Development of a Multi-Objective optimization framework for Earth-to-Air heat Exchanger Systems: Enhancing thermal performance and economic viability in Moroccan climates

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
{"title":"Development of a Multi-Objective optimization framework for Earth-to-Air heat Exchanger Systems: Enhancing thermal performance and economic viability in Moroccan climates","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, a multi-objective optimization framework is developed to provide a comprehensive approach to designing efficient and cost-effective Earth-to-Air Heat Exchanger systems (EAHE). By integrating sensitivity analysis, design of experiments, genetic algorithms, and multi-criteria decision-making, the framework addresses the complexities of balancing thermal performance and economic viability. Through an experimentally validated model of the exchanger, the study conducts sensitivity analyses to identify key design parameters and uses a fine-tuned genetic algorithm for optimization. The optimization focuses on minimizing the life cycle cost (LCC) and maximizing the cooling potential across three distinct Moroccan climates. Furthermore, multi-criteria decision-making methods were employed to determine an optimal solution from the multi-objective optimization results. Results indicate that the optimal exchanger configurations vary with location, highlighting the importance of site-specific design. For instance, the optimal design selected for Marrakech and Oujda is a pipe of 160 mm of diameter with 49 m of length and buried at 3 m, while for Errachidia it is a 160 mm pipe with 47 m of length and buried at 4 m since the location has a higher gradient of ground temperature. The EAHE gave a cooling potential of 1447 kWh/year, 1172 kWh/year and 1739 kWh/year with a LCC of 4122$, 4091$ and 4073$ over 50 years for Marrakech, Oujda and Errachidia, respectively. The normalized life cycle cost (NLCC) is the lowest for Errachidia (0.234$/kWh), followed by Marrakech (0.285$/kWh) then Oujda (0.349$/kWh).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890424009658","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, a multi-objective optimization framework is developed to provide a comprehensive approach to designing efficient and cost-effective Earth-to-Air Heat Exchanger systems (EAHE). By integrating sensitivity analysis, design of experiments, genetic algorithms, and multi-criteria decision-making, the framework addresses the complexities of balancing thermal performance and economic viability. Through an experimentally validated model of the exchanger, the study conducts sensitivity analyses to identify key design parameters and uses a fine-tuned genetic algorithm for optimization. The optimization focuses on minimizing the life cycle cost (LCC) and maximizing the cooling potential across three distinct Moroccan climates. Furthermore, multi-criteria decision-making methods were employed to determine an optimal solution from the multi-objective optimization results. Results indicate that the optimal exchanger configurations vary with location, highlighting the importance of site-specific design. For instance, the optimal design selected for Marrakech and Oujda is a pipe of 160 mm of diameter with 49 m of length and buried at 3 m, while for Errachidia it is a 160 mm pipe with 47 m of length and buried at 4 m since the location has a higher gradient of ground temperature. The EAHE gave a cooling potential of 1447 kWh/year, 1172 kWh/year and 1739 kWh/year with a LCC of 4122$, 4091$ and 4073$ over 50 years for Marrakech, Oujda and Errachidia, respectively. The normalized life cycle cost (NLCC) is the lowest for Errachidia (0.234$/kWh), followed by Marrakech (0.285$/kWh) then Oujda (0.349$/kWh).

开发土-气换热器系统的多目标优化框架:提高摩洛哥气候条件下的热性能和经济可行性
本研究开发了一个多目标优化框架,为设计高效、经济的地气换热器系统(EAHE)提供了一种综合方法。通过整合灵敏度分析、实验设计、遗传算法和多标准决策,该框架解决了平衡热性能和经济可行性的复杂问题。该研究通过实验验证的热交换器模型,进行敏感性分析以确定关键设计参数,并使用微调遗传算法进行优化。优化的重点是使寿命周期成本(LCC)最小化,并使摩洛哥三种不同气候条件下的冷却潜力最大化。此外,还采用了多标准决策方法,从多目标优化结果中确定最佳解决方案。结果表明,最佳交换器配置因地点而异,这突出了针对具体地点进行设计的重要性。例如,马拉喀什和乌季达选择的最佳设计是直径为 160 毫米、长度为 49 米、埋设在 3 米处的管道,而 Errachidia 选择的最佳设计是直径为 160 毫米、长度为 47 米、埋设在 4 米处的管道,因为该地区的地温梯度较大。根据 EAHE 计算,马拉喀什、乌季达和 Errachidia 的制冷潜力分别为 1447 千瓦时/年、1172 千瓦时/年和 1739 千瓦时/年,50 年的生命周期成本分别为 4122 美元、4091 美元和 4073 美元。埃拉希迪亚的归一化生命周期成本(NLCC)最低(0.234 美元/千瓦时),其次是马拉喀什(0.285 美元/千瓦时)和乌季达(0.349 美元/千瓦时)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信