Urgent issues and prospects on investigative interviews with children and adolescents

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Victoria Talwar, Angela M. Crossman, Stephanie Block, Sonja Brubacher, Rachel Dianiska, Ana Karen Espinosa Becerra, Gail Goodman, Mary Lyn Huffman, Michael E. Lamb, Kamala London, David La Rooy, Thomas D. Lyon, Lindsay C. Malloy, Lauren Maltby, Van P. Nguyen Greco, Martine Powell, Jodi Quas, Corey J. Rood, Sydney D. Spyksma, Linda C. Steele, Zsofia Szojka, Yuerui Wu, Breanne Wylie
{"title":"Urgent issues and prospects on investigative interviews with children and adolescents","authors":"Victoria Talwar, Angela M. Crossman, Stephanie Block, Sonja Brubacher, Rachel Dianiska, Ana Karen Espinosa Becerra, Gail Goodman, Mary Lyn Huffman, Michael E. Lamb, Kamala London, David La Rooy, Thomas D. Lyon, Lindsay C. Malloy, Lauren Maltby, Van P. Nguyen Greco, Martine Powell, Jodi Quas, Corey J. Rood, Sydney D. Spyksma, Linda C. Steele, Zsofia Szojka, Yuerui Wu, Breanne Wylie","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.12269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While there has been considerable research on investigative interviews with children over the last three decades, there remains much to learn. The aim of this paper was to identify some of the issues and prospects for future scientific study that most urgently need to be addressed. Across 10 commentaries, leading scholars and practitioners highlight areas where additional research is needed on investigative interview practices with youths. Overarching themes include the need for better understanding of rapport‐building and its impact, as well as greater focus on social‐cultural and developmental factors and the needs of adolescents. There are calls to examine how interviews are occurring in real‐world contexts to better inform best practice recommendations in the field, to find means for ensuring better adherence to best practices among various groups of practitioners, and to understand their importance and impact when not followed, including by those testifying in courts. All reflect the need to better address that recurring challenge of reliably and consistently eliciting accurate and credible information from potentially reluctant young witnesses.","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12269","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While there has been considerable research on investigative interviews with children over the last three decades, there remains much to learn. The aim of this paper was to identify some of the issues and prospects for future scientific study that most urgently need to be addressed. Across 10 commentaries, leading scholars and practitioners highlight areas where additional research is needed on investigative interview practices with youths. Overarching themes include the need for better understanding of rapport‐building and its impact, as well as greater focus on social‐cultural and developmental factors and the needs of adolescents. There are calls to examine how interviews are occurring in real‐world contexts to better inform best practice recommendations in the field, to find means for ensuring better adherence to best practices among various groups of practitioners, and to understand their importance and impact when not followed, including by those testifying in courts. All reflect the need to better address that recurring challenge of reliably and consistently eliciting accurate and credible information from potentially reluctant young witnesses.
与儿童和青少年进行调查访谈的紧迫问题和前景展望
虽然过去三十年来对儿童调查性访谈进行了大量研究,但仍有许多东西需要学习。本文旨在确定一些最迫切需要解决的问题和未来科学研究的前景。在 10 篇评论中,知名学者和从业人员强调了需要对青少年调查访谈实践进行更多研究的领域。首要主题包括:需要更好地了解建立融洽关系及其影响,以及更加关注社会文化和发展因素以及青少年的需求。还有人呼吁研究现实世界中面谈是如何进行的,以便更好地为该领域的最佳实践建议提供信息,找到确保各类从业人员更好地遵守最佳实践的方法,并了解不遵守最佳实践的重要性和影响,包括那些在法庭上作证的人。所有这些都反映出有必要更好地应对反复出现的挑战,即从可能不情愿的年轻证人那里可靠、一致地获取准确、可信的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Legal and Criminological Psychology publishes original papers in all areas of psychology and law: - victimology - policing and crime detection - crime prevention - management of offenders - mental health and the law - public attitudes to law - role of the expert witness - impact of law on behaviour - interviewing and eyewitness testimony - jury decision making - deception The journal publishes papers which advance professional and scientific knowledge defined broadly as the application of psychology to law and interdisciplinary enquiry in legal and psychological fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信