavior and Social Issues is the science of behavior analysis and its sub-discipline of cultural systems analysis, but contributions from contrasting viewpoints will occasionally be considered if of specific interest to behavior analysts. We recommend that potential authors examine recent issues to determine whether their work is appropriate to the journal. Appropriate contributions include theoretical and conceptual analyses, research articles and brief reports, dialogues, and research reviews. Behavior and Social Issues is an appropriate forum for the work of senior scholars in the field, many of whom serve on the editorial board, as well as for the work of emerging scholars, including students, who have an interest in the contributions of a natural science of behavior to constructing cultures of social justice, human rights, and environmental sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信