Evaluation of SeeColors filters for color vision correction and comparative analysis with EnChroma glasses

IF 3.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Fangli Fan , Yifeng Wu , Danyan Tang , Yujie Shu , Zhen Deng , Hai Xin , Xiqiang Liu
{"title":"Evaluation of SeeColors filters for color vision correction and comparative analysis with EnChroma glasses","authors":"Fangli Fan ,&nbsp;Yifeng Wu ,&nbsp;Danyan Tang ,&nbsp;Yujie Shu ,&nbsp;Zhen Deng ,&nbsp;Hai Xin ,&nbsp;Xiqiang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.displa.2024.102831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of SeeColors filters to enhance color vision test results using the electronic version of the Farnsworth D-15 (E-D15) and Ishihara tests on a Samsung TV, and to compare their effectiveness with EnChroma glasses. Sixty-six subjects with congenital red–green color vision deficiency were tested. For both protan and deutan groups, the confusion angle shifted to negative values, with SeeColors filters exhibiting a greater effect than EnChroma glasses. In the deutan group, the TES, S-index, and C-index of the E-D15 test decreased, with the SeeColors D30 filter having a more pronounced effect than EnChroma deutan glasses. In the protan group, while EnChroma protan glasses tended to decrease the TES, S-index, and C-index, the SeeColors P30 filter increased them. For both groups, TS and TN of the Ishihara tests improved, with the SeeColors D30 filter demonstrating a stronger effect than EnChroma deutan glasses. The study concluded that both the SeeColors D30 filter and EnChroma deutan glasses were beneficial for deutans, albeit the SeeColors D30 filter was superior. In protans, neither the SeeColors P30 filter nor EnChroma protan glasses showed significant effectiveness, but the SeeColors P30 filter did improve performance in the pseudoisochromatic task.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50570,"journal":{"name":"Displays","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 102831"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141938224001951/pdfft?md5=ac0d10063902d0bded9a2e66cc83aeea&pid=1-s2.0-S0141938224001951-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Displays","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141938224001951","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of SeeColors filters to enhance color vision test results using the electronic version of the Farnsworth D-15 (E-D15) and Ishihara tests on a Samsung TV, and to compare their effectiveness with EnChroma glasses. Sixty-six subjects with congenital red–green color vision deficiency were tested. For both protan and deutan groups, the confusion angle shifted to negative values, with SeeColors filters exhibiting a greater effect than EnChroma glasses. In the deutan group, the TES, S-index, and C-index of the E-D15 test decreased, with the SeeColors D30 filter having a more pronounced effect than EnChroma deutan glasses. In the protan group, while EnChroma protan glasses tended to decrease the TES, S-index, and C-index, the SeeColors P30 filter increased them. For both groups, TS and TN of the Ishihara tests improved, with the SeeColors D30 filter demonstrating a stronger effect than EnChroma deutan glasses. The study concluded that both the SeeColors D30 filter and EnChroma deutan glasses were beneficial for deutans, albeit the SeeColors D30 filter was superior. In protans, neither the SeeColors P30 filter nor EnChroma protan glasses showed significant effectiveness, but the SeeColors P30 filter did improve performance in the pseudoisochromatic task.

用于色觉矫正的 SeeColors 滤镜的评估以及与 EnChroma 眼镜的比较分析
本研究的目的是评估 SeeColors 滤色镜在三星电视上使用电子版法恩斯沃斯 D-15 (E-D15) 和石原测试提高色觉测试结果的能力,并将其效果与 EnChroma 眼镜进行比较。66 名患有先天性红绿色盲的受试者接受了测试。在原色组和去色组中,混淆角均向负值移动,SeeColors 滤色镜的效果优于 EnChroma 眼镜。在去丹组中,E-D15 测试的 TES、S 指数和 C 指数都有所下降,SeeColors D30 滤光片的效果比 EnChroma 去丹眼镜更明显。在原样组中,EnChroma 原样眼镜倾向于降低 TES、S 指数和 C 指数,而 SeeColors P30 滤光片则提高了它们。在石原测试中,两组的 TS 和 TN 都有所改善,SeeColors D30 滤镜的效果比 EnChroma deutan 眼镜更强。研究得出结论,SeeColors D30 滤光片和 EnChroma deutan 眼镜都对鼬獾有益,但 SeeColors D30 滤光片更胜一筹。对于原猩猩,SeeColors P30 滤光片和 EnChroma 原猩猩眼镜都没有显示出明显的效果,但 SeeColors P30 滤光片确实提高了假异色任务的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Displays
Displays 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
25.60%
发文量
138
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Displays is the international journal covering the research and development of display technology, its effective presentation and perception of information, and applications and systems including display-human interface. Technical papers on practical developments in Displays technology provide an effective channel to promote greater understanding and cross-fertilization across the diverse disciplines of the Displays community. Original research papers solving ergonomics issues at the display-human interface advance effective presentation of information. Tutorial papers covering fundamentals intended for display technologies and human factor engineers new to the field will also occasionally featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信