Pore pressure estimation of the calcareous formations in the Middle Magdalena Valley Basin, Colombia

IF 2.3 4区 地球科学
Melina Rivera, Luis Alfredo Montes, Luis Antonio Castillo
{"title":"Pore pressure estimation of the calcareous formations in the Middle Magdalena Valley Basin, Colombia","authors":"Melina Rivera, Luis Alfredo Montes, Luis Antonio Castillo","doi":"10.1007/s11600-024-01357-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The reliable prediction of pore pressure is essential for petroleum engineering in its different stages, with the Eaton and Bowers' methods being the most used for this purpose. However, their application in carbonate rocks still needs to be improved because carbonates do not compact uniformly with depth, as shale does. This research calculated the pore pressure using the Eaton, Bowers, and Weakley methods and well logs of a carbonate formation and found that the Weakley's approach predicts pressure more accurately. The method presented uses an acoustic impedance equation derived from the Bowers' method, whose parameters were calibrated with the Weakley's pore pressure profile. The pore pressure estimated near the borehole, via the acoustic impedance provided by the pre-stack inversion, is very close to that observed during drilling, which indicates a reliable prediction. The method was applied to a seismic line and well logs in the Middle Magdalena Valley Basin—Colombia, where the overpressured well Lizama 158 caused a significant environmental disaster in 2018. The obtained subsurface pore pressure distribution is reliable, matches overpressure in calcareous rocks near the well, and estimates anomalous pressure in zones distant from the well.</p>","PeriodicalId":6988,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geophysica","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geophysica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-024-01357-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reliable prediction of pore pressure is essential for petroleum engineering in its different stages, with the Eaton and Bowers' methods being the most used for this purpose. However, their application in carbonate rocks still needs to be improved because carbonates do not compact uniformly with depth, as shale does. This research calculated the pore pressure using the Eaton, Bowers, and Weakley methods and well logs of a carbonate formation and found that the Weakley's approach predicts pressure more accurately. The method presented uses an acoustic impedance equation derived from the Bowers' method, whose parameters were calibrated with the Weakley's pore pressure profile. The pore pressure estimated near the borehole, via the acoustic impedance provided by the pre-stack inversion, is very close to that observed during drilling, which indicates a reliable prediction. The method was applied to a seismic line and well logs in the Middle Magdalena Valley Basin—Colombia, where the overpressured well Lizama 158 caused a significant environmental disaster in 2018. The obtained subsurface pore pressure distribution is reliable, matches overpressure in calcareous rocks near the well, and estimates anomalous pressure in zones distant from the well.

Abstract Image

哥伦比亚中马格达莱纳河谷盆地钙质地层的孔隙压力估算
可靠的孔隙压力预测对石油工程的不同阶段都至关重要,其中最常用的是伊顿和鲍尔斯方法。然而,它们在碳酸盐岩中的应用仍有待改进,因为碳酸盐岩不像页岩那样随深度均匀致密。这项研究使用伊顿、鲍尔和韦克利方法以及碳酸盐岩层的测井记录计算孔隙压力,结果发现韦克利方法预测压力更为准确。所介绍的方法使用了从 Bowers 方法中推导出的声阻抗方程,其参数根据 Weakley 的孔隙压力曲线进行了校准。通过叠前反演提供的声阻抗估算出的钻孔附近的孔隙压力与钻探过程中观测到的孔隙压力非常接近,这表明预测结果是可靠的。该方法被应用于哥伦比亚中马格达莱纳河谷盆地的地震测线和测井记录,该盆地的 Lizama 158 井超压在 2018 年造成了重大环境灾难。所获得的地下孔隙压力分布是可靠的,与油井附近钙质岩石中的超压相匹配,并估算了远离油井区域的异常压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Geophysica
Acta Geophysica GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
251
期刊介绍: Acta Geophysica is open to all kinds of manuscripts including research and review articles, short communications, comments to published papers, letters to the Editor as well as book reviews. Some of the issues are fully devoted to particular topics; we do encourage proposals for such topical issues. We accept submissions from scientists world-wide, offering high scientific and editorial standard and comprehensive treatment of the discussed topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信