Digital Economy's influence on R&D Network configurations: Integrating resource dependence theory and institutional theory

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Zeyu Xing , Haydar Yalçin , Tugrul Daim
{"title":"Digital Economy's influence on R&D Network configurations: Integrating resource dependence theory and institutional theory","authors":"Zeyu Xing ,&nbsp;Haydar Yalçin ,&nbsp;Tugrul Daim","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study addresses the transformative impacts of the digital economy, which forges connections throughout Research &amp; Development (R&amp;D) networks, prompting leaders of forward-thinking organizations to predict market shifts, guided by the frameworks of institutional theory and resource dependence theory. Institutional theory highlights the pressures, both coercive and normative, arising from the digital economy and regulatory environments, whereas resource dependence theory elucidates the strategic approaches organizations adopt to acquire vital resources and minimize network dependencies. This innovative research investigates how an organization's orientation towards the digital economy affects its role within R&amp;D networks, leveraging insights from both theoretical standpoints. By pinpointing technology transformation and legal environment as key moderators, this study assesses their moderating effects. The analysis utilizes a comprehensive dataset containing 141,118 patents spanning from 1995 to 2018, concentrating on R&amp;D efforts within China's strategic emerging sectors. The outcomes show that an organization's digital economy orientation, shaped by institutional norms and resource interdependencies, positively influences its network centrality but negatively impacts its structural hole position. Additionally, technology transformation and the legal environment, as institutional mechanisms, negatively modulate the relationship between digital economy orientation and network centrality, but positively influence the structural hole relationship. The study concludes with a bibliometric analysis to situate our findings within existing literature and discusses the theoretical and practical implications, rooted in institutional and resource dependence theories.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 103098"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224001482","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study addresses the transformative impacts of the digital economy, which forges connections throughout Research & Development (R&D) networks, prompting leaders of forward-thinking organizations to predict market shifts, guided by the frameworks of institutional theory and resource dependence theory. Institutional theory highlights the pressures, both coercive and normative, arising from the digital economy and regulatory environments, whereas resource dependence theory elucidates the strategic approaches organizations adopt to acquire vital resources and minimize network dependencies. This innovative research investigates how an organization's orientation towards the digital economy affects its role within R&D networks, leveraging insights from both theoretical standpoints. By pinpointing technology transformation and legal environment as key moderators, this study assesses their moderating effects. The analysis utilizes a comprehensive dataset containing 141,118 patents spanning from 1995 to 2018, concentrating on R&D efforts within China's strategic emerging sectors. The outcomes show that an organization's digital economy orientation, shaped by institutional norms and resource interdependencies, positively influences its network centrality but negatively impacts its structural hole position. Additionally, technology transformation and the legal environment, as institutional mechanisms, negatively modulate the relationship between digital economy orientation and network centrality, but positively influence the structural hole relationship. The study concludes with a bibliometric analysis to situate our findings within existing literature and discusses the theoretical and practical implications, rooted in institutional and resource dependence theories.

数字经济对研发网络配置的影响:整合资源依赖理论和制度理论
本研究探讨了数字经济的变革性影响,数字经济在整个研究与开发(R&D)网络中建立了联系,促使具有前瞻性思维的组织领导者在制度理论和资源依赖理论的框架指导下预测市场变化。制度理论强调了数字经济和监管环境带来的强制和规范压力,而资源依赖理论则阐明了组织为获取重要资源和尽量减少网络依赖性而采取的战略方法。这项创新性研究利用两种理论观点的见解,探讨了组织对数字经济的定位如何影响其在研发网络中的角色。通过将技术转型和法律环境作为关键调节因素,本研究评估了它们的调节作用。分析利用了一个包含 141118 项专利的综合数据集,时间跨度从 1995 年到 2018 年,主要集中在中国战略性新兴产业的研发领域。研究结果表明,一个组织的数字经济取向受制度规范和资源相互依赖的影响,对其网络中心性有积极影响,但对其结构洞位置有消极影响。此外,技术变革和法律环境作为制度机制,对数字经济导向和网络中心度之间的关系产生了负面影响,但对结构洞关系产生了正面影响。研究最后通过文献计量分析,将我们的发现置于现有文献中,并讨论了植根于制度和资源依赖理论的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信