Clinically relevant acute subjective effects of psychedelics beyond mystical experience

IF 16.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
David B. Yaden, Sean P. Goldy, Brandon Weiss, Roland R. Griffiths
{"title":"Clinically relevant acute subjective effects of psychedelics beyond mystical experience","authors":"David B. Yaden, Sean P. Goldy, Brandon Weiss, Roland R. Griffiths","doi":"10.1038/s44159-024-00345-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The administration of classic psychedelics has been associated with well-being and mental health benefits as well as risks and adverse events. The acute subjective effects of psychedelics might have a causal role in these risks and therapeutic benefits, but inconsistencies and limitations in the conceptualization and measurement of these acute subjective effects hinder research and clinical advances. In this Review, we outline current characterizations and psychometric examinations of the acute subjective effects of psychedelics, evaluate the construct validity of commonly used measures and describe findings showing that specific acute subjective effects predict certain outcomes. We discuss how to balance the limitations of existing measures with methodological advances in practice and elaborate on well-known methods and other psychological processes that can help inform the creation of new measures. We suggest actionable recommendations for how the field can transcend current conceptualizations and provide guidance on best practices until the next generation of measures is validated. The therapeutic benefits of psychedelics might be ascribed to their subjective effects, but methodological barriers limit interpretation of this association. In this Review, Yaden et al. balance the limitations of current assessments with research advances to inform the development of new measures and practices for understanding the clinical implications of psychedelics.","PeriodicalId":74249,"journal":{"name":"Nature reviews psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-024-00345-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature reviews psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-024-00345-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The administration of classic psychedelics has been associated with well-being and mental health benefits as well as risks and adverse events. The acute subjective effects of psychedelics might have a causal role in these risks and therapeutic benefits, but inconsistencies and limitations in the conceptualization and measurement of these acute subjective effects hinder research and clinical advances. In this Review, we outline current characterizations and psychometric examinations of the acute subjective effects of psychedelics, evaluate the construct validity of commonly used measures and describe findings showing that specific acute subjective effects predict certain outcomes. We discuss how to balance the limitations of existing measures with methodological advances in practice and elaborate on well-known methods and other psychological processes that can help inform the creation of new measures. We suggest actionable recommendations for how the field can transcend current conceptualizations and provide guidance on best practices until the next generation of measures is validated. The therapeutic benefits of psychedelics might be ascribed to their subjective effects, but methodological barriers limit interpretation of this association. In this Review, Yaden et al. balance the limitations of current assessments with research advances to inform the development of new measures and practices for understanding the clinical implications of psychedelics.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

超越神秘体验的迷幻药临床相关急性主观效应
传统迷幻药的使用与福祉和心理健康益处以及风险和不良事件有关。迷幻药的急性主观效应可能与这些风险和治疗益处有因果关系,但在这些急性主观效应的概念化和测量方面存在的不一致和局限性阻碍了研究和临床进展。在这篇综述中,我们概述了目前对迷幻药急性主观效应的特征描述和心理测量学检查,评估了常用测量方法的构建有效性,并描述了显示特定急性主观效应可预测某些结果的研究结果。我们讨论了如何在现有测量方法的局限性与实践方法的进步之间取得平衡,并阐述了有助于创建新测量方法的众所周知的方法和其他心理过程。我们就该领域如何超越现有概念提出了可行的建议,并在下一代测量方法得到验证之前为最佳实践提供指导。迷幻药的治疗效果可能归因于其主观效应,但方法论上的障碍限制了对这种关联的解释。在这篇综述中,Yaden 等人平衡了当前评估的局限性和研究进展,为开发新的测量方法和实践提供信息,以了解迷幻药的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信