Bless her heart: Gossip phrased with concern provides advantages in female intrasexual competition

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Tania A. Reynolds , Jon K. Maner , Roy F. Baumeister
{"title":"Bless her heart: Gossip phrased with concern provides advantages in female intrasexual competition","authors":"Tania A. Reynolds ,&nbsp;Jon K. Maner ,&nbsp;Roy F. Baumeister","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although many women report being victimized by gossip, fewer report spreading negative gossip. Female gossipers might be unaware they are gossiping if they disclose such statements out of concern for targets. Four studies (<em>N</em> = 1709) investigated whether women believe their gossip is motivated by concern and whether expressing concern for targets insulates female gossipers against social costs, while simultaneously impairing targets' reputations. Study 1 examined sex differences in gossip motivations. Compared to men, women endorsed stronger concern than harm motivations, especially when gossiping about other women, suggesting these motivations characterize female intrasexual gossip. In Study 2, female gossipers who phrased their negative gossip with concern (versus maliciously or neutrally) were evaluated as more trustworthy and desirable as social and romantic partners. Study 3 replicated the favorable evaluations of concerned female gossipers. Female participants especially disliked malicious female gossipers, suggesting professions of concern might help to avoid women's scorn. Male participants reported lower romantic interest in female gossip targets when they learned concern (versus malicious or no) gossip, suggesting concerned gossip can harm female targets' romantic prospects. Study 4 revealed these patterns extend to face-to-face interactions. A female gossiper was preferred as a social partner when she phrased her gossip with concern versus maliciously. Moreover, concerned gossip harmed perceptions of the female target as effectively as malicious gossip. Altogether, findings suggest that negative gossip delivered with concern effectively harms female targets' reputations, while also protecting gossipers' reputations, indicating a viable strategy in female intrasexual competition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103124000830","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although many women report being victimized by gossip, fewer report spreading negative gossip. Female gossipers might be unaware they are gossiping if they disclose such statements out of concern for targets. Four studies (N = 1709) investigated whether women believe their gossip is motivated by concern and whether expressing concern for targets insulates female gossipers against social costs, while simultaneously impairing targets' reputations. Study 1 examined sex differences in gossip motivations. Compared to men, women endorsed stronger concern than harm motivations, especially when gossiping about other women, suggesting these motivations characterize female intrasexual gossip. In Study 2, female gossipers who phrased their negative gossip with concern (versus maliciously or neutrally) were evaluated as more trustworthy and desirable as social and romantic partners. Study 3 replicated the favorable evaluations of concerned female gossipers. Female participants especially disliked malicious female gossipers, suggesting professions of concern might help to avoid women's scorn. Male participants reported lower romantic interest in female gossip targets when they learned concern (versus malicious or no) gossip, suggesting concerned gossip can harm female targets' romantic prospects. Study 4 revealed these patterns extend to face-to-face interactions. A female gossiper was preferred as a social partner when she phrased her gossip with concern versus maliciously. Moreover, concerned gossip harmed perceptions of the female target as effectively as malicious gossip. Altogether, findings suggest that negative gossip delivered with concern effectively harms female targets' reputations, while also protecting gossipers' reputations, indicating a viable strategy in female intrasexual competition.

祝福她以关心为措辞的流言在雌性内部竞争中具有优势
尽管许多女性都报告说自己是流言蜚语的受害者,但报告说自己传播负面流言蜚语的女性却很少。如果女性说闲话者出于对目标的关心而披露这些言论,她们可能并不知道自己在说闲话。四项研究(N = 1709)调查了女性是否认为她们说闲话的动机是出于关心,以及对目标表达关心是否会使女性说闲话者免于承担社会成本,同时损害目标的声誉。研究 1 探讨了流言动机的性别差异。与男性相比,女性的关心动机强于伤害动机,尤其是在说其他女性的闲话时,这表明这些动机是女性性内闲话的特点。在研究 2 中,以关心(而不是恶意或中立)的方式表达负面流言的女性被评价为更值得信赖,更适合作为社交和恋爱伙伴。研究 3 复制了关注女性八卦者的良好评价。女性参与者尤其不喜欢恶意说闲话的女性,这表明关心女性可能有助于避免女性的鄙视。男性受试者报告说,当他们了解到关心型(相对于恶意或无关心型)八卦时,他们对女性八卦对象的浪漫兴趣降低了,这表明关心型八卦会损害女性八卦对象的浪漫前景。研究 4 显示,这些模式也适用于面对面的互动。当女性八卦者以关心的方式而不是恶意的方式表达她的八卦时,她会更喜欢作为社交伙伴。此外,关注性流言与恶意流言一样有效地损害了女性目标的看法。总之,研究结果表明,带着关心的负面流言会有效地损害女性目标的声誉,同时也保护了流言者的声誉,这表明在女性的性内竞争中,这是一种可行的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Social Psychology publishes original research and theory on human social behavior and related phenomena. The journal emphasizes empirical, conceptually based research that advances an understanding of important social psychological processes. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical analyses, and methodological comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信