Multiculturalism in dominant ethnic populations: A transnational profile analysis

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
{"title":"Multiculturalism in dominant ethnic populations: A transnational profile analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Following a person-centered approach, the present study investigates support for multiculturalism of dominant ethnic members. Using Latent Profile Analysis, the current investigation aimed to identify subgroups of dominant ethnic participants and examine potential difference in their endorsement of multiculturalism towards subaltern ethnic groups. Based on the existing literature, subgroups of dominant members were identified along with the combination of multiple obstacles (i.e., national identity and intolerance) and resources (i.e., positive intergroup contact, psychological resilience and universalism) towards the endorsement of multiculturalism. Findings from a transnational sample of individuals (N. 636) across three Southern European Countries (i.e., Italy, Portugal and Spain) yielded five distinct profiles (i.e., <em>Cosmopolitans</em>, <em>Glocals</em>, <em>Parochials</em>, <em>Resilient Intolerants</em> and <em>Disengaged</em>). Also, they indicated that the identified subgroups differed on patterns of key psychosocial variables and degree of endorsement of multiculturalism. The majority of the sample (<em>Cosmopolitans</em>, <em>Glocals</em> and <em>Disegnaged</em>) show high level of multiculturalism, despite interesting differences characterized the distribution of the profiles across the three countries: the more intolerant profiles (<em>Parochials</em> and <em>Resilient Intolerants</em>) were prevalent in Italy. Contrarily to our expectations, national identity was not exclusionary per se, as has been reported elsewhere. Rather, depending on its combination with other key variables, it worked either as an obstacle or as a resource towards the support for multiculturalism of dominant ethnic members. Potential contributions of Latent Profile Analysis for an in depth understanding of multiculturalism and implications for interventions are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724001202/pdfft?md5=8b18f5fa6f3261d34e838a83eaaf4c49&pid=1-s2.0-S0147176724001202-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724001202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following a person-centered approach, the present study investigates support for multiculturalism of dominant ethnic members. Using Latent Profile Analysis, the current investigation aimed to identify subgroups of dominant ethnic participants and examine potential difference in their endorsement of multiculturalism towards subaltern ethnic groups. Based on the existing literature, subgroups of dominant members were identified along with the combination of multiple obstacles (i.e., national identity and intolerance) and resources (i.e., positive intergroup contact, psychological resilience and universalism) towards the endorsement of multiculturalism. Findings from a transnational sample of individuals (N. 636) across three Southern European Countries (i.e., Italy, Portugal and Spain) yielded five distinct profiles (i.e., Cosmopolitans, Glocals, Parochials, Resilient Intolerants and Disengaged). Also, they indicated that the identified subgroups differed on patterns of key psychosocial variables and degree of endorsement of multiculturalism. The majority of the sample (Cosmopolitans, Glocals and Disegnaged) show high level of multiculturalism, despite interesting differences characterized the distribution of the profiles across the three countries: the more intolerant profiles (Parochials and Resilient Intolerants) were prevalent in Italy. Contrarily to our expectations, national identity was not exclusionary per se, as has been reported elsewhere. Rather, depending on its combination with other key variables, it worked either as an obstacle or as a resource towards the support for multiculturalism of dominant ethnic members. Potential contributions of Latent Profile Analysis for an in depth understanding of multiculturalism and implications for interventions are discussed.

主流民族人口中的多元文化主义:跨国概况分析
本研究采用以人为本的方法,调查占主导地位的少数民族成员对多元文化主义的支持情况。本研究采用潜特征分析法,旨在确定优势族群参与者的亚群,并研究他们对次要族群认可多元文化主义的潜在差异。在现有文献的基础上,确定了主导成员的亚群,以及支持多元文化主义的多重障碍(即民族认同和不容忍)和资源(即积极的群体间接触、心理复原力和普遍主义)的组合。对三个南欧国家(意大利、葡萄牙和西班牙)的个人(636 人)进行跨国抽样调查的结果显示了五种不同的特征(即世界主义者(Cosmopolitans)、庸俗主义者(Glocals)、偏狭主义者(Parochials)、不容忍者(Resilient Intolerants)和脱离者(Disengaged))。此外,他们还指出,所确定的亚群体在关键的社会心理变量模式和对多元文化主义的认可程度方面存在差异。尽管三个国家的样本分布存在着有趣的差异,但大多数样本(世界主义者、庸俗主义者和脱离现实者)都表现出较高的多元文化主义水平:不宽容的样本(偏狭者和坚韧的不宽容者)在意大利很普遍。与我们的预期不同,国家认同本身并不像其他地方报道的那样具有排斥性。相反,根据其与其他关键变量的组合,它既可以成为主流民族成员支持多元文化的障碍,也可以成为其支持多元文化的资源。本文讨论了潜在特征分析对深入了解多元文化主义的潜在贡献以及对干预措施的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信