Different patterns of national innovation under COVID-19: The moderating role of culture

IF 2.4 2区社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

International Journal of Intercultural Relations Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102058

Ling Liu , Hang Zheng , Yiwan Peng , Feng Zhu , Ting Xue

{"title":"Different patterns of national innovation under COVID-19: The moderating role of culture","authors":"Ling Liu , Hang Zheng , Yiwan Peng , Feng Zhu , Ting Xue","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the post-pandemic era, there has been a renewed examination of the impact of COVID-19 on the global economy, aiming to discern potential patterns within this intricate phenomenon. This study categorizes the spread of COVID-19 into five distinct phases, as delineated by <span><span>Huang et al. (2023)</span></span>, utilizing data from 115 nations within the Global Innovation Index. We analyzed the impact of the spread rate of COVID-19 on national innovation and the moderating role of collectivist culture during the period between 2020 and 2022. The results showed that collectivist culture positively moderated the correlation between the spread rate of COVID-19 and knowledge as well as technological output in the Entry and Takeoff phases. In the Proliferation phase, individualistic culture positively moderated the correlation between the spread rate of COVID-19 and national innovation, and in-group collectivist culture positively moderated the correlation between the spread rate of COVID-19 and the input and output of national innovation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 102058"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724001275","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the post-pandemic era, there has been a renewed examination of the impact of COVID-19 on the global economy, aiming to discern potential patterns within this intricate phenomenon. This study categorizes the spread of COVID-19 into five distinct phases, as delineated by Huang et al. (2023), utilizing data from 115 nations within the Global Innovation Index. We analyzed the impact of the spread rate of COVID-19 on national innovation and the moderating role of collectivist culture during the period between 2020 and 2022. The results showed that collectivist culture positively moderated the correlation between the spread rate of COVID-19 and knowledge as well as technological output in the Entry and Takeoff phases. In the Proliferation phase, individualistic culture positively moderated the correlation between the spread rate of COVID-19 and national innovation, and in-group collectivist culture positively moderated the correlation between the spread rate of COVID-19 and the input and output of national innovation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

COVID-19 下不同的国家创新模式：文化的调节作用

在后流行病时代，人们重新审视 COVID-19 对全球经济的影响，旨在发现这一错综复杂现象的潜在模式。本研究利用全球创新指数（Global Innovation Index）中 115 个国家的数据，将 COVID-19 的传播分为黄等人（2023 年）所划分的五个不同阶段。我们分析了 2020 年至 2022 年期间 COVID-19 传播速度对国家创新的影响以及集体主义文化的调节作用。结果表明，在进入和起飞阶段，集体主义文化对 COVID-19 传播率与知识和技术产出之间的相关性起到了正向调节作用。在扩散阶段，个人主义文化正向调节 COVID-19 传播率与国家创新之间的相关性，集团内集体主义文化正向调节 COVID-19 传播率与国家创新投入和产出之间的相关性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Intercultural Relations Multiple-

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

14.30%

发文量

122

期刊介绍： IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.