Quadruplet therapy for newly diagnosed myeloma: comparative analysis of sequential cohorts with triplet therapy lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (RVd) versus daratumamab with RVD (DRVd) in transplant-eligible patients

IF 12.9 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Nisha S. Joseph, Jonathan L. Kaufman, Vilas A. Gupta, Craig C. Hofmeister, Madhav V. Dhodapkar, Lawrence H. Boise, Sara M. DiCamillo, Danielle Roberts, Ajay K. Nooka, Sagar Lonial
{"title":"Quadruplet therapy for newly diagnosed myeloma: comparative analysis of sequential cohorts with triplet therapy lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (RVd) versus daratumamab with RVD (DRVd) in transplant-eligible patients","authors":"Nisha S. Joseph, Jonathan L. Kaufman, Vilas A. Gupta, Craig C. Hofmeister, Madhav V. Dhodapkar, Lawrence H. Boise, Sara M. DiCamillo, Danielle Roberts, Ajay K. Nooka, Sagar Lonial","doi":"10.1038/s41408-024-01120-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) have previously been established as standard-of-care induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). More recently, randomized phase 3 data have demonstrated the benefit of the addition of daratumumab (Dara-RVd) to the RVd backbone in terms of improved both depth of response and long-term survival benefit as measured by progression-free survival (PFS). Our group has previously published on a historical cohort of 1000 NDMM patients uniformly treated with RVd induction with impressive both PFS and overall survival. Here, we present a comparative analysis of our RVd cohort with a recent cohort of 326 patients induced with Dara-RVd at our institution with intent to transplant. This analysis demonstrates the utility of this regimen in real-world clinical practice and provides additional insights into D-RVd performance in patient subsets often underrepresented in clinical trials, as well as the impact of daratumumab in maintenance for NDMM patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8989,"journal":{"name":"Blood Cancer Journal","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-024-01120-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) have previously been established as standard-of-care induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). More recently, randomized phase 3 data have demonstrated the benefit of the addition of daratumumab (Dara-RVd) to the RVd backbone in terms of improved both depth of response and long-term survival benefit as measured by progression-free survival (PFS). Our group has previously published on a historical cohort of 1000 NDMM patients uniformly treated with RVd induction with impressive both PFS and overall survival. Here, we present a comparative analysis of our RVd cohort with a recent cohort of 326 patients induced with Dara-RVd at our institution with intent to transplant. This analysis demonstrates the utility of this regimen in real-world clinical practice and provides additional insights into D-RVd performance in patient subsets often underrepresented in clinical trials, as well as the impact of daratumumab in maintenance for NDMM patients.

Abstract Image

新诊断骨髓瘤的四联疗法:对符合移植条件的患者使用来那度胺、硼替佐米和地塞米松三联疗法(RVd)与达拉单抗加RVD(DRVd)的序列队列进行比较分析
来那度胺、硼替佐米和地塞米松(RVd)曾被确定为新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)的标准诱导疗法。最近,随机3期数据显示,在RVd基础上添加达拉土单抗(Dara-RVd)可改善反应深度和无进展生存期(PFS)所衡量的长期生存获益。我们的研究小组曾发表过一个历史队列,该队列中有1000名NDMM患者统一接受了RVd诱导治疗,他们的无进展生存期和总生存期都令人印象深刻。在此,我们将我们的RVd队列与本机构最近用Dara-RVd诱导的326名患者队列进行了比较分析。这项分析表明了该方案在实际临床实践中的实用性,并提供了更多关于D-RVd在临床试验中通常代表性不足的患者亚群中的表现,以及达拉土单抗在NDMM患者维持治疗中的影响的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
2.30%
发文量
153
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Cancer Journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality articles related to hematologic malignancies and related disorders. The journal welcomes submissions of original research, reviews, guidelines, and letters that are deemed to have a significant impact in the field. While the journal covers a wide range of topics, it particularly focuses on areas such as: Preclinical studies of new compounds, especially those that provide mechanistic insights Clinical trials and observations Reviews related to new drugs and current management of hematologic malignancies Novel observations related to new mutations, molecular pathways, and tumor genomics Blood Cancer Journal offers a forum for expedited publication of novel observations regarding new mutations or altered pathways.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信