A Systematic Literature Review of Policy Analysis and Modeling in Systems Engineering

Shamsnaz Virani Bhada, Dana Polojärvi, Erika Palmer
{"title":"A Systematic Literature Review of Policy Analysis and Modeling in Systems Engineering","authors":"Shamsnaz Virani Bhada,&nbsp;Dana Polojärvi,&nbsp;Erika Palmer","doi":"10.1002/iis2.13232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) defines systems engineering as “a transdisciplinary and integrative approach to enable the successful realization, use, and retirement of engineered systems, using systems principles and concepts, and scientific, technological, and management methods.” The evolution of engineering practices requires new research in the disciplinary intersections of scientific, technological, and management methods, especially when considering the INCOSE System Engineering Vision of 2035, which identified political, economic, social, technical, environmental, and legal factors as becoming modern tenets of system engineering success. Because vast amounts of research have been performed in multidisciplinary engineering areas, this paper examines the research landscape at the intersection of policy modeling and systems engineering by providing a systematic review of the literature to help guide future research based on trends and various guiding considerations. The results of this study will help identify gaps in the field while clarifying future research needs. We have applied the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) protocol, which yielded 38 peer-reviewed papers related to policy modeling and systems engineering.</p>","PeriodicalId":100663,"journal":{"name":"INCOSE International Symposium","volume":"34 1","pages":"1687-1704"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INCOSE International Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iis2.13232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) defines systems engineering as “a transdisciplinary and integrative approach to enable the successful realization, use, and retirement of engineered systems, using systems principles and concepts, and scientific, technological, and management methods.” The evolution of engineering practices requires new research in the disciplinary intersections of scientific, technological, and management methods, especially when considering the INCOSE System Engineering Vision of 2035, which identified political, economic, social, technical, environmental, and legal factors as becoming modern tenets of system engineering success. Because vast amounts of research have been performed in multidisciplinary engineering areas, this paper examines the research landscape at the intersection of policy modeling and systems engineering by providing a systematic review of the literature to help guide future research based on trends and various guiding considerations. The results of this study will help identify gaps in the field while clarifying future research needs. We have applied the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) protocol, which yielded 38 peer-reviewed papers related to policy modeling and systems engineering.

系统工程中的政策分析和建模系统文献综述
国际系统工程理事会(INCOSE)将系统工程定义为 "一种跨学科的综合方法,利用系统原理和概念,以及科学、技术和管理方法,使工程系统得以成功实现、使用和报废"。工程实践的发展要求在科学、技术和管理方法的学科交叉方面开展新的研究,尤其是考虑到 INCOSE 系统工程 2035 年愿景,该愿景认为政治、经济、社会、技术、环境和法律因素已成为系统工程成功的现代信条。由于在多学科工程领域已经开展了大量研究,本文通过对文献进行系统回顾,考察了政策建模与系统工程交叉领域的研究情况,以帮助指导基于趋势和各种指导性考虑因素的未来研究。本研究的结果将有助于找出该领域的差距,同时明确未来的研究需求。我们采用了系统综述和荟萃分析(PRISMA)协议的首选报告项目,共收集到 38 篇与政策建模和系统工程相关的同行评审论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信